An evaluation of periapical radiography with a charge-coupled device

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 97-101

  Versteeg, C H ^a   Sanderink, G C H ^a   Van Ginkel, F C ^b   Van der Stelt, P F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b Netherlands Inst for Dent Sciences   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Computer assisted; Dental; Image processing; Quality control; Radiography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; PERIODONTIUM; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIOGRAPHY; SEMICONDUCTOR; STANDARD; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; VISION; X RAY FILM;

EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; PERIAPICAL TISSUE; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; SEMICONDUCTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 0032014087     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600330     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Versteeg CH, Sanderink GCH, Van der Stelt PF. Efficacy of digital iltra-oral radiography in clinical dentistry. J Dent 1997; 25: 215-224.
2. Horner K, Shearer AC, Walker A, Wilson NHF. Radiovisiography: An initial evaluation. Br Dent J 1990; 168: 244-248.
3. Carmichael FA, Sheard L, Hirschmann PN, Brettle D, Cowan A. A preliminary clinical evaluation of the Sens-A-Ray direct digital dental imaging system. Röntgen Centenary Congress London: British Institute of Radiology 1995; 93 (abst).
4. Rushton VE, Homer K. The impact of quality control on radiography in general dental practice. Br Dent J 1995; 179: 254-261.
5. Szymkowiak LE, Sarll DW, Horner K. Some factors affecting the standards of radiography in general dental practice. Br Dent J 1995; 179: 168-174.
6. Langlais RP, Langland OE. Risks from dental radiation in 1995. CD A Journal 1995; 23: 33-39.
7. Pitts, Film-holding, beam-aiming and collimating devices as an aid to standardization in intra-oral radiography: a review. J Dent 1984; 12: 36-46.
8. Patel JR. Intraoral radiographic errors. Oral Surg 1979; 48: 479-483.