Comparing perceptual judgment and subjective measures of spatial awareness

Applied Ergonomics

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 597-607

  Bolton, Matthew L ^a   Bass, Ellen J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Perspective judgments; Spatial awareness; Subjective measures

Indexed keywords

ERRORS; LOCATION;

CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISPLAY CONFIGURATIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTS; INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS; PERSPECTIVE JUDGMENTS; SPATIAL AWARENESS; SUBJECTIVE MEASURES; SYNTHETIC VISION SYSTEMS;

SPATIAL VARIABLES MEASUREMENT;

ADULT; AIRPLANE PILOT; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; EVALUATION; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT ERROR; PERCEPTION; SIMULATION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; TIME PERCEPTION; WORKLOAD;

EID: 64049110560     PISSN: 00036870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.04.020     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Adams C.A., Murdoch J.L., Consiglio M.C., and Williams D.M. Incorporating data link messaging into a multi-function display to support the Small Aircraft Transportation System (SATS) and the self-separation of general aviation aircraft. Applied Ergonomics 38 (2007) 465-471
2. Adelstein B.D., and Ellis S.R. Rotation and direction judgment from visual images head-slaved in two and three degrees-of-freedom. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans 30 2 (2000) 165-173
3. Arthur, J.J., Prinzel III, L.J., Kramer, L.J., Parrish, R.V., Bailey, R.E., 2004. Flight Simulator Evaluation of Synthetic Vision Display Concepts to Prevent Controlled Flight into Terrain (CFIT). NASA Technical Report NASA/TP-2004-213008.
4. Bailey, R.E., Kramer, L.J., Prinzel III, L.J., 2006. Crew and display concepts evaluation for synthetic/enhanced vision systems. In: 2006 Proceedings of SPIE Conference on Enhanced and Synthetic Vision.
5. Bailey, R.E., Parrish, R.V., Arthur III, J.J., Norman, R., 2002. Flight test evaluation of tactical synthetic vision display concepts in a terrain-challenged operating environment. In: Enhanced and Synthetic Vision 2002, April 1-2, pp. 178-189.
6. Barfield W., and Rosenberg C. Judgments of azimuth and elevation as a function of monoscopic and binocular depth cues using a perspective display. Human Factors 37 1 (1995) 173-181
7. Boeing Commercial Airplanes, 2007. Statistical Summary of Commercial Jet Airplane Accidents: Worldwide Operations 1959-2006. Retrieved April 15, 2008 from: http://www.boeing.com/news/techissues/pdf/statsum.pdf.
8. Bolton M.L., and Bass E.J. Using relative position and temporal judgments to identify biases in spatial awareness for Synthetic Vision Systems. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 18 2 (2008) 183-206
9. Bolton, M.L., Bass, E.J., Comstock, J.R., 2006. A toolset to support the development of spatial and temporal judgment experiments for synthetic vision systems. In: 2006 IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium, April 28, 2006, Charlottesville, VA.
10. Bolton M.L., Bass E.J., and Comstock J.R. Spatial awareness in synthetic vision systems: using spatial and temporal judgments to evaluate texture and field of view. Human Factors 49 6 (2007) 961-974
11. Brace N., Kemp R., and Snelgar R. SPSS for Psychologists: a Guide to Data Analysis using SPSS for Windows (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ
12. Bustamante E.A., Fallon C.K., Bliss J.P., Bailey III W.R., and Anderson B.L. Pilots' workload, situation awareness, and trust during weather events as a function of time pressure, role assignment, pilots' rank, weather display, and weather system. International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies 5 2 (2005) 347-367
13. Comstock J.R., Glaab L.J., Prinzel L.J., and Elliott D.M. Can effective synthetic vision system displays be implemented on limited size display spaces?. Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (2001), The Ohio State University, Dayton, Ohio
14. Denford, M.J., Steele, J.A., Roy, R., Kalantzis, E., 2004. Measurement of air traffic control situational awareness enhancement through radar support toward operating envelope expansion of an unmanned aerial vehicle. In: Proceedings of the 36th Conference on Winter Simulation, Washington, D.C., pp. 1017-1025.
15. Dorrian J., Roach G.D., Fletcher A., and Dawson D. Simulated train driving: fatigue, self-awareness and cognitive disengagement. Applied Ergonomics 38 2 (2007) 155-166
16. Dorighi, N.S., Grunwald, A.J., Ellis, S.R., 1992. Perspective format for a primary flight display and its effect on pilot spatial awareness. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/AIAA 11th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.
17. Endsley, M.R., 1988. Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). In: Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, pp. 789-795.
18. Endsley M.R. Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37 1 (1995) 65-84
19. Endsley M.R. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37 1 (1995) 32-64
20. Endsley, M.R., Selcon, S.J., Hardiman, T.D., Croft, D.G., 1998. A comparative analysis of SAGAT and SART for evaluations of situation awareness. In: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, October 5-9.
21. Fracker M.L. Attention gradients in situation awareness. Situational Awareness in Aerospace Operations AGARD-CP-478 (1990), Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development, Neuilly-Sur-Seine, France
22. Gibson J.J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (1986), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
23. Glaab L.J., and Hughes M.F. Terrain portrayal for head-down displays flight test. Proceedings of the 22nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (2003), DASC, Indianapolis, Indiana
24. Hughes M.F., and Takallu M.A. Terrain portrayal for head-down displays experiment. Proceedings of the International Advanced Aviation Conference (2002), Anchorage, Alaska
25. Khatwa R., and Roelen A. An analysis of controlled-flight-into-terrain (CFIT) accidents of commercial operators, 1988 through 1994. Flight Safety Digest 17 (1998) 166-212
26. Korn B., Lorenz B., Doehler H., Többen H., and Hecker P. Passive "Radar-PAPI" landing aids for precision straight-in approach and landing in low-visibility. International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies 4 2 (2004) 13-38
27. Marshak, W.P., Kuperman, G., Ramsey, E.G., Wilson, D., 1987. Situational awareness in map displays. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 31st Annual Meeting, New York, NY, pp. 533-535.
28. McGreevy M.W., and Ellis S.R. The effect of perspective geometry on judged direction in spatial information instruments. Human Factors 28 4 (1986) 439-456
29. Pew R.W. The state of situation awareness measurement: heading toward the next century. In: Endsley M.R., and Garland D.J. (Eds). Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahwah 33-47
30. Saleem J.J., and Kleiner B.M. The effect of nighttime and deteriorating visual conditions on pilot performance, workload, and situation awareness, in general aviation for both VFR and IFR approaches. International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies 5 1 (2005) 107-120
31. Sarter N.B., and Woods D.D. Situation awareness: a critical but ill-defined phenomenon. International Journal of Aviation Psychology 1 (1991) 45-57
32. Schnell, T., Lemos, K., 2002. Terrain Sampling Density and Texture Requirements for Synthetic Vision Systems. Rockwell Collins Final Report. Rockwell Collins, Cedar Rapids, IA.
33. Selcon S.J., and Taylor R.M. Evaluation of the situational awareness rating technique, SART as a tool for aircrew systems design. Situational Awareness in Aerospace Operations 8 (1990), AGARD, Neuilly-Sur-Seine, France
34. Stark, J.M., Comstock Jr., J.R., Prinzel, L.J., Burdette, D.W., Scerbo, M.W., 2001. A preliminary examination of situation awareness and pilot performance in a synthetic vision environment. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting, October 8-12, pp. 40-43.
35. Stevens J.P. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences (2002), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ
36. Takallu, M.A., Wong, D.T., Bartolone, A.P., Hughes, M.F., Glaab, L.J., 2004. Interaction between various terrain portrayals and guidance/tunnel symbology concepts for general aviation synthetic vision displays during a low en-route scenario. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Salt Lake City, UT.
37. Taylor R.M. Situational awareness rating technique, SART: the development of a tool for aircrew systems design. Situational Awareness in Aerospace Operations 17 (March 1990), AGARD, Neuilly-Sur-Seine, France 1-17
38. Turner A.D. Paired-comparison method for interval scaling. Human Factors 38 2 (1996) 362-374
39. Vidulich M.A., and Hughes E.R. Testing a subjective metric of situation awareness. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting, September 2-6 vol. 2 (1991) pp. 1307-1311
40. Vidulich M.A., Ward G.F., and Schueren J. Using the subjective workload dominance, SWORD technique for projective workload assessment. Human Factors 33 6 (1991) 677-691
41. Wells, M.J., Venturino, M., Osgood, R.K., 1988. Using target replacement performance to measure spatial awareness. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting, Anaheim, CA.
42. Wickens C.D. Situation awareness and workload in aviation. Current Directions in Psychological Science 11 4 (2002) 128-133
43. Wickens, C.D., 2002b. Spatial Awareness Biases. NASA Technical Report ARL-02-6/NASA-02-4.
44. Yeh Y. Spatial judgments with monoscopic and stereoscopic presentation of perspective displays. Human Factors 34 5 (1992) 583-600