A Preliminary Examination of Situation Awareness and Pilot Performance in a Synthetic Vision Environment

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 40-43

  Stark, Julie M ^a   Comstock, J Raymond ^b   Prinzel, Lance J ^b   Burdette, Daniel W ^c   Scerbo, Mark W ^a  

^a OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^c Lockheed Martin LaRc Program Office   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR NAVIGATION; AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL; AIRCRAFT ACCIDENTS; AIRPORT RUNWAYS; COCKPITS (AIRCRAFT); COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; PHOTOGRAPHY; RETROFITTING; VISIBILITY; VISION; WEATHER FORECASTING;

RUNWAY INCURSIONS (RI); SITUATION AWARENESS (SA); SYNTHETIC VISION SYSTEMS (SVS);

ERGONOMICS;

EID: 0442310993     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/154193120104500208     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. Comstock, J.R., Glaab, L.J., Prinzel, L.J., & Elliott, D.M. (2001). Can effective synthetic vision system displays be implemented on limited size display spaces? Proceedings of the Eleventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus OH.
2. Doherty, S., & Wickens, C.D. (2001). Theoretical explanations for the benefit of tunnel-in-the-sky presentations. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus OH.
3. Hart, S., & Staveland, L. (1988). Development of the NASA-TLX: Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. Hancock and N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
4. Jennings, C. Alter, K. & Barrows, A. Enge, P. & Powell, J.D. (1999). 3-D Perspective Flight Displays for Guidance and Traffic Awareness. Proceedings of ION-GPS '99 Nashville, TN.
5. Regal, D.M., & Whittington, D. (1995). Guidance symbology for curved flight paths. Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus OH.
6. Taylor, R. M. (1989). Situational awareness rating technique (SART): The development of a tool for aircrew systems design. Proceedings of the NATO Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development (AGARD) Situational Awareness in Aerospace Operations Symposium (AGARD-CP-478).
7. Wickens, C.D., Fadden, S., Merwin, D., Ververs, P.M., (1998). Cognitive factors in aviation display design. Proceedings of the digital avionics systems conference, Bellevue, WA.
8. Wiener, E.L. & Nagel, D.C. (1988). Human factors in aviation. Academic Press.