Tissue characterization with an electrical spectroscopy SVM classifier

IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 525-528

  Laufer, Shlomi ^a   Rubinsky, Boris ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Classifiers; Electrical spectroscopy; Mammography; Support vector machine (SVM)

Indexed keywords

BENIGN TISSUES; BREAST CANCERS; DISCRETE LOCATIONS; ELECTRICAL EXCITATIONS; ELECTRICAL SPECTROSCOPY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; MATHEMATICAL SIMULATION MODELS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE (SVM); SVM CLASSIFIERS; TISSUE CHARACTERIZATIONS;

CLASSIFIERS; DIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHY; IMAGE RETRIEVAL; PLANNING; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; TISSUE; VECTORS;

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

ARTICLE; CANCER TISSUE; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRICAL SPECTROSCOPY; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIMULATION; SPECTROSCOPY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; TISSUE CHARACTERIZATION; TUMOR CLASSIFICATION;

BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROMAGNETIC PHENOMENA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS;

EID: 64249128124     PISSN: 00189294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2008.2003105     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. American Computer Society, Cancer Facts and Figures 2007. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 2007.
2. A. O. Bilska-Wolak and C. E. Floyd, Jr., "Development and evaluation of a case-based reasoning classifier for prediction of breast biopsy outcome with BI-RADS lexicon," Med. Phys., vol. 29, pp. 2090-2100, Sep. 2002.
3. E. S. Burnside, E. A. Sickles, R. E. Sohlich, and K. E. Dee, "Differential value of comparison with previous examinations in diagnostic versus screening mammography," Amer. J. Roentgenol., vol. 179, pp. 1173-1177, Nov. 2002.
4. A. T. Stavros, D. Thickman, C. L. Rapp, M. A. Dennis, S. H. Parker, and G. A. Sisney, "Solid breast nodules: Use of sonography to distinguish between benign andmalignant lesions," Radiology, vol. 196, pp. 123-134, Jul. 1995.
5. M. A. Dennis, S. H. Parker, A. J. Klaus, A. T. Stavros, T. I. Kaske, and S. B. Clark, "Breast biopsy avoidance: The value of normal mammograms and normal sonograms in the setting of a palpable lump," Radiology, vol. 219, pp. 186-191, Apr. 2001.
6. D. Miklavi, N. Pav̌selj, and F. X. Hart, "Electric properties of tissues," in Wiley Encyclopedia of Biomedical Engineering. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2006.
7. A. J. Surowiec, S. S. Stuchly, J. R. Barr, and A. A. S. A. Swarup, "Dielectric properties of breast carcinoma and the surrounding tissues," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 257-263, Apr. 1988.
8. J. Jossinet, "Variability of impedivity in normal and pathological breast tissue," Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., vol. 34, pp. 346-350, Sep. 1996.
9. J. Jossinet and M. Schmitt, "A review of parameters for the bioelectrical characterization of breast tissue," Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., vol. 873, pp. 30-41, Apr. 1999.
10. C. Myoung Hwan, K. Tzu-Jen, D. Isaacson, G. J. A. S. G. J. Saulnier, and J. C. A. N. J. C. Newell, "A reconstruction algorithm for breast cancer imaging with electrical impedance tomography in mammography geometry," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 700-710, Apr. 2007.
11. H. Ryan, H. Alex, and D. P. Keith, "Design and implementation of a high frequency electrical impedance tomography system," Physiol. Meas., vol. 25, pp. 379-390, 2004.
12. A. Adler and W. R. B. Lionheart, "Information content of EIT measurements," in Proc. 13th Int. Conf. Elect. Bioimpedance and 8th Conf. Elect. Impedance Tomogr., 2007, vol. 17, pp. 360-363.
13. C. J. C. Burges, "A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition," Data Min. Knowl. Discov., vol. 2, pp. 121-167, 1998.
14. B. Scḧolkopf and A. J. Smola, Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press, 2002.
15. Y. Wu, Y. Li, L. Guo, W. Yan, X. Shen, and K. Fu, "SVM for solving forward problems of EIT," in Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., 2005, vol. 2, pp. 1559-1562.
16. Y. Wu, L. Guo, G. Dong, Q. Wu, X. Shen, G. Xu, and W. Yan, "Tissue conductivity estimation in two-dimension head model based on support vector machine," Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., 2006, vol. 1, pp. 1130-1133.
17. G. Goldswain and J. Tapson, "Kernel ridge regression for volume fraction prediction in electrical impedance tomography," Meas. Sci. Technol., vol. 17, pp. 2711-2720, 2006.
18. J. F. Edd and B. Rubinsky, "Detecting cryoablation with EIT and the benefit of including ice front imaging data," Physiol. Meas., vol. 27, pp. S175-S185, May 2006.
19. A. Adler andW.R. Lionheart, "Uses and abuses of EIDORS: An extensible software base for EIT," Physiol. Meas., vol. 27, pp. S25-S42, May 2006.
20. Y. Jiang, C. E. Metz, and R. M. Nishikawa, "A receiver operating characteristic partial area index for highly sensitive diagnostic tests," Radiology, vol. 201, pp. 745-750, Dec. 1996.
21. T. Joachims, "Making large-scale SVM learning practical," in Advances in Kernel Methods-Support Vector Learning, B. Scḧolkopf, C. Burges, and A. Smola, Eds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.