Students' attitudes to digital radiography and measurement accuracy of two digital systems in connection with root canal treatment

European Journal of Dental Education

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 167-171

  Wenzel, Ann ^a   Kirkevang, L L ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Digital; Endodontics; Radiography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL STUDENT; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RADIOGRAPHY; STANDARD; TOOTH PULP; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

DENTAL PULP CAVITY; HUMANS; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; STUDENTS, DENTAL;

EID: 16644403407     PISSN: 13965883     EISSN: 16000579     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2004.00347.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Wenzel A. Matters to consider when implementing direct digital radiography in the dental office. Int J Comput Dent 1999: 2: 269-290.
2. Hintze H, Wenzel A. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of sixdigital and two conventional radiographic systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002: 31: 44-49.
3. Hintze H, Wenzel A, Frydenberg M. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002: 31: 170-175.
4. Shearer AC, Horner K, Wilson NHF. Radiovisiography for imaging root canals: an in vitro comparison with conventional radiography. Quintessence Int 1990: 21: 789-794.
5. Shearer AC, Horner K, Wilson NHF. Radiovisiography for length estimation in root canal treatment: an in-vitro comparison with conventional radiography. Int Endod J 1991: 24: 233-239.
6. Sanderink GCH,Huiskens R, van der Stelt PF, Welander U, Stheeman SE. Image quality of direct digital intraoral x-ray sensors in assessing root canal length. The RadioVisio-Graphy, Visualix, Sens-A-Ray, and Flash Dent systems compared with Ektaspeed films. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994: 78: 125-132.
7. Velders XL, Sanderink GCH, van der Stelt PF. Dose reduction of two digital sensor systems measuring file length. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996: 81: 607-612.
8. Versteeg KH, Sanderink GCH, van Ginkel FC, van der Stelt PF. Estimating distances on direct digital images and conventional radiographs. JADA 1997: 128: 439-443.
9. Hedrick RT, Dove B, Peters DD, McDavid WD. Radiographic determination of canal length: direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography. J Endod 1994: 7: 320-326.
10. Farman AG, Farman TT. RVG-ui: a sensor to rival direct exposure intra-oral x-ray film. Int J Comp Dent 1999: 2: 183-196.
11. Ludlow J, Mol A. Image-receptor performance: a comparison of Trophy RVG UI sensor and Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001: 91: 109-119.
12. Vandre RH, Pajak JC, Abdel-Nabi H, Farman TT, Farman AG. Comparison of observer performance in determining the position of endodontic files with physical measures in the evaluation of dental x-ray imaging systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000: 29: 216-222.
13. Shearer AC, Mullane E, Macfarlane TV, Gröndahl H-G, Horner K. Three phosphor plate systems and film compared for imaging of root canals. Int Endod J 2001: 34: 275-279.
14. Scarfe WC, Potter BJ, Farman AG. Effects of instruction on the knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of dental students towards digital radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996: 25: 103-108.
15. Okamura K, Tanaka T, Yoshiura K, Tokumori K, Yuasa K, Kanda S. Integration of a picture archiving and communication system with videocapture and computed radiography in a dental hospital. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001: 30: 172-178.
16. Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A. Integration of multiple direct digital imaging sources in a picture archiving and communication system (PACS). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003: 32: 337-342.
17. Wenzel A, Møystad A. Experience of Norwegian general dental practitioners with solid state and storage phosphor detectors. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001: 30: 203-208.
18. Versteeg CH, Sanderink GCH, van Ginkel FC, van der Stelt PF. An evaluation of periapical radiography with a charge-coupled device. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998: 27: 97-101.
19. Bahrami G, Hagstrøm C, Wenzel A. Bitewing examination with four digital receptors. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003: 32: 317-321.