Perception of 3D shape in context: Contrast and assimilation

Vision Research

Volumn 49, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 746-751

  van der Kooij, Katinka ^a   te Pas, Susan F ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

3D; Cue combination; Long range interactions; Shape; Slant contrast

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; BINOCULAR VISION; COLOR VISION; CONTRAST; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVER BIAS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMETRICS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 64249099680     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anstis S.M. What does visual perception tell us about visual coding. In: Blakemore C., and Gazzaniga M.S. (Eds). Handbook of psychobiology (1975), Academic Press, New York 269-323
2. Anzai A., Ohzawa I., and Freeman R.D. Joint-encoding of motion and depth by visual cortical neurons: Neural basis of the Pulfrich effect. Nature Neuroscience 4 (2001) 513-518
3. Bradshaw M.F., and Rogers B.J. The interaction of binocular disparity and motion parallax in the computation of depth. Vision Research 36 (1996) 3457-3468
4. Brady T.F., and Chung M.M. Spatial constraints on learning in visual search: Modelling contextual cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 33 (2007) 798-815
5. Cornsweet T.M. Visual perception (1970), Academic Press, New York
6. Curran W., and Johnston A. Three dimensional curvature contrast-geometric or brightness illusion?. Vision Research 36 (1996) 3641-3653
7. Domini F., and Caudek C. Perceiving surface slant from deformation of optic flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 426-444
8. Domini F., Caudek C., and Tassinari H. Stereo and motion information are not independently processed by the visual system. Vision Research 46 (2006) 1707-1723
9. van Ee R., Banks M.S., and Backus B.T. An analysis of binocular slant contrast. Perception 28 (1999) 1121-1145
10. Felleman D.J., and van Essen D.C. Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cerebral Cortex 1 (1991) 419-423
11. Gattass R., Nascimento-Silva S., Soares J.G., Lima B., Jansen A.K., Diogo A.C., et al. Cortical visual areas in monkeys: Location, topography, connections, columns, plasticity and cortical dynamics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B Biological Science 360 (2005) 709-731
12. Gibson J.J. Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of curved lines. Journal of Experimental Psychology 16 (1933) 1-31
13. Gilliam B., and Grove P.M. Slant or occlusion: Global factors resolve stereoscopic ambiguity in sets of horizontal lines. Vision Research 44 (2004) 2359-2366
14. Graham M.E., and Rogers B.J. Simultaneous and successive contrast effects in the perception of depth from motion parallax and stereoscopic information. Perception 11 (1982) 247-262
15. Hanada M. Effects of the noise level on induced motion. Vision Research 44 (2004) 1757-1763
16. Knapen T., and van Ee R. Slant perception, and its voluntary control, do not govern the slant aftereffect: Multiple slant signals adapt independently. Vision Research 46 (2006) 3381-3392
17. Landy M.S., Maloney L.T., Johnston E.B., and Johnston M.Y. Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research 35 (1995) 389-412
18. Maunsell J.H., and van Essen D.C. Functional properties of neurons in the middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. II. Binocular interactions and sensitivity to binocular disparity. Journal of Neurophysiology 49 (1983) 1148-1167
19. Maunsell J.H., and Newsome W.T. Visual processing in monkey extrastriate cortex. Annual Reviews Neuroscience 10 (1987) 363-401
20. te Pas S.F., and Kappers A.M.L. First-order structure induces the curvature contrast effect. Vision Research 41 (2001) 3829-3835
21. te Pas S.F., Rogers B.J., and Ledgeway T. A curvature contrast effect for stereoscopically defined surfaces. Current Psychology Letters: Brain Behaviour and Cognition 1 (2000) 117-126
22. Poom L., Olsson H., and Borjesson E. Dissociations between slant-contrast and reversed slant-contrast. Vision Research 47 (2007) 746-754
23. Sperling G., Dosher B., and Landy M.S. How to study the kinetic depth effect experimentally. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16 (1990) 445-450
24. Todd J.T., Thaler L., and Dijkstra T.M.H. The effects of field of view on the perception of 3D slant from texture. Vision Research 45 (2005) 1501-1517
25. van der Kooij, K., & te Pas, S. F. (in press). Uncertainty reveals surround modulation of shape. Journal of Vision, doi:10.1167/0.0.1.
26. Welchmann A.E., Deubelius A., Conrad V., Bulthoff H., and Kourtzi Z. 3D shape perception from combined depth cues in human visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience 8 (2005) 820-827
27. Zeki S.M. Uniformity and diversity of structure and function in rhesus-monkey prestriate visual-cortex. Journal of Physiology 277 (1978) 273-290