Visual function-specific perimetry to identify glaucomatous visual loss using three different definitions of visual field abnormality

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 1234-1240

  Tafreshi, Ali ^a   Sample, Pamela A ^a   Liebmann, Jeffrey M ^b   Girkin, Christopher A ^c   Zangwill, Linda M ^a   Weinreb, Robert N ^a   Lalezary, Maziar ^a   Racette, Lyne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NEW YORK EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; FEMALE; FREQUENCY DOUBLING TECHNOLOGY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPTIC DISK; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHORT WAVELENGTH AUTOMATED PERIMETRY; VISION; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROC CURVE; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL DISORDER; VISUAL FIELD;

FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PERIMETRY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 62649127096     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-2535     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Weinreb RN, Khaw PT. Primary open-angle glaucoma. Lancet. 2004;363:1711-1720.
2. San Laureano J. When is glaucoma really glaucoma? Clin Exp Optom. 2007;90:376-3 85.
3. Sample PA, Medeiros FA, Racette L, et al. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:3381-339.
4. Anderson RS. The psychophysics of glaucoma: improving the structure/function relationship. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2006;25:79-97.
5. Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Color perimetry for assessment of primary open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;31:1869-1875.
6. Racette L, Sample PA. Short-wavelength automated perimetry. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2003;16:227-236, vi-vii.
7. Johnson CA, Brandt JD, Khong AM, Adams AJ. Short-wavelength automated perimetry in low-, medium-, and high-risk ocular hypertensive eyes: initial baseline results. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:70-76.
8. Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Casson EJ, Brandt JD. Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:645-650.
9. Quigley HA. Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125:819-829.
10. Maddess T, Goldberg I, Dobinson J, Wine S, Welsh AH, James AC. Testing for glaucoma with the spatial frequency doubling illusion. Vision Res. 1999;39:4258-4273.
11. Johnson CA, Samuels SJ. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:413-425.
12. Sample PA, Bosworth CF, Blumenthal EZ, Girkin C, Weinreb RN. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:1783-1790.
13. Racette L, Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Ng D, Weinreb RN, Sample PA. Diagnostic accuracy of the Matrix 24-2 and original N-30 frequencydoubling technology tests compared with standard automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:954-960.
14. Johnson CA. Selective versus nonselective losses in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 1994;3(suppl):S32-S44,.
15. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, Bengtsson B. Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial: design and baseline data. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:2144-2153.
16. Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Quigg JM, Cello KE, Kass MA, Gordon MO. Confirmation of visual field abnormalities in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:1187-1194.
17. Artes PH, Chauhan BC. Longitudinal changes in the visual field and optic disc in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2005;24:333-354.
18. Gardiner SK, Anderson DR, Fingeret M, McSoley JJ, Johnson CA. Evaluation of decision rules for frequency-doubling technology screening tests. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83:432-437.
19. Johnson CA, Sample PA, Zangwill LM, et al. Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): II. Comparison of optic disk and visual field characteristics. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:148-154.
20. Bengtsson B, Olsson J, Heijl A, Rootzen H. A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1997;75:368-375.
21. Sample PA, Johnson CA, Haegerstrom-Portnoy G, Adams AJ. Optimum parameters for short-wavelength automated perimetry. J Glaucoma. 1996;5:375-383.
22. Bengtsson B. A new rapid threshold algorithm for short-wavelength automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:1388-94.
23. Kelly DH. Frequency doubling in visual responses. J Opt Soc Am. 1966;56:1628-1633.
24. Maddess T. Performance of nonlinear visual units in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Clin Vision Sci. 1992;7:371-383.
25. Maddess T, Hemmi JM, James AC. Evidence for spatial aliasing effects in the Y-like cells of the magnocellular visual pathway. Vision Res. 1998;38:1843-1859.
26. Anderson AJ, Johnson CA. Mechanisms isolated by frequencydoubling technology perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:398-401.
27. White AJ, Sun H, Swanson WH, Lee BB. An examination of physiological mechanisms underlying the frequency-doubling illusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:3590-3599.
28. Turpin A, McKendrick AM, Johnson CA, Vingrys AJ. Performance of efficient test procedures for frequency-doubling technology perimetry in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:709-715.
29. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837-845.
30. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.