Patient discomfort and retakes in periapical examination of mandibular third molars using digital receptors and film

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology

Volumn 107, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 566-572

  Matzen, Louise Hauge ^a   Christensen, Jennifer ^a   Wenzel, Ann ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL MODEL; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH ROOT; X RAY FILM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR, THIRD; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; TOOTH ROOT; TOOTH, IMPACTED; X-RAY FILM; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 62849118694     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Haiter-Neto F., Pontual A., Frydenberg M., and Wenzel A. A comparison of older and newer versions of intraoral digital radiography systems. Diagnosing noncavitated proximal carious lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 138 (2007) 1353-1359
2. Tsuchida R., Araki K., Endo A., Funahashi I., and Okano T. Physical properties and ease of operation of a wireless intraoral X-ray sensor. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 100 (2005) 603-608
3. Wenzel A., Haiter-Neto F., and Gotfredsen E. Influence of spatial resolution and bit depth on detection of small caries lesions with digital receptors. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 103 (2007) 418-422
4. Bahrami G., Hagström C., and Wenzel A. Bitewing examination with four digital receptors. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 32 (2003) 317-321
5. Wenzel A., Frandsen E., and Hintze H. Patient discomfort and cross-infection control in bitewing examination with a storage phosphor plate and a CCD-based sensor. J Dent 27 (1999) 243-246
6. Wenzel A. A review of dentists' use of digital radiography and caries diagnosis with digital systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35 (2006) 307-314
7. Wenzel A., and Kirkevang L.-L. Students' attitude to digital radiography and measurement accuracy of two digital systems in connection with root canal treatment. Eur J Dent Educ 8 (2004) 167-171
8. Wenzel A., and Møystad A. Experience of Norwegian general dental practitioners with solid state and storage phosphor detectors. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 30 (2001) 203-208
9. Berkhout W.E.R., Sanderink G.C.H., and Van der Stelt P.F. Does digital radiography increase the number of intraoral radiographs?. A questionnaire study of Dutch dental practices. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 32 (2003) 124-127
10. Neugebauer J., Shirani R., Mischkowski R.A., Ritter L., Scheer M., Keeve E., et al. Comparison of cone-beam volumetric imaging and combined plain radiographs for localization of the mandibular canal before removal of impacted lower third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 105 (2008) 633-642 discussion 643
11. Tantanapornkul W., Okouchi K., Fujiwara Y., Tamashiro M., Maruoka Y., Ohbayashi N., et al. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 103 (2007) 253-259
12. Bell G.W. Use of dental panoramic tomographs to predict the relation between mandibular third molar teeth and the inferior alveolar nerve. Radiological and surgical findings, and clinical outcome. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42 (2004) 21-27
13. Bell G.W., Rodgers J.M., Grime R.J., Edwards K.L., Hahn M.R., Dorman M.L., et al. The accuracy of dental panoramic tomographs in determining the root morphology of mandibular third molar teeth before surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 95 (2003) 119-125
14. Benediktsdóttir I.S. Digital panoramic radiography for assessment of mandibular third molars (2003), PhD thesis School of Dentistry, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
15. Öhman A., Kivijärvi K., Blombäck U., and Flygare L. Pre-operative radiographic evaluation of lower third molars with computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35 (2006) 30-35
16. Wenzel A., Aagaard E., and Sindet-Pedersen S. Evaluation of a new radiographic technique: diagnostic accuracy for mandibular third molars. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 27 (1998) 255-263
17. Wenzel A., Aagaard E., and Sindet-Pedersen S. Evaluation of a new radiographic technique: outcome following removal of mandibular third molars. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 27 (1998) 264-269
18. Lurie A.G. Panoramic Imaging. In: White S.C., and Pharoah M.J. (Eds). Oral radiology principles and interpretation. 6th ed. (2009), Mosby, St. Louis (MO) 175-190
19. Tammisalo T., Happonen R.-P., and Tammisalo E.H. Stereographic assessment of mandibular canal in relation to the roots of impacted lower third molar using multiprojection narrow beam radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 21 (1992) 85-89
20. Danforth R.A., Peck J., and Hall P. Cone beam volume tomography: an imaging option for diagnosis of complex mandibular third molar anatomical relationships. J Calif Dent Assoc 31 (2003) 847-852
21. Nakagawa Y., Ishii H., Nomura Y., Watanabe N.Y., Hoshiba D., Kobayashi K., and Ishibashi K. Third molar position: reliability of panoramic radiography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65 (2007) 1303-1308
22. Radiation protection. European guidelines on radiation protection in dental radiology. The safe use of radiographs in dental practice. European Committee Issue No. 136.
23. Price D.D., McGrath P.A., Rafii A., and Buckingham B. The validation of visual analoque scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 17 (1983) 45-46
24. Versteeg C.H., Sanderink G.C.H., van Ginkel F.C., and van der Stelt P.F. An evaluation of periapical radiography with a charge-coupled device. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 27 (1998) 97-101