How do we know?: Students examine issues of credibility with a complicated multimodal web-based text

Curriculum Inquiry

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 265-285

  Baildon, Mark ^a   Damico, James S ^b  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61549100950     PISSN: 03626784     EISSN: 1467873X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-873X.2009.00443.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Allen, T.J., (2006). The 9/11 faith movement. Alternet. Retrieved July 29, 2006, from http://www.alternet.org/story/37647/
2. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
3. Bakhtin, M. (1973). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics (R.W. Rotsel, Trans.). Ann Arbor, MI: Ardis.
4. Baldry, A., & Thibault, P. J. (2006). Multimodal transcription and text analysis: A multimedia toolkit and coursebook. London: Equinox.
5. Barthes, R. (1977). Image-music-text. New York: Noonday Press.
6. Burbules, N. C. (2001). Paradoxes of the Web: The ethical dimensions of credibility. Library Trends, 49(3), 441-453.
7. Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The risks and promises of information technologies for education. Boulder, CO: Westview.
8. Coiro, J. (2003). Reading comprehension on the Internet: Expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies. Reading Teacher, 56(5), 458-464.
9. Coiro, J., & Dobler, B. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 214-257.
10. Damico, J. S., & Baildon, M. (2007). Reading Web sites in an inquiry-based literacy and social studies classroom. In D. Rowe & R. T. Jimenez (Eds.), National Reading Conference yearbook (pp. 204-217). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
11. Damico, J., Baildon, M., & Campano, G. (2005). Integrating literacy, technology and disciplined inquiry in social studies: The development and application of a conceptual model. T.H.E.N. (Journal about Technology, Humanities, Education, & Narrative), 2. Retrieved December 30, 2008, from http://thenjournal.orgAsfeature/92/
12. Delandshire, G. (2002). Assessment as inquiry. Teachers College Record, 104(7), 1461-1484.
13. Derrida, J. (1974). Of grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14. Dimitriadis, G., & McCarthy, G. (2001). Reading and teaching the postcolonial: From Baldwin to Basquiat and beyond. New York: Teachers College Press.
15. Durrant, C., & Green, B. (2001). Literacy and the new technologies in school education: Meeting the l(IT)eracy challenge. In H. Fehring & P. Green (Eds.), Critical literacy: A collection of articles from the Australia Literacy Educators' Association (pp. 142-164). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
16. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
17. Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
18. Fairclough, N. (2005). Critical discourse analysis. Marges Linguistiques, 9, 76-94. Retrieved February 7, 2007, from http://www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/profiles/263
19. Green, B. (1988). Subject-specific literacy and school learning: A focus on writing. Australian Journal of Education, 32(2), 156-179.
20. Hartman, D. K. (1995). Eight readers reading: The intertextual links of proficient readers using multiple passages. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(3), 520-561.
21. Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1988). Social semiotics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
22. Hofstadter, R. (1964, November). The paranoid style in American politics. Harper's Magazine, pp. 77-86. Retrieved March 27, 2005, from http://karws.gso.uri.edu/JFK/conspiracy_theory/the_paranoid_mentality/ The_paranoid_style.html
23. Hull, G. A., & Nelson, M. E. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communications, 22(2), 224-261.
24. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. New York: Routledge.
25. Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. New York: Columbia University Press.
26. Lankshear, C., Peters, M., & Knobel, M. (2000). Information, knowledge, and learning: Some issues facing epistemology and education in a digital age. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 34(1), 17-39.
27. Lasch, C. (1984). The minimal self: Psychic survival in troubled times. New York: Norton.
28. Levstik, L., & Barton, K. (2001). Doing history: Investigating with children in elementary and middle schools. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30. Luke, C. (2003). Pedagogy, connectivity, multimodality, and interdisciplinarity. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3), 397-403.
31. New London Group. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 9-37). London: Routledge.
32. Nixon, H. (2003). New research literacies for contemporary research into literacy and new media? Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3), 386-413.
33. Sales, N. J. (2006). Click here for conspiracy. Vanity Fair. Retrieved December 28, 2006, from http://www.vanityfair.com/commentary/content/ printables/060717roco02?print=true
34. Segall, A. (1999). Critical history: Implications for history/social studies education. Theory and Research in Social Education, 27, 358-374.
35. Sipe, L. (1998). How picture books work: A semiotically framed theory of text-picture relationships. Children's Literature in Education, 29(2), 97-108.
36. Sonesson, G. (2002). The varieties of interpretation: A view from semiotics. Revista Galáxia, 2(4). Retrieved January 12, 2007, from http://www.text-semiotics.org/english3.html
37. Stake, R. (1994). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 246-247). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38. Stone, M., & Parker, T. (2006, October 11). South Park: Mystery of the urinal deuce [Television series episode]. Retrieved January 12, 2007, from http://www.vidpeek.com
39. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40. Warnick, B. (2003, October). Online ethos: Source credibility in an "authorless" environment. Paper presented at the Association of Internet Researchers Conference, Toronto, ON. Retrieved June 27, 2006, from http://faculty.washington.edu/barbwarn/Ethospaper1.htm
41. Werner, W. (2002). Reading visual texts. Theory and Research in Social Education, 30(3), 401-428.
42. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
43. Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.