Two-stage analysis for gene-environment interaction utilizing both case-only and family-based analysis

Genetic Epidemiology

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 95-104

  Chen, Yi Hau ^a   Lin, Hui Wen ^b   Liu, Huimei ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF STATISTICAL SCIENCE   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Case parent studies; Case sibling studies; Gene environment independence; Parental missingness

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE PARENT STUDY; CASE SIBLING STUDY; CASE STUDY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; FAMILY STUDY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; HETEROZYGOTE DETECTION; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; METHODOLOGY; POWER ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VALIDATION PROCESS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FAMILY; FEMALE; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; GENOTYPE; MALE; POPULATION GENETICS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; EPIDEMIOLOGY, MOLECULAR; FAMILY; FEMALE; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL;

EID: 63449109098     PISSN: 07410395     EISSN: 10982272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20357     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Albert PS, Ratnasinghe D, Tangrea J, Wacholder S. 2001. Limitations of the case-only design for identifying gene-environment interactions. Am J Epidemiol 154:687-693.
2. Allen AS, Rathouz PJ, Satten GA. 2003. Informative missingness in genetic association studies: case-parent designs. Am J Hum Genet 72:671-680.
3. Armstrong BG. 2003. Fixed factors that modify the effects of time-varying factors: applying the case-only approach. Epidemiol 14:467-472.
4. Chatterjee N, Kalaylioglu Z, Carroll RJ. 2005. Exploiting geneenvironment independence in family-based case-control studies: increased power for detecting associations, interactions and joint effects. Genet Epidemiol 28:138-156.
5. Chen YH. 2004. New approach to association testing in case-parent designs under informative parental missingness. Genetic Epidemiol 27:131-140.
6. Chen YH, Chen H. 2000. A unified approach to regression analysis under double-sampling designs. J R Stat Soc B 62:449-460.
7. Cheng KF. 2006. A maximum likelihood method for studying gene-environment interactions under conditional independence of genotype and exposure. Stat Med 25:3093-3109.
8. Foppa I, Spiegelman D. 1997. Power and sample size calculations for case-control studies of gene-environment interactions with a polytomous exposure variable. Am J Epidemiol 146:596-604.
9. Gatto NM, Campbell UB, Rundle AG, Ahsan H. 2004. Further development of the case-only design for assessing gene-environment interaction: evaluation of and adjustment for bias. Int J Epidemiol 33:1014-1024.
10. Gauderman WJ. 2002. Sample size requirements for matched case-control studies of gene-environment interaction. Stat Med 21:35-50.
11. Gauderman WJ, Witte JS, Thomas DC. 1999. Family-based association studies. J N Cancer Inst 26:31-37.
12. Hunter DJ. 2005. Gene-environment interactions in human diseases. Nat Rev Genet 6:287-298.
13. Hwang SJ, Beaty TH, Liang KY, Coresh J, Khoury MJ. 1994. Minimum sample size estimation to detect gene-environment interaction in case-control designs. Am J Epidemiol 140:1029-1037.
14. Khoury MJ, Flanders WD. 1996. Nontraditional epidemiologic approaches in the analysis of gene-environment interaction: case-control studies with no controls. Am J Epidemiol 144:207-213.
15. Kraft P, Yen YC, Stram DO, Morrison J, Gauderman WJ. 2007. Exploiting gene-environment interaction to detect genetic associations. Hum Hered 63:111-119.
16. Laird NM, Lange C. 2006. Family-based designs in the age of large-scale gene-association studies. Nat Rev Genet 7:385-394.
17. Olden K. 2007. Commentary: From phenotype, to genotype, to geneenvironment interaction and risk for complex diseases. Int J Epidemiol 36:18-20.
18. Piegorsch WW, Weinberg CR, Taylor JA. 1994. Non-hierarchical logistic models and case-only designs for assessing susceptibility in population-based case-control studies. Stat Med 13:153-162.
19. Schaid DJ. 1999. Case-parents design for gene-environment interaction. Genet Epidemiol 16:261-273.
20. Schaid DJ, Sommer SS. 1993. Genotype relative risks: methods for design and analysis of candidate-gene association studies. Am J Hum Genet 53:1114-1126.
21. Siegmund KD, Langholtz B, Kraft P, Thomas DC. 2000. Testing linkage disequilibrium in sibships. Am J Hum Genet 67:244-248.
22. Spielman RS, McGinnis RE, Ewens WJ. 1993. Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Am J Hum Genet 52:506-516.
23. Sinha S, Maiti T. 2008. Analysis of matched case-control data in presence of nonignorable missing exposure. Biometrics 64:106-114.
24. Thomas DC. 2000. Case-parents design for gene-environment interaction by Schaid. Genet Epidemiol 19:461-463.
25. Thomas DC, Witte JS. 2002. Point: Population stratification: a problem for case-control studies of candidate-gene associations? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:505-512.
26. Umbach DM, Weinberg CR. 1997. Designing and analysing casecontrol studies to exploit independence of genotype and exposure. Stat Med 16:1731-1743.
27. Umbach DM, Weinberg CR. 2000. The use of case-parent triads to study joint effects of genotype and exposure. Am J Hum Genet 66:251-261.
28. Ursin G, Henderson BE, Haile RW, Zhou N, Diep A, Bernstein L. 1997. Is oral contraceptive use more common in women with BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations than in other women with breast cancer? Cancer Res 57:3678-3681.
29. Witte JS, Gauderman WJ, Thomas DC. 1999. Asymptotic bias and efficiency in case-control studies of candidate genes and gene-environment interactions: basic family designs. Am J Epidemiol 149:693-705.
30. Yang Q, Khoury MJ, Flanders WD. 1997. Sample size requirements in case-only designs to detect gene-environment interaction. Am J Epidemiol 146:713-720.