Evaluation of decision rules for frequency-doubling technology screening tests

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 83, Issue 7, 2006, Pages

  Gardiner, Stuart K ^a   Anderson, Douglas R ^b   Fingeret, Murray ^c   Mcsoley, John J ^b   Johnson, Chris A ^a  

^a DEVERS EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision rules; Frequency doubling technology; Glaucoma; Perimetry; Screening

Indexed keywords

DISEASES; FREQUENCY DOUBLERS; PATIENT TREATMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

DECISION RULES; FREQUENCY-DOUBLING TECHNOLOGY; GLAUCOMA; PERIMETRY;

DECISION MAKING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FREQUENCY DOUBLING TECHNOLOGY PERIMETRY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PERIMETER; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TECHNOLOGY; VISUAL FIELD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISION SCREENING; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33746644787     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000225912.06027.ac     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:389-93.
2. Leske MC, Connell AM, Schachat AP, Hyman L. The Barbados Eye Study. Prevalence of open angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:821-9.
3. Dielemans I, Vingerling JR, Wolfs RC, Hofman A, Grobbee DE, de Jong PT. The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in a population-based study in The Netherlands. The Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1851-5.
4. Varma R, Ying-Lai M, Francis BA, Nguyen BB, Deneen J, Wilson MR, Azen SP. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension in Latinos: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2004;111:1439-48.
5. Ramakrishnan R, Nirmalan PK, Krishnadas R, Thulasiraj RD, Tielsch JM, Katz J, Friedman DS, Robin AL. Glaucoma in a rural population of southern India: the Aravind comprehensive eye survey. Ophthalmology 2003;110:1484-90.
6. Mitchell P, Smith W, Attebo K, Healey PR. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology 1996;103:1661-9.
7. King-Smith PE, Grigsby SS, Vingrys AJ, Benes SC, Supowit A. Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation. Vision Res 1994;34:885-912.
8. Bengtsson B, Olsson J, Heijl A, Rootzen H. A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1997;75:368-75.
9. Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Katz J, Royall RM, Quigley HA, Javitt J. Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. JAMA 1991;266:369-74.
10. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Singh K, Quigley HA, Gottsch JD, Javitt J, Sommer A. A population-based evaluation of glaucoma screening: the Baltimore Eye Survey. Am J Epidemiol 1991;134:1102-10.
11. Harasymowycz P, Kamdeu Fansi A, Papamatheakis D. Screening for primary open-angle glaucoma in the developed world: are we there yet? Can J Ophthalmol 2005;40:477-86.
12. Grodum K, Heijl A, Bengtsson B. A comparison of glaucoma patients identified through mass screening and in routine clinical practice. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2002;80:627-31.
13. Sommer A, Tielsch JM, Katz J, Quigley HA, Gottsch JD, Javitt J, Singh K. Relationship between intraocular pressure and primary open angle glaucoma among white and black Americans. The Baltimore Eye Survey. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:1090-5.
14. Sponsel WE, Ritch R, Stamper R, Higginbotham EJ, Anderson DR, Wilson MR, Zimmerman TJ. The Prevent Blindness America Glaucoma Advisory Committee. Prevent Blindness America visual field screening study. Am J Ophthalmol 1995;120:699-708.
15. Quigley HA. Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Am J Ophthalmol 1998;125:819-29.
16. Mansberger SL, Johnson CA, Cioffi GA, Choi D, Krishnadas SR, Srinivasan M, Balamurugan V, Kim U, Smith SD, Wilkins JH, Gritz DC. Predictive value of frequency doubling technology perimetry for detecting glaucoma in a developing country. J Glaucoma 2005;14:128-34.
17. Johnson C, Cioffi G, Van Buskirk E. Evaluation of two screening tests for frequency doubling technology perimetry. In: Wall M, Wild JM, eds. Perimetry Update 1998/1999: Proceedings of the XIIIth International Perimetric Society Meeting; Gardone Riviera (BS), Italy; September 6-9, 1998. The Hague: Kugler; 1999: 103-9.
18. Johnson CA, Sample PA, Cioffi GA, Liebmann JR, Weinreb RN. Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. Criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP). Am J Ophthalmol 2002;134:177-85.
19. Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, Keltner JL, Miller JP, Parrish 2nd, RK Wilson MR, Gordon MO. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:701-13.
20. Gardiner SK, Crabb DP. Examination of different pointwise linear regression methods for determining visual field progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:1400-7.
21. Artes PH, Nicolela MT, McCormick TA, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC. Effects of blur and repeated testing on sensitivity estimates with frequency doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:646-52.
22. Tatemichi M, Nakano T, Tanaka K, Hayashi T, Nawa T, Iwasaki A, Miyamoto T, Hiro H, Sugita M. Laterality of the performance of glaucoma mass screening using frequency-doubling technology. J Glaucoma 2003;12:221-5.
23. Cioffi GA, Mansberger S, Spry P, Johnson CA, Van Buskirk EM. Frequency doubling perimetry and the detection of eye disease in the community. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2000;98:195-9.