Using relative position and temporal judgments to identify biases in spatial awareness for synthetic vision systems

International Journal of Aviation Psychology

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 183-206

  Bolton, Matthew L ^a   Bass, Ellen J ^a  

^a University of Virginia   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 41549095537     PISSN: 10508414     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508410801926814     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alexander, A. L., Wickens, C. D., & Hardy, T. J. (2005). Synthetic vision and the primary flight display: The effects of guidance symbology, display size, and field of view. Human Factors, 47, 693-707.
2. Alm, T., Lif, P., & Öberg, M. (2003). Evaluation of monocular depth cues in 3D aircraft displays. In R. S. Jensen (ed.), Proceedings of the 12th international symposium on aviation psychology. Dayton: Ohio State University.
3. Arthur, J. J., Prinzel, L. J., III, Kramer, L. J., Parrish, R. V., & Bailey, R. E. (2004). Flight simulator evaluation of synthetic vision display concepts to prevent controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) (Tech. Rep. No. NASA/TP-2004-213008). Hampton, VA: NASA.
4. Bailey, R. E., Kramer, L. J., & Prinzel, L. J., III. (2006). Crew and display concepts evaluation for synthetic/enhanced vision systems. In D. L. Andrews (ed.), 2006 Proceedings of SPIE conference on enhanced and synthetic vision (pp. 62260G.1-62260G.18). Bellingham, WA: International Society for Optical Engineering.
5. Bailey, R. E., Parrish, R. V., Arthur, J. J., III, & Norman, R. (2002). Flight test evaluation of tactical synthetic vision display concepts in a terrain-challenged operating environment. In J. G. Verly (ed.), Enhanced and Synthetic Vision 2002 (pp. 178-189). Bellingham, WA: International Society for Optical Engineering.
6. Barfield, W., & Rosenberg, C. (1995). Judgments of azimuth and elevation as a function of monoscopic and binocular depth cues using a perspective display. Human Factors, 37, 173-181.
7. Barfield, W., Rosenberg, C., & Furness, T. A. I. (1995). Situation awareness as a function of frame of reference, computer-graphics eyepoint elevation, and geometric field of view. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 5, 233-256.
8. Boeing Commercial Airplanes. (2006). Statistical summary of commercial jet airplane accidents: World wide operations 1959-2005. Retrieved September 9, 2006, from, http://www.boeing.com/news/techissues/pdf/statsum.pdf
9. Bolton, M. L., & Bass, E. J. (2007). Spatial awareness: Comparing judgment-based and subjective measures. In 2007 IEEE International Conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (pp. 2582-2587). Los Alamitos, CA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
10. Bolton, M. L., Bass, E. J., & Comstock, J. R. (2006). A toolset to support the development of spatial and temporal judgment experiments for synthetic vision systems. In M. D. De Vore (ed.), Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design symposium (pp. 58-63). Los Alamitos, CA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
11. Bolton, M. L., Bass, E. J., & Comstock, J. R. (2007). Spatial awareness in synthetic vision systems: Using relative position and temporal judgments to assess the effects of texture and field of view. Human Factors, 49, 961-974.
12. Borst, C., Suijkerbuijk, H. C. H., Mulder, M., & Van Paassen, M. M. (2006). Ecological interface design for terrain awareness. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 16, 375-400.
13. Brace, N., Kemp, R., & Snelgar, R. (2003). SPSS for psychologists: A guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
14. Glaab, L. J., & Hughes, M. F. (2003). Terrain portrayal for head-down displays flight test. In Proceedings of the 22nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (pp. 9.E.2-1-9.E.2-15). Los Alamitos, CA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
15. Goldstein, E. B. (2002). Sensation and perception (6th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth.
16. Hughes, M. F., & Takallu, M. A. (2002). Terrain portrayal for head-down displays experiment. In Proceedings of the International Advanced Aviation conference (pp. G-1-G-12). Anchorage, AK: University of Alaska.
17. Khatwa, R., & Roelen, A. (1998). An analysis of controlled-flight- into-terrain (CFIT) accidents of commercial operators, 1988 through 1994. Flight Safety Digest, 17, 166-212.
18. McGreevy, M. W., & Ellis, S. R. (1986). The effect of perspective geometry on judged direction in spatial information instruments. Human Factors, 28, 439-456.
19. McGreevy, M. W., Ratzlaff, C. R., & Ellis, S. R. (1986). Virtual space and two-dimensional effects in perspective displays. In R. A. Miller & R. J. Jagacinski (eds), Proceedings of the 21st annual conference on Manual Control (NASA-CP-2428, pp. 29.1-29.14). Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
20. Schnell, T., & Lemos, K. (2002). Terrain sampling density and texture requirements for synthetic vision systems (Rockwell Collins Final Rep.). Cedar Rapids, IA: Rockwell Collins.
21. Stevens, J. P. (2002) Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
22. Taylor, R. M. (1990). Situational awareness rating technique (SART): The development of a tool for aircrew systems design. AGARD, Situational Awareness in Aerospace Operations, 17, 3/1-3/17.
23. Vidulich, M. A., & Hughes, E. R. (1991). Testing a subjective metric of situation awareness. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th annual meeting (Vol. 2, pp. 1307-1311). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
24. Wickens, C. D. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance. New York: HarperCollins.
25. Wickens, C. D. (2002). Spatial awareness biases (NAS A Tech. Rep. ARL-02-67NASA-02-4). Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
26. Wickens, C. D., Liang, C. C., Prevett, T., & Olmos, O. (1996). Electronic maps for terminal area navigation: Effects of frame of reference and dimensionality. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 241-271.
27. Yeh, Y. (1992). Spatial judgments with monoscopic and stereoscopic presentation of perspective displays. Human Factors, 34, 583-600.