Group judgment processes and outcomes in video-conferencing versus face-to-face groups

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 59, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 875-897

  Credé, Marcus ^a   Sniezek, Janet A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; GROUPWARE; VIDEO CONFERENCING;

COMPUTER MEDIATED DECISION MAKING; COMPUTER MEDIATED INTERACTION; GROUP JUDGEMENT PROCESSES;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 0346361660     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adrianson, L., Hjelmquist, E., 1991. Group processes in face-to-face and computer mediated communication. Behavior and Information Technology 10, 281-296.
2. Baltes, B.B., Dickson, M.W., Sherman, M.P., Bauer, C.C., LaGanke, J., 2002. Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: a meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 87, 156-179.
3. Benbasat, I., Lim, J., 2000. Information technology support for debiasing group judgments: an empirical evaluation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 83, 167-183.
4. Chernyshenko, O.S., Sniezek, J.A., 2000. Video-conferencing technology and group decision-making: studying the effects of discussion manipulation on the individual and group judgment. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making, New Orleans, LA, November 2000.
5. Colquitt, J.A., Hollenbeck, J.R., Ilgen, D.R., LePine, J.A., Sheppard, L., 2002. Computer-assisted communication and team decision-making performance: the moderating effect of openness to experience. Journal of Applied Psychology 87, 402-410.
6. Cooper, M.R., Wood, M.T., 1974. Effects of member participation and commitment in group decision making on influence, satisfaction, and decision riskiness. Journal of Applied Psychology 59, 127-134.
7. Daly Jones, O., Monk, A., Watts, L., 1998. Some advantages of video conferencing over high-quality audio conferencing: fluency and awareness of attentional focus. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 49, 21-58.
8. Damian, H.D.E., Eberlein, A., Shaw, M.L.G., Gaines, B.R., 2000. The effects of communication media on group performance in requirements engineering. IEEE Software, May/June 28-36.
9. Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S., 1994. Group, sub-group, and nominal group idea generation: new rules for a new media? Journal of Management 20, 723-736.
10. Dennis, A.R., Nunamaker, J.F., Vogel, D.R., 1991. A comparison of laboratory and field research in the study of electronic meeting systems. Journal of Management Information Systems 7 (3), 107-135.
11. Dennis, A.R., Kinney, A.R., Hung, S.T., Caisy, Y., 1999. Gender differences in the effects of media richness. Small Group Research 30, 405-437.
12. DeSanctis, G., Gallupe, R.B., 1987. A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science 33 (5), 589-609.
13. Duarte, D.L., Snyder, N.T., 1999. Mastering Virtual Teams. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
14. El-Shinnawy, M., Ajaz, S., 1997. Technology, culture and persuasiveness: a study of choce-shifts in group settings. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 47, 473-496.
15. Fjermestad, J.H., Hiltz, S.R., 1997. Experimental studies of group decision support systems: an assessment of variables studied and methodology. Proceedings of the 13 Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, Hawaii, 2 January 1997, pp. 45-53.
16. Gurnee, H., 1937. A comparison of collective and individual judgments of fact. Journal of Experimental Psychology 21, 106-112.
17. Heath, C., Gonzalez, R., 1995. Interaction with others increases decision confidence but not decision quality: evidence against information collection views of interactive decision making. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 61, 305-326.
18. Hedlund, J., Ilgen, D.R., Hollenbeck, J.R., 1998. Decision accuracy in computer-mediated versus face-to-face decision-making teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76, 30-47.
19. Hiltz, S.R., 1982. The impact of a computerized conferencing system on the productivity of scientific research communities. Behaviour & Information Technology 1, 185-195.
20. Hiltz, S.R., Johnson, K., Turoff, M., 1986. Experiments in group decision making: communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communications Research 13, 225-252.
21. Hobman, E.V., Bordia, P., Irmer, B., Chang, A., 2002. The expression of conflict in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research 33, 439-465.
22. Hollingshead, A.B., McGrath, J.E., 1995. Computer-assisted groups: a critical review of the empirical research. In: Guzzo, R.A., E. Salas, and Associates (Eds.), Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 46-78.
23. Janis, I.L., 1972. Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Houghton Miiflin, Boston, MA.
24. Jonassen, D.H., Kwon, H.I., 2001. Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development 49, 35-51.
25. Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., 1992. Group decision making and communication technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 52, 96-123.
26. Kirchler, E., Davis, J.H., 1986. The influence of member status differences and task type on group consensus and member position change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 83-91.
27. Littlepage, G.E., Schmidt, G.W., Whisler, E.W., Frost, A.G., 1995. An input-process-output analysis of influence and performance in problem-solving groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69, 877-889.
28. McLeod, C., Campbell, L., 1992. Memory accessibility and probability judgments: an experimental evaluation of the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 63, 890-902.
29. McLeod, P.L., Baron, R.S., Marti, M.W., Yoon, K., 1997. The eyes have it: minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion. Journal of Applied Psychology 82, 706-718.
30. Moorhead, G., Neck, C.P., West, M.S., 1998. The tendency toward defective decision making within self-managing teams: the relevance of groupthink for the 21st century. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 73, 327-351.
31. Olaniran, B.A., 1996. A model of group satisfaction in computer-mediated communication and face-to-face meetings. Behaviour and Information Technology 15, 24-36.
32. Olson, J.S., Olson, G.M., Meader, D., 1997. Face-to-face group work compared to remote group work with and without video. In: Finn, K.E., Sellen, A.J., Wilbur, S.B. (Eds.), Video-Mediated Communication: Computers, Cognition, and Work. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 157-172.
33. Poole, M.S., Holmes, M., Watson, R., DeSanctis, G., 1993. Group decision support systems and group communication: a comparison of decision making in computer-supported and non-supported groups. Communication Research 20, 176-213.
34. Rohrbaugh, J.W., 1979. Improving the quality of group judgment: social judgment analysis and the Delphi technique. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 24, 73-92.
35. Savadori, L., Van Swol, L.M., Sniezek, J.A., 2001. Information sampling and confidence within groups and judge advisor systems. Communication Research 28, 737-771.
36. Savicki, V., Kelley, M., Lingenfelter, D., 1996. Gender, group composition, and task type in small task groups using computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior 12, 549-565.
37. Sniezek, J.A., 1992. Groups under uncertainty: an examination of confidence in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 52, 124-155.
38. Sniezek, J.A., Henry, R.A., 1989. Accuracy and confidence in group judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 43, 1-28.
39. Sniezek, J.A., Henry, R.A., 1990. Revision, weighting and commitment in consensus group judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 45, 66-84.
40. Sproull, L., Kiesler, S., 1986. Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science 32, 1492-1512.
41. Stasser, G., Titus, W., 1985. Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48, 1467-1478.
42. Sumner, M., Hostetler, D., 2002. A comparative study of computer conferencing and face-to-face communications in systems design. Journal of Interaction Learning Research 13, 277-291.
43. Thompson, L.F., Coovert, M.D., 2002. Stepping up to the challenge: a critical re-examination of face-to-face and computer-mediated team decision-making. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 6, 52-64.
44. Townsend, A.M., Demarie, S.M., Hendrickson, A.R., 2001. Desktop video conferencing in virtual workgroups: anticipation, system evaluation and performance. Information Systems Journal 11, 213-226.
45. Turoff, M., Hiltz, S.R., 1982. Computer support for group versus individual decisions. IEEE Transactions on Communications (COM-30:1), 30, 82-90.
46. Valacich, J.S., Schwenk, C., 1995. Devil's advocate and dialectical inquiry effects on face-to-face and computer-mediated group decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 63, 158-173.
47. Walther, J.B., 1996. Computer-mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research 23, 3-43.