Concurrent performance of gunner's and robotics operator's tasks in a multitasking environment

Military Psychology

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 98-113

  Chen, Jessie Y C ^a   Joyner, Carla T ^b  

^a U S ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61449190927     PISSN: 08995605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08995600802565785     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Chen, J., Durlach, P., Sloan, J., & Bowens, L. (2008). Human robot interaction in the context of simulated route reconnaissance missions. Military Psychology, 20, 135-149.
2. Chen, J., Haas, E., & Barnes, M. (2007). Human performance issues and user interface design for teleoperated robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part C: Applications and Reviews, 37, 1231-1245.
3. Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. (2002). Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 225-236.
4. Dixon, S., Wickens, C., & Chang, D. (2003). Comparing quantitative model predictions to experimental data in multiple-UAV flight control. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting (pp. 104-108). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
5. Educational Testing Service. (2005). Cube comparison test. Princeton, NJ: Author.
6. Gugerty, L., & Brooks, J. (2004). Reference-frame misalignment and cardinal direction judgments: Group differences and strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10(2), 75-88.
7. Hart, S., & Staveland, L. (1988). Development of NASA TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139-183). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
8. Hill, S., Stachowiak, C., & Tauson, R. (2004). Soldier performance in the enclosed compartment of a moving vehicle. Proceedings of NATO Applied Vehicle Technology Panel Symposium (pp. RTO-MP-AVT-110). Brussels, Belgium: NATO Research and Technology Organization.
9. Horrey, W., & Wickens, C. (2004). Focal and ambient visual contributions and driver visual scanning in lane keeping and hazard detection. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting (pp. 2325-2329). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
10. Kelley, T. Wiley, P., & Lee, F. (2000). Developing an ACT-R model of mental manipulation (No. ARL-TR-2179). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
11. Kennedy, R., Lane, N., Berbaum, K., & Lilienthal, M. (1993). Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhance method for quantifying simulator sickness. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 203-220.
12. Kolasinski, E. (1995). Simulator sickness in virtual environments (Tech. Rep. No. 1027). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute.
13. Luck, J., Allender, L., & Russell, D. (2006). An investigation of real world control of robotic assets under communication latency. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Conference (pp. 202-209). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
14. Mitchell, D. (2005). Soldier workload analysis of the mounted combat system (MCS) Platoon's use of unmanned assets (No. ARL-TR-3476). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
15. Mitchell, D., & Chen, J. (2006). Impacting system design with human performance modeling and experiment: Another success story. Proceedings of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting (pp. 2477-2481). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
16. Murray, S. (1994). Human performance studies for control of multiple remote systems (Tech. Rep. No. NRaD 1658). San Diego, CA: Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command.
17. Neumann, J. (2006). Effect of operator control configuration on unmanned aerial system Trainability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Central Florida.
18. Novak, T., Hoffman, D., & Yung, Y. (2000). Measuring the customer experience in online environments. Marketing Science, 19, 22-42.
19. Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R., & Singh, I. (1993). Performance consequences of automation-induced "complacency." International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 1-23.
20. Rantanen, E., & Goldberg, J. (1999). The effect of mental workload on the visual field size and shape. Ergonomics, 42, 816-834.
21. Richard, C., Wright, R., Ee, C., Prime, S., Shimizu, Y., & Vavrik, J. (2002). Effect of a concurrent auditory task on visual search performance in a driving-related image-flicker task. Human Factors, 44, 108-119.
22. Scanlan, L. (1977). Target acquisition in realistic terrain. In Proceedings of 21st Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society (pp. 249-253).
23. Schipani, S. (2003). An evaluation of operator workload during partially-autonomous vehicle operations. In Proceedings of PerMIS 2003. Retrieved Dec. 5, 2005, from http://www.isd.mel.nist.gov/research-areas/ research-engineering/Performance-Metrics/PerMIS-2003/Proceedings/Schipani.pdf
24. Schumacher, E., Seymour, T., Glass, J., Fencsik, D., Lauber, E., Kieras, D., et al. (2001). Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: Uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Psychological Science, 12(2), 101-108.
25. Thomas, L., & Wickens, C. (2000). Effects of display frame of reference on spatial judgments and change detection (Tech. Rep. No. ARL-00-14). Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Institute of Aviation.
26. Thomas, L., & Wickens, C. (2004). Eye-tracking and individual differences in off-normal event detection when flying with a synthetic vision system display. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Meeting (pp. 223-227). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
27. U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC). (2003). The United States Army objective force operational and organizational plan maneuver unit of action (TRADOC Pamphlet No. 525-3-90 O&O). Fort Knox, KY: Unit of Action Maneuver Battle Lab.
28. Wickens, C. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
29. Wickens, C., Dixon, S., & Chang, D. (2003). Using interference models to predict performance in a multiple-task UAV environment - 2 UAVs (Tech. Rep. No. AHFD-03-9/MAD-03-1). Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Institute of Aviation.
30. Witmer, B., & Singer, M. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7, 225-240.