The uncemented isoelastic/isotitan total hip arthroplasty: A 10-15 years follow-up with bone mineral density evaluation

Acta Orthopaedica Belgica

Volumn 72, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 55-64

  Nagi, Onkar N ^a,b   Kumar, Senthil ^a   Aggarwal, Sameer ^a  

^a POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH   (India)

^b NONE   (India)

Author keywords

Bone mineral density; Cementless; Isoelastic; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ADULT; ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS; ARTICLE; AVASCULAR NECROSIS; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW UP; HIP DISEASE; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYALGIA; PROGNOSIS; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; SCORING SYSTEM; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE CEMENTS; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; COHORT STUDIES; DENSITOMETRY, X-RAY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33644888340     PISSN: 00016462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aldinger PA, Sabo D, Pritsch M et al. Pattern of periprosthetic bone remodeling around stable uncemented tapered hip stems: A prospective 84-month follow-up study and a median 156-month cross-sectional study with DXA. Calcif Tissue Int 2003; 73: 115-121.
2. Ali MS, Kumar A. Isoelastic femoral component in primary cementless total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2002; 26: 243-46.
3. Andrew TA, Flanagan JP, Gerundini M, Bombelli R. The isoelastic, noncemented total hip arthroplasty: preliminary experience with 400 cases. Clin Orthop 1986; 206: 127-37.
4. Ang KC, De SD, Goh JCH et al. Periprosthetic bone remodeling after cementless total hip replacement. A prospective comparison of two different implant designs. J Bone Joint Surg 1997; 79-B: 675-59.
5. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg 1973; 55-A: 1629-1632.
6. DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1976; 121: 20-32.
7. Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH. Porous-coated hip replacement: the factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg 1987; 69-B: 45-55.
8. Engh CA, McGovern TF, Bobyn JD, Harris WH. A quantitative evaluation of periprosthesis remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 1992; 74-B: 1009-1020.
9. Engh Jr CA, Culpepper II WJ, Engh CA. Long-term results of use of the anatomic medullary locking prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 1997; 79-A: 177-184.
10. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. Modes of failure of cemented stem type femoral components. A radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 1979; 141: 17-27.
11. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures. Treatment by mold arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 1969; 51-A: 737-755.
12. Huiskes R, Weinans H, Van Rietbergen B. The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin Orthop 1992; 274: 124-34.
13. Jasty M, O' Connor DO, Henshaw RM et al. Fit of the uncemented femoral component and the use of cement influence the strain transfer to the femoral cortex. J Orthop Res 1994; 12: 648-656.
14. Krish G, Kligman M, Roffman M. Hydroxyapatite-coated total hip replacement in Paget's disease. 20 patients followed for 4-8 years. Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72: 127-132.
15. Lester DK, Campbell P. 100-year-old patient with press fit prosthesis: a postmortem retrieval study. Am J Orthop 1996; 25: 30-34.
16. Malchau H, Karrholm J, Wang YX, Herberts P. Accuracy of migration analysis in hip arthroplasty. Digitized and conventional radiography compared to radiostereometry in 51 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1995; 66: 418-424.
17. McCarthy CK, Steinberg GG, Agren M et al. Quantifying of bone loss from the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 1991; 73-B: 774-778.
18. Morscher EW, Mathys R. La prothèse totale isoélastique de hanche fixée sans ciment. Acta Orthop Belg 1974; 40: 321-347.
19. Nagi ON, Dhillon MS, Goni V, Bapuraj R. Preliminary experience with isoelastic total hip arthroplasty using impaction bone grafting. European J Trauma Orth Surg 2000; 10: 27-33.
20. Niinimaki T, Puranen J, Jalovaara P. Total hip arthroplasty using Isoelastic femoral stems. A seven-to nine-year follow-up in 108 patients. J Bone Joint Surg 1994; 76-B: 413-418.
21. Nunn D, Freeman MA, Hill PF, Evans SJ. The measurement of migration of the acetabular component of hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg 1989; 71-B: 629-631.
22. Reiter A, Gellrich JC, Bachmann J, Braun A. Changes of periprosthetic bone mineral density in cementless bicontact stem implantation; influence of different parameters - a prospective 4-year follow-up. Z Orthop 2003; 141: 283-288.
23. Rosso R. Five-year review of the isoelastic RM total hip endoprosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998; 107: 86-88.
24. Sumner DR, Turner TM, Igloria R et al. Functional adaptation and ingrowth of bone vary as a function of hip implant stiffness. J Biomech 1998; 31: 909-917.
25. Trager D. Results of 5-7 year follow-up of implantation of RM isoelastic hip endoprosthesis. Unfallchirurg 1989; 92: 301-304.