Compaction of cell shape occurs before decrease of elasticity in CHO-K1 cells treated with actin cytoskeleton disrupting drug cytochalasin D

Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 193-201

  Schulze, Christian ^a   Müller, Karla ^a   Käs, Josef A ^a   Gerdelmann, Jens C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Atomic force microscopy; Mechanical homeostasis; Morphology; Rheology; Scanning force microscopy; Volume

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHALASIN D;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL COMPOSITION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL SHAPE; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL VOLUME; CHO CELL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOSKELETON; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; FLOW KINETICS; MUSCLE FIBER CONTRACTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING FORCE MICROSCOPY;

ACTINS; ANIMALS; CELL LINE; CELL SHAPE; CELLS, CULTURED; CHO CELLS; CRICETINAE; CRICETULUS; CYTOCHALASIN D; CYTOSKELETON; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; ELASTICITY; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NUCLEIC ACID SYNTHESIS INHIBITORS; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 63849293494     PISSN: 08861544     EISSN: 10970169     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cm.20341     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Ben Ze'ev A. 1985. The cytoskeleton in cancer cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 780:197-212.
2. Berdyyeva TK, Woodworth CD, Sokolov I. 2005. Human epithelial cells increase their rigidity with ageing in vitro: Direct measurements. Phys Med Biol 50:81-92.
3. Brenner SL, Korn ED. 1980. The effects of cytochalasins on actin polymerization and actin ATPase provide insights into the mechanism of polymerization. J Biol Chem 255:841-844.
4. Bretscher A. 1991. Microfilament structure and function in the cortical cytoskeleton. Annu Rev Cell Biol 7:337-374.
5. Bustamante M, Roger F, Bochaton-Piallat ML, Gabbiani G, Martin PY, Feraille E. 2003. Regulatory volume increase is associated with p38 kinase-dependent actin cytoskeleton remodeling in rat kidney MTAL. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 285:F336-F347.
6. Butt H-J, Jaschke M. 1995. Calculation of thermal noise in atomic force microscopy. Nanotechnology 6:1-7.
7. Byers TJ, Branton D. 1985. Visualization of the protein associations in the erythrocyte membrane skeleton. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:6153-6157.
8. Charras GT, Horton MA. 2002. Single cell mechanotransduction and its modulation analyzed by atomic force microscope indentation. Biophys J 82:2970-2981.
9. Chen WT. 1971. Computation of stresses and displacements in a layered medium. Int J Eng Sci 9:775-800.
10. Chen WT, Engel PA. 1972. Impact and contact stress analysis in multilayer media. Int J Solids Struct 8:1257.
11. Cornet M, Lambert IH, Hoffmann EK. 1993. Relation between cyto- skeleton, hypo-osmotic treatment and volume regulation in Ehrlich ascites tumor cells. J Membr Biol 131:55-66.
12. Cornet M, Isobe Y, Lemanski LF. 1994. Effects of anisosmotic conditions on the cytoskeletal architecture of cultured PC12 cells. J Morphol 222:269-286.
13. Dannenberg JH, van Rossum A, Schuijff L, te Riele H. 2000. Ablation of the retinoblastoma gene family deregulates G(1) control causing immortalization and increased cell turnover under growth-restricting conditions. Genes Dev 14:3051-3064.
14. Endlich N, Otey CA, Kriz W, Endlich K. 2007. Movement of stress fibers away from focal adhesions identifies focal adhesions as sites of stress fiber assembly in stationary cells. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 64:966-976.
15. Foskett JK, Spring KR. 1985. Involvement of calcium and cytoskele- ton in gallbladder epithelial cell volume regulation. Am J Phys- iol 248:C27-C36.
16. Frame MD, Sarelius IH. 2000. Flow-induced cytoskeletal changes in endothelial cells growing on curved surfaces. Microcirculation 7:419-427.
17. Galli C, Guizzardi S, Passeri G, Macaluso GM, Scandroglio R. 2005. Life on the wire: On tensegrity and force balance in cells. Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense 76:5-12.
18. Gardel ML, Shin JH, MacKintosh FC, Mahadevan L, Matsudaira P, Weitz DA. 2004. Elastic behavior of cross-linked and bundled actin networks. Science 304:1301-1305.
19. Guck J, Schinkinger S, Lincoln B, Wottawah F, Ebert S, Romeyke M, Lenz D, Erickson HM, Ananthakrishnan R, Mitchell D, Kas J, Ulvick S, Bilby C. 2005. Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence. Biophys J 88:3689-3698.
20. Hallows KR, Law FY, Packman CH, Knauf PA. 1996. Changes in cytoskeletal actin content. F-actin distribution, and surface morphology during HL-60 cell volume regulation. J Cell Physiol 167:60-71.
21. Hayat MA. 1981. Fixation for Electron Microscopy. New York: Academic Press.
22. Herrera RE, Sah VP, Williams BO, Makela TP, Weinberg RA, Jacks T. 1996. Altered cell cycle kinetics, gene expression, and G1 restriction point regulation in Rb-deficient fibroblasts. Mol Cell Biol 16:2402-2407.
23. Hertz H. 1881. Uber die Berührung fester elastischer Korper. J Reine Angew Math 92:156-171.
24. Hofmann UG, Rotsch C, Parak WJ, Radmacher M. 1997. Investigating the cytoskeleton of chicken cardiocytes with the atomic force microscope. J Struct Biol 119:84-91.
25. Ishikawa H. 1988. Plasmalemmal undercoat: The cytoskeleton supporting the plasmalemma. Arch Histol Cytol 51:127-145.
26. Janmey PA, Weitz DA. 2004. Dealing with mechanics: Mechanisms of force transduction in cells. Trends Biochem Sci 29:364-370.
27. Kolega J, Janson LW, Taylor DL. 1991. The role of solation-contrac- tion coupling in regulating stress fiber dynamics in nonmuscle cells. J Cell Biol 114:993-1003.
28. Lazarides E, Weber K. 1974. Actin antibody: The specific visualization of actin filaments in non-muscle cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71:2268-2272.
29. Lekka M, Laidler P, Gil D, Lekki J, Stachura Z, Hrynkiewicz AZ. 1999. Elasticity of normal and cancerous human bladder cells studied by scanning force microscopy. Eur Biophys J 28: 312-316.
30. QS, Lee GY, Ong CN, Lim CT. 2008. AFM indentation study of breast cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 374:609-613.
31. Lin DC, Tobin KD, Grumet M, Lin S. 1980. Cytochalasins inhibit nuclei-induced actin polymerization by blocking filament elongation. J Cell Biol 84:455-460.
32. Lu YB, Franze K, Seifert G, Steinhauser C, Kirchhoff F, Wolburg H, Guck J, Janmey P, Wei EQ, Kas J, Reichenbach A. 2006. Viscoelastic properties of individual glial cells and neurons in the CNS. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:17759-17764.
33. MacKintosh FC, Kas J, Janmey PA. 1995. Elasticity of semiflexible biopolymer networks. Phys Rev Lett 75:4425-4428.
34. Mahaffy RE, Shih CK, MacKintosh FC, Kas J. 2000. Scanning probe- based frequency-dependent microrheology of polymer gels and biological cells. Phys Rev Lett 85:880-883.
35. Mahaffy RE, Park S, Gerde E, Kas J, Shih CK. 2004. Quantitative analysis of the viscoelastic properties in thin regions of fibroblasts using AFM. Biophys J 86:1777-1793.
36. Mammoto A, Huang S, Ingber DE. 2007. Filamin links cell shape and cytoskeletal structure to Rho regulation by controlling accumulation of p190RhoGAP in lipid rafts. J Cell Sci 120:456-467.
37. Matzke R, Jacobson K, Radmacher M. 2001. Direct, high-resolution measurement of furrow stiffening during division of adherent cells. Nat Cell Biol 3:607-610.
38. Mountain I, Waelkens E, Missiaen L, van Driessche W. 1998. Changes in actin cytoskeleton during volume regulation in C6 glial cells. Eur J Cell Biol 77:196-204.
39. Nakamura T, Liu M, Mourgeon E, Slutsky A, Post M. 2000. Mechanical strain and dexamethasone selectively increase surfactant protein C and tropoelastin gene expression. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 278:L974-L980.
40. Nermut MV. 1981. Visualization of the ''membrane skeleton'' inhuman erythrocytes by freeze-etching. Eur J Cell Biol 25:265-271.
41. Oliet SH, Bourque CW. 1993. Mechanosensitive channels transduce osmosensitivity in supraoptic neurons. Nature 364:341-343.
42. Park S, Koch D, Cardenas R, Kas J, Shih CK. 2005. Cell motility and local viscoelasticity of fibroblasts. Biophys J 89:4330-4342.
43. Paul R, Heil P, Spatz JP, Schwarz US. 2008. Propagation of mechanical stress through the actin cytoskeleton toward focal adhesions: Model and experiment. Biophys J 94:1470-1482.
44. Pavalko FM, Chen NX, Turner CH, Burr DB, Atkinson S, Hsieh YF, Qiu J, Duncan RL. 1998. Fluid shear-induced mechanical signaling in MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts requires cytoskeleton-integrin interactions. Am J Physiol 275:C1591-C1601.
45. Pesen D, Hoh JH. 2005. Micromechanical architecture of the endothe- lial cell cortex. Biophys J 88:670-679.
46. Petersen NO, McConnaughey WB, Elson EL. 1982. Dependence of locally measured cellular deformability on position on the cell, temperature, and cytochalasin B. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:5327-5331.
47. Puck TT, Cierciura SJ, Robinson A. 1958. Genetics of somatic mammalian cells. III. Long-term cultivation of euploid cells from human and animal subjects. J Exp Med 108:945-956.
48. Reuner KH, Wiederhold M, Schlegel K, Just I, Katz N. 1995. Autore- gulation of actin synthesis by physiological alterations of the G-actin level in hepatocytes. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 33:569-574.
49. Rotsch C, Radmacher M. 2000. Drug-induced changes of cytoskeletal structure and mechanics in fibroblasts: An atomic force microscopy study. Biophys J 78:520-535.
50. Sage J, Mulligan GJ, Attardi LD, Miller A, Chen S, Williams B, Theo- dorou E, Jacks T. 2000. Targeted disruption of the three Rb-related genes leads to loss of G(1) control and immortalization. Genes Dev 14:3037-3050.
51. Sato M, Theret DP, Wheeler LT, Ohshima N, Nerem RM. 1990. Application of the micropipette technique to the measurement of cultured porcine aortic endothelial cell viscoelastic properties. J Biomech Eng 112:263-268.
52. Schneider SW, Pagel P, Rotsch C, Danker T, Oberleithner H, Rad- macher M, Schwab A. 2000. Volume dynamics in migrating epithelial cells measured with atomic force microscopy. Pflugers Arch 439:297-303.
53. Shen BW, Josephs R, Steck TL. 1986. Ultrastructure of the intact skeleton of the human erythrocyte membrane. J Cell Biol 102: 997-1006.
54. Staruschenko A, Negulyaev YA, Morachevskaya EA. 2005. Actin cy- toskeleton disassembly affects conductive properties of stretch- activated cation channels in leukaemia cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1669:53-60.
55. Stournaras C, Stiakaki E, Koukouritaki SB, Theodoropoulos PA, Kal- manti M, Fostinis Y, Gravanis A. 1996. Altered actin polymerization dynamics in various malignant cell types: Evidence for differential sensitivity to cytochalasin B. Biochem Pharmacol 52:1339-1346.
56. Takeuchi M, Miyamoto H, Sako Y, Komizu H, Kusumi A. 1998. Structure of the erythrocyte membrane skeleton as observed by atomic force microscopy. Biophys J 74:2171-2183.
57. Theodoropoulos PA, Stournaras C, Stoll B, Markogiannakis E, Lang F, Gravanis A, Haussinger D. 1992. Hepatocyte swelling leads to rapid decrease of the G-/total actin ratio and increases actin mRNA levels. FEBS Lett 311:241-245.
58. Tsukita S, Tsukita S, Ishikawa H. 1980. Cytoskeletal network underlying the human erythrocyte membrane. Thin-section electron microscopy. J Cell Biol 85:567-576.
59. Tu YO, Grazis DC. 1964. The contact problem of a plate pressed between two spheres. J Appl Mech 31:659.
60. Wakatsuki T, Schwab B, Thompson NC, Elson EL. 2001. Effects of cytochalasin D and latrunculin B on mechanical properties of cells. J Cell Sci 114:1025-1036.
61. Walsh CJ. 2007. The role of actin, actomyosin and microtubules in defining cell shape during the differentiation of Naegleria amebae into flagellates. Eur J Cell Biol 86:85-98.
62. Watanabe N, Mitchison TJ. 2002. Single-molecule speckle analysis of actin filament turnover in lamellipodia. Science 295:1083-1086.
63. Wong AJ, Pollard TD, Herman IM. 1983. Actin filament stress fibers in vascular endothelial cells in vivo. Science 219:867-869.
64. Wottawah F, Schinkinger S, Lincoln B, Ebert S, Muller K, Sauer F, Travis K, Guck J. 2005. Characterizing single suspended cells by optorheology. Acta Biomater 1:263-271.
65. Zhang G, Long M, Wu ZZ, Yu WQ. 2002. Mechanical properties of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. World J Gastroenterol 8:243-246.
66. Zhang Z, Kindrat AN, Sharif-Naeini R, Bourque CW. 2007. Actin filaments mediate mechanical gating during osmosensory trans- duction in rat supraoptic nucleus neurons. J Neurosci 27:4008-4013.
67. Ziyadeh FN, Mills JW, Kleinzeller A. 1992. Hypotonicity and cell volume regulation in shark rectal gland: Role of organic osmo- lytes and F-actin. Am J Physiol 262:F468-F479.