-
1
-
-
0003877566
-
-
(Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), Cha.
-
P. Y. Yu and M. Cardona, Fundamentals of Semiconductors (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1999), Chap..
-
(1999)
Fundamentals of Semiconductors
-
-
Yu, P.Y.1
Cardona, M.2
-
4
-
-
0031190138
-
-
0031-8965 10.1002/1521-396X(199707)162:1<39::AID-PSSA39>3.0.CO;2-L.
-
S. Nakashima and H. Harima, Phys. Status Solidi A 0031-8965 10.1002/1521-396X(199707)162:1<39::AID-PSSA39>3.0.CO;2-L 162, 39 (1997).
-
(1997)
Phys. Status Solidi A
, vol.162
, pp. 39
-
-
Nakashima, S.1
Harima, H.2
-
5
-
-
0035890604
-
-
0021-8979 10.1063/1.1410884.
-
M. Chafai, A. Jaouhari, A. Torres, R. Antón, E. Martín, J. Jiḿnez, and W. C. Mitchel, J. Appl. Phys. 0021-8979 10.1063/1.1410884 90, 5211 (2001).
-
(2001)
J. Appl. Phys.
, vol.90
, pp. 5211
-
-
Chafai, M.1
Jaouhari, A.2
Torres, A.3
Antón, R.4
Martín, E.5
Jiḿnez, J.6
Mitchel, W.C.7
-
6
-
-
18144394767
-
-
0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.027401.
-
R. Huber, C. Kübler, S. Tübel, A. Leitenstorfer, Q. T. Vu, H. Hang, F. Köhler, and M. -C. Amann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.027401 94, 027401 (2005).
-
(2005)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.94
, pp. 027401
-
-
Huber, R.1
Kübler, C.2
Tübel, S.3
Leitenstorfer, A.4
Vu, Q.T.5
Hang, H.6
Köhler, F.7
Amann, M.-C.8
-
7
-
-
0003978681
-
-
in, edited by M. Cardona and G. Güntherodt (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), Cha.
-
T. Dekorsy, G. C. Cho, and H. Kurz, in Light Scattering in Solids VIII, edited by, M. Cardona, and, G. Güntherodt, (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2000), Chap..
-
(2000)
Light Scattering in Solids VIII
-
-
Dekorsy, T.1
Cho, G.C.2
Kurz, H.3
-
9
-
-
0030569168
-
-
0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.4062.
-
G. C. Cho, T. Dekorsy, H. J. Bakker, R. Hövel, and H. Kurz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.4062 77, 4062 (1996).
-
(1996)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.77
, pp. 4062
-
-
Cho, G.C.1
Dekorsy, T.2
Bakker, H.J.3
Hövel, R.4
Kurz, H.5
-
10
-
-
0000230066
-
-
0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.16526.
-
M. Hase, S. Nakashima, K. Mizoguchi, H. Harima, and K. Sakai, Phys. Rev. B 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.16526 60, 16526 (1999).
-
(1999)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.60
, pp. 16526
-
-
Hase, M.1
Nakashima, S.2
Mizoguchi, K.3
Harima, H.4
Sakai, K.5
-
11
-
-
63049110941
-
-
The main difference between the previous experiment (Ref.) and the present experiment is the bandwidth of the detection (<30 THz in the previous one), which enabled us to observe plasmonlike LOPC modes at the higher total carrier density than those in the previous study.
-
The main difference between the previous experiment (Ref.) and the present experiment is the bandwidth of the detection (<30 THz in the previous one), which enabled us to observe plasmonlike LOPC modes at the higher total carrier density than those in the previous study.
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
0242460524
-
-
0028-0836 10.1038/nature02044.
-
M. Hase, M. Kitajima, A. M. Constantinescu, and H. Petek, Nature (London) 0028-0836 10.1038/nature02044 426, 51 (2003).
-
(2003)
Nature (London)
, vol.426
, pp. 51
-
-
Hase, M.1
Kitajima, M.2
Constantinescu, A.M.3
Petek, H.4
-
13
-
-
0032000044
-
-
0028-0836
-
S. Nakashima, K. Mizoguchi, H. Harima, and K. Sakai, J. Lumin. 76-77, 6 (1998). 0028-0836
-
(1998)
J. Lumin.
, vol.76-77
, pp. 6
-
-
Nakashima, S.1
Mizoguchi, K.2
Harima, H.3
Sakai, K.4
-
14
-
-
33847165304
-
-
0003-6951 10.1063/1.2679926.
-
Y. -M. Chang, H. W. Chu, C. -H. Shen, H. -Y. Chen, and S. Gwo, Appl. Phys. Lett. 0003-6951 10.1063/1.2679926 90, 072111 (2007).
-
(2007)
Appl. Phys. Lett.
, vol.90
, pp. 072111
-
-
Chang, Y.-M.1
Chu, H.W.2
Shen, C.-H.3
Chen, H.-Y.4
Gwo, S.5
-
16
-
-
0009509593
-
-
0018-9219 10.1109/PROC.1967.6123.
-
D. M. Caughey and R. E. Thomas, Proc. IEEE 0018-9219 10.1109/PROC.1967. 6123 55, 2192 (1967).
-
(1967)
Proc. IEEE
, vol.55
, pp. 2192
-
-
Caughey, D.M.1
Thomas, R.E.2
-
17
-
-
63049118561
-
-
The data in Fig. was fit to also the power law of μ∼ N tot -1 and μ∼ N tot -1/3, according to the Drude model and the Coulomb screening model, respectively (Ref.). The former model reproduced the reduction in μ at Ntot <1.4× 1018 cm-3 well, while the latter one explained the behavior of μ at Ntot >1.4× 1018 cm-3.
-
The data in Fig. was fit to also the power law of μ∼ N tot -1 and μ∼ N tot -1/3, according to the Drude model and the Coulomb screening model, respectively (Ref.). The former model reproduced the reduction in μ at Ntot <1.4× 1018 cm-3 well, while the latter one explained the behavior of μ at Ntot >1.4× 1018 cm-3.
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
0000515397
-
-
0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.R4222.
-
H. P. M. Pellemans and P. C. M. Planken, Phys. Rev. B 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.R4222 57, R4222 (1998).
-
(1998)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.57
, pp. 4222
-
-
Pellemans, H.P.M.1
Planken, P.C.M.2
-
20
-
-
0001187833
-
-
0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.28.915.
-
J. R. Meyer and F. J. Bartoli, Phys. Rev. B 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.28.915 28, 915 (1983).
-
(1983)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.28
, pp. 915
-
-
Meyer, J.R.1
Bartoli, F.J.2
-
21
-
-
57349157067
-
-
0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.235501.
-
J. D. Lee and M. Hase, Phys. Rev. Lett. 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 101.235501 101, 235501 (2008).
-
(2008)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.101
, pp. 235501
-
-
Lee, J.D.1
Hase, M.2
|