Higher modes in simplified inelastic seismic analysis of single column bent viaducts

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 95-114

  Isaković, Tatjana ^a   Fischinger, Matej ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Bridges; Higher modes; Inelastic analysis; Pushover analysis; Simplified seismic analysis; Viaducts

Indexed keywords

BRIDGES; COLUMNS (STRUCTURAL); DEFORMATION; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; ELASTICITY; REINFORCED CONCRETE;

INELASTIC ANALYSIS; PUSHOVER ANALYSIS; SIMPLIFIED SEISMIC ANALYSIS; VIADUCTS;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

BRIDGE; COLUMN; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; SEISMIC RESPONSE; VIADUCT;

EID: 29644436243     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.535     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Chopra AK, Goel RK. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:561-582, DOI: 10.1002/cqe.144.
2. Chopra AK, Goel RK. Evaluation of modal and FEMA pushover analyses: SAC buildings. Earthquake Spectra 2004; 20(1):225-254.
3. Reinhorn AM. Inelastic analysis techniques in seismic evaluations. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes, Bled, Slovenia, 1997; 277-288.
4. De Rue GM. Nonlinear static procedure analysis of 3D structures for design applications. Master Thesis, University of New York at Buffalo, August 1998.
5. Aydinoǧlu MN. An improved pushover procedure for engineering practice: incremental response spectrum analysis IRSA. Proceedings of the International Workshop Performance-Based Seismic Design Concepts and Implementation, Bled, Slovenia, 2004; 345-356.
6. Kappos AJ, Paraskeva TS, Sextos AG. Seismic assessment of a major bridge using modal pushover analysis and dynamic time-history analysis. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational and Experimental Engineering and Science, Madeira, Portugal, 2004.
7. Fischinger M, Isaković T. Inelastic seismic analysis of reinforced concrete viaducts. Structural Engineering International 2003; 13(2):111-118.
8. Pinto AV (ed.). Pseudo-dynamic and Shaking Table Tests on R.C. Bridges. ECOEST and PREC8 Report No. 5, 1996.
9. Saiidi M, Sozen MA. Simple nonlinear seismic analysis of RC structures. Journal of Structural Division (ASCE) 1981; 107:937-952.
10. Prakash V, Powell GH, Campbell S. Drain-2DX, Base program description and user guide, version 1.10, November 1993.
11. Vidic T, Fajfar P, Fischinger M. Consistent inelastic design spectra: strength and displacement. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1994; 23:507-521.
12. EC8/2 - Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance - Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, prEN 1998-1:200X/Draft 6 (pr Stage 49), CEN, Brussels, January 2003.
13. Fajfar P, Gašperšič, Drobnič D. A simplified nonlinear method for seismic damage analysis of structures. Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes: Proceedings of the International Workshop, Bled, Slovenia, 1997; 183-194.
14. Isaković T, Fischinger M, Fajfar P. The seismic response of reinforced concrete single-column-bent viaducts designed according to Eurocode 8/2. European Earthquake Engineering 1999; 13(1):3-18.
15. Isaković T, Fischinger M, Kante P. Bridges: when is single mode seismic analysis adequate? Structures and Buildings 2003; 156(SB2):163-173.