The individual within the group: Respect!

Individuality and the Group: Advances in Social Identity

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 175-195

  Spears, Russell ^a   Ellemers, Naomi ^b   Doosje, Bertjan ^c   Branscombe, Nyla ^d  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 63149171170     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781446211946.n10     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. Allport, F. H. (1924). Social psychology. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
2. Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258-290. doi:10.1037/h0055756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0055756
3. Barreto, M. & Ellemers, N. (2000). You can't always do what you want: Social identity and self-presentational determinants of the choice to work for a low status group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 891-906. doi:10.1177/01461672002610001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01461672002610001
4. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachment as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
5. Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., Ellemers, N., & Doosje, B. (2002). Intragroup and inter-group evaluation effects on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 744-753. doi:10.1177/0146167202289004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167202289004
6. Branscombe, N. R., & Wann, D. L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of out-group derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641-658. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420240603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420240603
7. Codol, J. -P. (1975). On the so-called "superior conformity of the self" behaviour: Twenty experimental investigations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 457-501. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420050404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420050404
8. Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410-436. doi:10.1006/jesp.1995.1018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1995.1018
9. Doosje, B., Spears, R., & Koomen, W. (1995). When bad isn't all bad: The strategic use of sample information in generalization and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 642-655. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.642
10. Duck, J. M., & Fielding, K. S. (2003). Leaders and their treatment of subgroups: Implications for evaluations of the leader and the superordinate group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 387-401. doi:10.1002/ejsp.153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.153
11. Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302, 290-292. doi:10.1126/science.1089134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1089134
12. Ellemers, N., Doosje, B., & Spears, R. (2004). Sources of respect: The effects of being liked by ingroups and outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 155-172. doi:10.1002/ejsp.196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.196
13. Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: Ingroup identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 617-626. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.617
14. Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161-186. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135228
15. Ellemers, N., van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. (1990). The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 233-246. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00902.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00902.x
16. Feather, N. T. (1994). Attitudes toward high achievers and reactions to their fall: Theory and research concerning tall poppies. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 1-73. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60151-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601%2808%2960151-3
17. Fiske, S. T., Xu, J., Cuddy, A. C., & Glick, P. (1999). (Dis)respecting versus (dis)liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 473-489. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00128
18. Haslam, S. A., & Platow, M. J. (2001). The link between leadership and followership: How affirming social identity translates vision into action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1469-1479. doi:10.1177/01461672012711008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01461672012711008
19. Hollander, E. P. (1964). Leaders, groups and influence. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Jetten, J., Branscombe, N. R., & Spears, R. (in press). Living on the edge: Dynamics of intragroup and intergroup rejection experiences. In R.Brown & D.Capozza (Eds.), Social identities: Motivational, emotional and cultural influences. London: Sage.
21. Jetten, J., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & McKimmie, B. (2003). Predicting the paths of peripherals: The interaction of identification and future possibilities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 130-140. doi:10.1177/0146167202238378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167202238378
22. Jetten, J., Postmes, T., & McAuliffe, B. J. (2002). "We're all individuals": Group norms of individualism and collectivism, levels of identification, and identity threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 189-207. doi:10.1002/ejsp.65 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.65
23. Jetten, J., Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., & McKimmie, B. M. (2005). Suppressing the negative effect of devaluation on group identification: The role of intergroup differentiation and intragroup respect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 208-215. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.07.008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.07.008
24. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford.
25. Leary, M. R., & MacDonald, G. (2003). Individual differences in self-esteem: A review and theoretical integration. In M. R.Leary & J. P.Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 401-418). New York: Guilford.
26. Luhtanen, R. & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302-318. doi:10.1177/0146167292183006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167292183006
27. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
28. Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Noel, J. G., Wann, D. L., & Branscombe, N. R. (1995). Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity toward outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 127-137. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.1.127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.1.127
30. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
31. Ouwerkerk, J. W., de Gilder, D., & de Vries, N. K. (2000). When the going gets tough, the tough get going: Social identification and individual effort in intergroup competition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1550-1559. doi:10.1177/01461672002612009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01461672002612009
32. Peeters, G. (2002). From good and bad to can and must: subjective necessity of acts associated with positively and negatively valued stimuli. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 125-136. doi:10.1002/ejsp.70 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.70
33. Postmes, T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2002). Influence of long-term racial environmental composition on subjective well-being in African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 735-751. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.735
34. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Lee, A. T., & Novak, R. J. (in press). Individuality and social influence in groups: Inductive and deductive routes to group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
35. Reicher, S. D. (2001). Social identity definition and enactment: A broad SIDE against irrationalism and relativism. In T.Postmes, R.Spears, M.Lea, & S. D.Reicher (Eds.), SIDE issues centre stage: Recent developments of de-individuation in groups (pp. 175-190). Amsterdam: Proceedings of the Dutch Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences.
36. Reicher, S. D., Hopkins, N., & Condor, S. (1997). Stereotype construction as a strategy of influence? In R.Spears, P. J.Oakes, N.Ellemers, & S. A.Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 94-118). Oxford: Blackwell.
37. Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 161-198. doi:10.1080/14792779443000049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14792779443000049
38. Rosenberg, S., Nelson, S., & Vivekanathan, P. S. (1968). A multi-dimensional approach to the study of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 238-294. doi:10.1037/h0026086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0026086
39. Scheepers, D., Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2002). Integrating identity and instrumental approaches to intergroup differentiation: Different contexts, different motives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1455-1467. doi:10.1177/014616702237574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014616702237574
40. Sedikides, C., & Strube, M. J. (1997). Self-evaluation: to thine own self be good, to thine own self be sure, to thine own self be true, and to thine own self better. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 209-269. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60018-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601%2808%2960018-0
41. Seta, J. J., & Seta, C. E. (1996). Big fish in small ponds: A social hierarchy analysis of intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1210-1221. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1210
42. Simon, B., & Stürmer, S. (2003). Respect for group members: Intragroup determinants of collective identification and group-serving behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 183-193. doi:10.1177/0146167202239043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167202239043
43. Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131-142. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.131
44. Sleebos, E., Ellemers, N., & De Gilder, D. (2004a). Being in or out: The effects of respect on perceived standing and inclusion in the group. Manuscript submitted for publication, Leiden University.
45. Sleebos, E., Ellemers, N., & De Gilder, D. (2004b). The carrot or the stick: Disrespected group members' engagement in group serving effort. Manuscript submitted for publication, Leiden University.
46. Smith, H. J., & Tyler, T. R. (1997). Choosing the right pond: The impact of group membership on self-esteem and group-oriented behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 146-170. doi:10.1006/jesp.1996.1318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1996.1318
47. Smith, R. H., Turner, T. J., Garonzik, R., Leach, C. W., Urch, V., & Weston, C. (1996). Envy andSchadenfreude. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 158-168. doi:10.1177/0146167296222005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167296222005
48. Spears, R. (2001). The interaction between the individual and the collective self: Self-categorization in context. In C.Sedikides & M. B.Brewer (Eds.), Individual self, relational self, and collective self: Partners, opponents or strangers? (pp. 171-198). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
49. Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538-553. doi:10.1177/0146167297235009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167297235009
50. Spears, R., Doosje, B. & Ellemers, N. (1999). Commitment and the context of social perception. In N.Ellemers, R.Spears and B.Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 59-83). Oxford: Blackwell.
51. Spears, R., Ellemers, N., & Doosje, B. (2005). Let me count the ways in which I respect thee: Does competence-based respect compensate or compromise liking-based respect?European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 263-279. doi:10.1002/ejsp.248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.248
52. Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computermediated communication. Communication Research, 21, 427-459. doi:10.1177/009365094021004001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009365094021004001
53. Stroebe, K. E., Lodewijkx, H. F. M., & Spears, R. (2005). Do unto others as they do unto you: Reciprocity and social identification as determinants of in-group favoritism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 831-846. doi:10.1177/0146167204271659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271659
54. Tajfel, H. (ed.) (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic.
55. Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the group. In H.Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15-40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Tyler, T. R. (1999). Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity-based perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 201-246.
57. Tyler, T. R., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. J. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: a test of the psychological dynamics of the group value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913-930. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.913
58. Vliek, M. L. W., Leach, C. W., Spears, R., & Wigboldus, D. H. J. (2005). No worse than average: Shifting the in-group average as protection against an unflattering upward comparison. Manuscript submitted for publication, University of Amsterdam.
59. Vonk, R. (1999). Effects of other-profitability and self-profitability on evaluative judgements of behaviours. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 833-842. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199911)29:7<833::AID-EJSP950>3.0.CO;2-Z http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-0992%28199911%2929:7%3C833::AID-EJSP950%3E3.0.CO;2-Z
60. Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K. T., & Choi, W. (2000). Cyber-ostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748-762. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.748