Dynamic agricultural non-point source assessment tool (DANSAT): Model application

Biosystems Engineering

Volumn 102, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 500-515

  Cho, Jaepil ^a,b   Mostaghimi, Saied ^a  

^a State University   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; AGRICULTURE; SEDIMENTS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STREAM FLOW; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHEDS;

AGRICULTURAL WATERSHEDS; BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE (BMPS); CONTINUOUS SIMULATION; DISTRIBUTED PARAMETER; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL; TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL VARIATION; WATERSHED MANAGERS;

DISTRIBUTED PARAMETER CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 62649156732     PISSN: 15375110     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2009.01.012     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ambroise B., Perrin J.L., and Reutenauer D. Multicriterion validation of a semidistributed conceptual model of the water cycle in the Fecht Catchment (Vosges Massif, France). Water Resources Research 31 6 (1995) 1467-1481
2. Anderton S., Latron J., and Gallart F. Sensitivity analysis and multi-response, multi-criteria evaluation of a physically based distributed model. Hydrological Processes 16 2 (2002) 333-353
3. Arnold J.G., Srinivasan R., Muttiah R.S., and Williams J.R. Large-area hydrologic modeling and assessment: part I. Model development. Journal of American Water Resources Association 34 1 (1998) 73-89
4. Beven K. Changing ideas in hydrology-the case of physically based models. Journal of Hydrology 105 1989 (1989) 157-172
5. Bicknell B.R., Imhoff J.C., Kittle Jr. J.L., Donigian Jr. A.S., and Johanson R.C. Hydrologic Simulation Program-FORTRAN (HSPF): User's Manual for Release 10. Report No. EPA/600/R-93/174 (1993), U.S. EPA Environmental Research Lab, Athens, GA
6. Bingner RL; Theurer FD (2001). Topographic factors for RUSLE in the continuous-simulation watershed model for predicting agricultural, non-point source pollutants (AnnAGNPS), In: Soil Erosion Research For the 21st Century. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 3-5 January, 2001.
7. Borah D.K., and Bera M. Watershed-scale hydrologic and nonpoint-source pollution models: review of mathematical bases. Transactions of the ASAE 46 6 (2003) 1553-1566
8. Bouraoui F (1994). Development of a continuous, physically based, distributed parameter, nonpoint source model. Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.
9. Bouraoui F., Braud I., and Dillaha T.A. Answers: A Nonpoint Source Pollution Model for Water, Sediment and Nutrient Losses (2002), Water Resources Publications, Colorado, USA 833-882
10. Byne W (2000). Predicting Sediment Detachment and Channel Scour in the Process-based Planning Model ANSWERS-2000. M.S. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, 273 pp.
11. Cho J (2007). A comprehensive modeling approach for BMP impact assessment considering surface and groundwater interaction. Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.
12. Cho J., and Mostaghimi S. Dynamic agricultural nonpoint source assessment tool (DANSAT): model development. Biosystems Engineering 102 4 (2009) 486-499
13. Donigian Jr. A.S. Watershed Model Calibration and Validation: The HSPF Experience, National TMDL Science and Policy 2002 Specialty Conference, 30:1 (2002), Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, Virginia
14. ESRI. Arc View GIS. Version 3.1 (1998), Environmental Systems Research Systems, Inc, Redlands, CA
15. Ferreira V.A., Weesies G.A., Yoder D.C., Foster G.R., and Renard K.G. The site and condition specific nature of sensitivity analysis. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 50 5 (1995) 493-497
16. Haan C.T., and Zhang J. Impact of uncertain knowledge of model parameters on estimated runoff and phosphorus loads in the Lake Okeechobee basin. Transactions of the ASAE 39 2 (1996) 511-516
17. Legates D.R., and McCabe Jr. G.J. Evaluating the use of "goodness-of-fit" measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resources Research 35 1 (1999) 233-241
18. Ma Q.L., Wauchope R.D., Hook J.E., Johnson A.W., Truman C.C., Dowler C.C., Gascho G.J., Davis J.G., Sumner H.R., and Chandler L.D. GLEAMS, Opus, and PRZM-2 model predicted versus measured runoff from a coastal plain loamy sand. Transactions of the ASAE 41 1 (1998) 77-88
19. Moriasi D.N., Arnold J.G., Van Liew M.W., Bingner R.L., Harmel R.D., and Veith T.L. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE 50 3 (2007) 885-900
20. Mostaghimi S; McClellan PW; Tim US; Carr JC; Byler KK; Dillaha TA; Shanholtz VO; Pratt JR (1989a). Watershed/water quality monitoring for evaluating animal waste BMP effectiveness: Owl Run Pre-BMP evaluation: Final report: Report No. O-P1-8906.
21. Mostaghimi S., Tim U.S., McClellan P.W., Carr J.C., Byler R.K., Dillaha T.A., Shanoltz V.O., and Pratt J.R. Watershed/Water Quality Monitoring for Evaluating BMP Effectiveness: Nomini Creek watershed. Pre-BMP Evaluation Final Report No. N-P1-8906 (1989), Virginia Department of Conservation and Historic Resources, Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Richmond, Va
22. Nash J.E., and Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part 1-A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10 3 (1970) 282-292
23. Niu Z., Sun G., McNulty S.G., Xie M., and Byne W. Applying ANSWERS-2000 to simulate BMP effects on sediment and runoff from two watersheds in the Three Gorges area, southern China. In: Ascough II J.C., and Flanagan D.C. (Eds). Soil Erosion Research For the 21st Century. Proceedings of the International Symposium, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 3-5 January, 2001 (2001), American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St Joseph, USA 653-656
24. Pennell K.D., Hornsby A.G., Jessup R.E., and Rao P.S.C. Evaluation of five simulation models for predicting aldicarb and bromide behaviour under field conditions. Water Resources Research 26 11 (1990) 2679-2693
25. Petro J.H. Soil Survey of Fauquier County, Virginia. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (1956), Washington, DC
26. Refsgaard J.C. Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models. Journal of Hydrology 198 1/4 (1997) 69-97
27. Refsgaard J.C., and Knudsen J. Operational validation and intercomparison of different types of hydrological models. Water Resources Research 32 7 (1996) 2189-2202
28. Refsgaard J.C., and Storm B. Mike she. In: Singh V.P. (Ed). Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology (1995), Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, CO 809-846
29. Refsgaard J.C., van der Sluijs J.P., Hojberg A.L., and Vanrolleghem P.A. Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process - A framework and guidance. Environmental Modelling & Software 22 11 (2007) 1543-1556
30. Xevi E., Christiaens K., Espino A., Sewnandan W., Mallants D., Sorensen H., and Feyen J. Calibration, validation and sensitivity analysis of the MIKE-SHE model using the Neuenkirchen catchment as case study. Water Resources Management 11 3 (1997) 219-242