Effects of time pressure and communication environment on team processes and outcomes in dyadic planning

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 67, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 411-423

  van der Kleij, Rick ^a   Lijkwan, Jameela T E ^b   Rasker, Peter C ^a   De Dreu, Carsten K W ^c  

^a TNO   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Computer supported cooperative work; Distributed teamwork; Dyadic planning; Electronic communication; Time pressure; Virtual teams

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; GROUPWARE;

COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; DISTRIBUTED TEAMWORK; DYADIC PLANNING; ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION; TIME PRESSURE; VIRTUAL TEAMS;

RADIO COMMUNICATION;

EID: 61449236287     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: 10959300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Arrow H., Poole M.S., Henry K.B., Wheelan S., and Moreland R. Time, change, and development: the temporal perspective on groups. Small Group Research 35 (2004) 73-105
2. Baltes B.B., Dickson M.W., Sherman M.P., Bauer C.C., and LaGanke J.S. Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: a meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 87 (2002) 156-179
3. Caballer A., Gracia F., and Peiró J.M. Affective responses to work process and outcomes in virtual teams. Effects of communication media and time pressure. Journal of Managerial Psychology 20 (2005) 245-260
4. Carroll J.M., Rosson M.B., Convertino G., and Ganoe C.H. Awareness and teamwork in computer-supported collaborations. Interacting with Computers 18 (2006) 21-46
5. Daft R.L., and Lengel R.H. Information richness: a new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. Research in Organizational Behavior 6 (1984) 191-233
6. Daft R.L., and Lengel R.H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science 32 (1986) 554-571
7. De Dreu C.K.W. Time pressure and closing of the mind in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 91 (2003) 280-295
8. De Grada E., Kruglanski A.W., Mannetti L., and Pierro A. Motivated cognition and group interaction: need for closure affects the contents and processes of collective negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35 (1999) 346-365
9. Dennis A.R. Information exchange and use in small group decision making. Small Group Research 27 (1996) 532-550
10. Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S., 1999. Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronity. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Retrieved December 12, 2005, from 〈http://www.hicss.hawaii.edu〉.
11. DeSanctis G., and Gallupe R.B. A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science 33 (1987) 1589-1609
12. Doherty-Sneddon G.D., O'Malley C., Garrod S., Anderson A., Langton S., and Bruce V. Face-to-face and video-mediated communication: a comparison of dialogue structure and task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 3 (1997) 105-125
13. Driskell J.E., Radtke P.H., and Salas E. Virtual teams: effects of technological mediation on team performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 7 (2003) 297-323
14. Durham C.C., Locke E.A., Poon J.M.L., and McLeod P.L. Effects of group goals and time pressure on group efficacy, information-seeking strategy, and performance. Human Performance 13 (2000) 115-138
15. Ellis C.A., Gibbs S.J., and Rein G.L. Groupware: some issues and experiences. Communications of the ACM 34 (1991) 38-58
16. Green S.G., and Taber T.D. The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 25 (1980) 97-106
17. In: Hackman J.R. (Ed). Team that Work, and Those that Don't. Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork (1990), Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA
18. Hancock J.T., and Dunham P.J. Language use in computer-mediated communication: the role of coordination devices. Discourse Processes 31 (2001) 91-110
19. Hayes-Roth B., and Hayes-Roth F. A cognitive model of planning. Cognitive Science 3 (1979) 275-310
20. Hinssen, P.J.H., 1998. What Difference Does it Make? The Use of Groupware in small Groups. Telematica Instituut Fundamental Research Series, no. 002 (TI/FRS/002). Enschede, The Netherlands.
21. Hollingshead A.B., and McGrath J.E. Computer-assisted groups: a critical review of the empirical research. In: Goldstein I.L. (Ed). Frontiers of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1995), Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA 46-78
22. Janicik G.A., and Bartel C.A. Talking about time: effects of temporal planning and time awareness norms on group coordination and performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 7 (2003) 122-134
23. Jarvenpaa S.L., Rao V.S., and Huber G.P. Computer support for meetings of groups working on unstructured problems: a field experiment. Management Information Systems Quarterly 12 (1988) 645-665
24. Jessup L., and Valacich J. Group Support Systems: A New Frontier (1993), MacMillan, New York
25. Karau S.J., and Kelly J.R. The effects of time scarcity and time abundance on group performance quality and interaction process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 28 (1992) 542-571
26. Kelly J.R., and Karau S.J. Group decision making: the effects of initial preferences and time pressure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25 (1999) 1342-1354
27. Kelly J.R., and Loving T.J. Time pressure and group performance: exploring underlying processes in the attentional focus model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40 (2004) 185-198
28. Kelly J.R., and McGrath J.E. Effects of time limits and task types on task performance and interaction of four-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49 (1985) 395-407
29. Kelly J.R., Jackson J.W., and Hutson-Comeaux S.L. The effects of time pressure and task differences on influences modes and accuracy in decision-making groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23 (1997) 10-22
30. Kenny D.A., Kashy D.A., and Bolger N. Data analysis in social psychology. In: Gilbert D.T., Fiske S.T., and Lindzey A. (Eds). The Handbook of Social Psychology vol. 1 (1998), Mcgraw-Hill, Boston, MA 233-265
31. Kiesler S., and Cummings J.N. What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research. In: Hinds P., and Kiesler S. (Eds). Distributed Work (2002), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 57-82
32. Kiesler S., and Sproull L. Group decision making and communication technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 52 (1992) 96-123
33. Kiesler S., Siegel J., and McGuire T.W. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist 39 (1984) 1123-1134
34. Kruglanski A.W., and Freund T. The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 19 (1983) 448-468
35. Lea M., and Spears R. Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation and group decision-making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34 (1991) 283-301
36. Martins L.L., Gilson L.L., and Maynard M.T. Virtual teams? What do we know and where do we go from here?. Journal of Management 30 (2004) 805-835
37. McGrath J.E. Groups: Interaction and Performance (1984), Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ
38. McGrath J.E. Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): a theory of groups. Small Group Research 22 (1991) 147-174
39. McGrath J.E., Arrow H., Gruenfeld D.H., Hollingshead A.B., and O'Connor K.M. Groups, tasks and technology: the effects of experience and change [Special issue]. Small Group Research 24 (1993) 406-420
40. Olson J.S., Olson G.M., and Meader D. Face-to-face group work compared to remote group work with and without video. In: Finn K., Sellen A., and Wilbur S. (Eds). Video-Mediated Communication (1997), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 157-172
41. Poole M.S., and DeSanctis G. Understanding the use of decision support systems: the theory of adaptive structuration. In: Fulk J., and Steinfield C. (Eds). Organizations and Communication Technology (1990), Sage, Newbury Park, CA 175-195
42. Priest H.A., Stagl K.C., Klein C., and Salas E. Virtual teams: creating context for distributed teamwork. In: Bowers C., Salas E., and Jentsch F. (Eds). Creating High-Tech Teams: Practical Guidance on Work Performance and Technology (2006), APA Books, Washington, DC 185-212
43. Salanova M., Llorens S., Cifre E., Martínez I.M., and Schaufeli W.B. Perceived collective efficacy, subjective well-being and task performance among electronic work groups: an experimental study. Small Group Research 34 (2003) 43-73
44. Sellen A.J. Remote conversations: the effects of mediating talk with technology. Human-Computer Interaction 10 (1995) 401-444
45. Siegel J., Dubrovsky V., Kiesler S., and McGuire T.W. Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37 (1986) 157-187
46. Smith D.L., Pruitt D.G., and Carnevale P.J.D. Matching and mismatching: the effect of own limit, other's toughness, and time pressure, on concession rate in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42 (1982) 876-883
47. Smith K.G., Locke E.A., and Barry D. Goal setting, planning, and organizational performance: an experimental simulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 46 (1990) 118-134
48. Sproull L., and Kiesler S. Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science 32 (1986) 1492-1512
49. Stasser G., and Titus W. Pooling of shared and unshared information in group decision making: biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48 (1985) 1467-1478
50. Stasser G., Taylor L.A., and Hanna C. Information sampling in structured discussions of three- and six-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 (1989) 67-78
51. Stout R.J. Planning effects on communication strategies: a shared mental model perspective. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting (1995), Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA 1278-1282
52. Stout R.J., Cannon-Bowers J.A., Salas E., and Milanovich D.M. Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: an empirical link is established. Human Factors 41 (1999) 61-71
53. Straus S.G. Technology, group process, and group outcomes: testing the connections in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Human-Computer Interaction 12 (1997) 227-266
54. Thompson L.F., and Coovert M.D. Teamwork online: the effects of computer conferencing on perceived confusion, satisfaction, and postdiscussion accuracy. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 7 (2003) 135-151
55. Thompson L.F., and Coovert M.D. Understanding and developing virtual computer-supported cooperative work teams. In: Bowers C., Salas E., and Jentsch F. (Eds). Creating High-Tech Teams: Practical Guidance on Work Performance and Technology (2006), APA Books, Washington, DC 213-242
56. Van der Kleij, R., 2007. Overcoming distance in virtual teams: effects of communication media, experience, and time pressure on distributed teamwork. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Amsterdam 〈http://dare.uva.nl/record/234997〉.
57. Van der Kleij R., and Schraagen J.M.C. Enabling team decision making. In: Bowers C., Salas E., and Jentsch F. (Eds). Creating High-Tech Teams: Practical Guidance on Work Performance and Technology (2006), APA Books, Washington, DC 35-50
58. Van der Kleij R., Paashuis R.M., Langefeld J.J., and Schraagen J.M.C. Effects of long-term use of video-communication technologies on the conversational process [Special issue]. International Journal of Cognition, Technology & Work 6 (2004) 57-59
59. Waller M.J., Conte J., Gibson C.B., and Carpenter M.A. The effect of individual perceptions of deadlines on team performance. Academy of Management Review 26 (2001) 586-600
60. Whittaker S. Things to talk about when talking about things. Human-Computer Interaction 18 (2003) 149-170
61. Zaccaro S.J., Gualtieri J., and Minionis D. Task cohesion as a facilitator of team decision making under temporal urgency. Military Psychology 7 (1995) 77-93
62. Zigurs I., and Buckland B. A theory of task/technology fit and group support systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly 22 (1998) 313-334