Crew and display concepts evaluation for synthetic / enhanced vision systems

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 6226, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Bailey, Randall E ^a   Kramer, Lynda J ^a   Prinzel III, Lawrence J ^a  

^a NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Aviation Safety; Crew Resource Management; Enhanced Flight Vision System; Enhanced Vision System; FLIR; Head Up Display; Image Fusion; Runway Incursions; Synthetic Vision System

Indexed keywords

AVIATION SAFETY; CREW RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; ENHANCED FLIGHT VISION SYSTEMS; ENHANCED VISION SYSTEMS; FLIR; HEAD-UP DISPLAYS; IMAGE FUSION; RUNWAY INCURSIONS; SYNTHETIC VISION SYSTEMS;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; AIRCRAFT; AIRPORTS; CIVIL AVIATION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE SENSORS;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 33748444886     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.666711     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Kramer, L.J., Arthur, J.J., Bailey, R.E., and Prinzel, L.J. III, Flight Testing An Integrated Synthetic Vision System, In Proceedings of SPIE, Enhanced and Synthetic Vision 2005, Editor: Jacques G. Verly, Volume 5802, Paper 1, April 2005.
2. Arthur, J.J., Prinzel, L.J., Kramer, L.J., Bailey, R.E., & Parrish, R.V. (2003). CFIT Prevention Using Synthetic Vision. In Proceedings of SPIE, Enhanced and Synthetic Vision 2003, Editor: Jacques G. Verly, Volume 5018, Paper 16, April 2003.
3. Schiefele, J. et al Human Factors Flight Trial Analysis for 3D SVS: Part II, In Proceedings of SPIE, Enhanced and Synthetic Vision 2005, Editor: Jacques G. Verly, Volume 5802, Paper 18, April 2005.
4. Schnell, T., Theunissen, E., and Rademaker, R. Human Factors Test & Evaluation of an Integrated Synthetic Vision and Sensor-Based Flight Display System for Commercial and Military Applications, paper presented at the NATO Research and Technology Organization, Human Factors and Medicine panel workshop entitled "Toward Recommended Methods for Testing and Evaluation of EV and E/SV-Based Visionic Devices", Williamsburg, VA, USA, 26-27 April 2005.
5. Arthur, J.J., Kramer, L.J., and Bailey, R.E., and Prinzel, L.J. III, Flight Test Comparison Between Enhanced Vision (FLIR) and Synthetic Vision Systems, In Proceedings of SPIE, Enhanced and Synthetic Vision 2005, Editor: Jacques G. Verly, Volume 5802, Paper 3, April 2005.
6. Parrish, R.V, Busquets, A.M., Williams, S.P., & Nold, D.E. (2003). Evaluation of Alternate Concepts for Synthetic Vision Flight Displays with Weather-Penetrating Sensor Image Inserts During Simulated Landing Approaches. NASA TP-2003-212643, October 2003.
7. Harrah, S.D., et al. The NASA Approach To Realize A Sensor Enhanced-Synthetic Vision System (SE-SVS). paper presented at 21 st IEEE / AIAA Digital Avionics Conference, October 2002.
8. th Annual International Symposium on Aerospace / Defense Sensing, Simulation and Controls, AeroSense, Orlando, FL, April 16-20, 2001
9. McKay, D., Guirguis, M., Zhang, R. and Newman, R.L. Evaluation of EVSfor Approach Hazard Detection, paper presented at the RTO SET Workshop on "Enhanced and Synthetic Vision System", held in Ottawa, Canada, September 2002, published as NATO RTO-MP-107.
10. Boff, K.R. and Lincoln, J.E., (Editors). Engineering Data Compendium: Human Perception and Performance. H.G. Anderson Medical Research Laboratory, Ohio.
11. Merrick, V.K. and Jeske, J.A., Flightpath Synthesis and HUD Scaling for V/STOL Terminal Area Operations. NASA Technical Memorandum 110348, April 1995.
12. Kramer, L.J., Prinzel, L.J., Bailey, R.E., & Arthur, J.J. (2003). Synthetic Vision Enhances Situation Awareness And RNP Capabilities For Terrain-Challenged Approaches. Proceedings of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Third Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Technical Forum, AIAA 2003-6814, 1-11.
13. Glaab, L.J., Kramer, L.J., Arthur, T., & Barry, J.S. (2003). Flight Test Comparison Of Synthetic Vision Display Concepts At Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. NASA Langley Research Center: NASA Technical Paper TP-2003-212177.
14. Kramer, L.J., Prinzel, L.J., Arthur, J.J., & Bailey, R.E. (2004). Pathway Design Effects On Synthetic Vision Head-Up Displays. SPIE. In Proceedings of SPIE, Enhanced and Synthetic Vision 2004, Editor: Jacques G. Verly, Volume 5424-08.
15. th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, pp. 397-402. Dayton, OH...
16. Ames, Lawrence L. & George, Edward J. (1993). Revision and verification of a seven-point workload estimation scale. Air Force Flight Technical Center: AFFTC-TIM-93-01.
17. AIAA (1993). Guide to Human Performance Measurement. Washington D.C.: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
18. Vidulich, M.A. & Hughes, E.R. (1991). Testing A Subjective Metric Of Situation Awareness. Proceedings of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society, 35, 1307-1311.
19. Kramer, L.J., Prinzel III, L.J., Bailey, R.E., Arthur III, J.J., & Parrish, R.V. (2004). Flight Test Evaluation of Synthetic Vision Concepts at a Terrain-Challenged Airport. NASA Langley Research Center: NASA Technical Paper TP-2004-212997.