Reference-frame misalignment and cardinal direction judgments: Group differences and strategies

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 75-88

  Gugerty, Leo ^a   Brooks, Johnell ^a  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COOPERATION; DECISION MAKING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; SPACE PERCEPTION; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 2942685308     PISSN: 1076898X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1076-898X.10.2.75     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aretz, A. (1991). The design of electronic map displays. Human Factors, 33, 85-101.
2. Aretz, A. J., & Wickens, C. D. (1992). The mental rotation of map displays. Human Performance, 5, 303-328.
3. Bethell-Fox, C., & Shepard, R. (1988). Mental rotation: Effects of stimulus complexity and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 12-23.
4. Cheng, M. Y., & Hall, P. (1998). Calibrating the excess mass and dip tests of modality. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Part B, 60, 579-589.
5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Draper, M. H., Geiselman, E. E., Lu, L. G., Roe, M. M., & Haas, M. W. (2000). Display concepts supporting crew communication of target location in unmanned air vehicles. In Proceedings of the XIV Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 3 (pp. 85-88). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
7. Eley, M. G. (1988). Determining the shapes of land surfaces from topographical maps. Ergonomics, 31, 355-376.
8. Estes, W. (1997). On the communication of information by displays of standard errors and confidence intervals. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 330-341.
9. Gentner, D., & Gunn, V. (2001). Structural alignment facilitates noticing of differences. Memory & Cognition, 29, 565-577.
10. Gugerty, L. (2004). Using cognitive task analysis to design multiple synthetic tasks for uninhabited aerial vehicle operation. In S. Schiflett, L. Elliott, E. Salas, & M. Coovert (Eds.), Scaled worlds: Development, validation, and applications (pp. 240-262). London: Ashgate Publishing.
11. Gugerty, L., & Brooks, J. (2001). Seeing where you are heading: Integrating environmental and egocentric reference frames in cardinal direction judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 251-266.
12. Gugerty, L., Brooks, J., & Treadaway, C. (in press). Individual differences in situatuion awareness for transportation tasks. In S. Banbury & S. Tremblay (Eds.), A cognitive approach to situation awareness: Theory, measures and application. London: Ashgate Publishing.
13. Guilford, J. P., & Zimmerman, W. S. (1981). The Guilford-Zimmerman Aptitude Survey: Manual of instructions and interpretations. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
14. Gunzelmann, G., & Anderson, J. (2002). Strategic differences in the coordination of different views of space. In W. D. Gray & C. D. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 387-392). Cincinnati, OH: Cognitive Science Society.
15. Hartwig, F., & Dearing, B. (1979). Exploratory data analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16. Hintzman, D., O'Dell, C., & Arndt, D. (1981). Orientation in cognitive maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 149-206.
17. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
18. Klatzky, R. (1998). Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: Definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. In C. Freksa, C. Habel, & K. Wender (Eds.), Spatial Cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge (pp. 1-17). New York: Springer.
19. Levine, M., Jankovic, I. N., & Palij, M. (1982). Principles of spatial problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 157-175.
20. Loewenstein, J., & Gentner, D. (2001). Spatial mapping in preschoolers: Close comparisons facilitate far mappings. Journal of Cognition and Development, 2, 189-219.
21. Markman, A., & Gentner, D. (1997). The effects of alignability on memory. Psychological Science, 8, 363-367.
22. Presson, C. C., DeLange, N., & Hazelrigg, M. D., (1989). Orientation specificity in spatial memory: What makes a path different from a map of the path? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 887-897.
23. Presson, C. C., & Hazelrigg, M. D. (1984). Building spatial representations through primary and secondary learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 716-722.
24. Shepard, R., & Hurwitz, S. (1984). Upward direction, mental rotation, and discrimination of left and right turns on maps. Cognition, 18, 161-193.
25. Sholl, M. J. (1987). Cognitive maps as orienting schemata. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 615-628.
26. Uttal, D., Gregg, V., Tan, L., Chamberlin, M., & Sines, A. (2001). Connecting the dots: Children's use of a systematic figure to facilitate mapping and search. Developmental Psychology, 37, 338-350.
27. Werner, S., & Jaeger, M. (2002). Intrinsic reference systems in map displays. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 1628-1632). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
28. Werner, S., & Schmidt, K. (1999). Environmental reference systems for large-scale spaces. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 1, 447-473.
29. Wickens, C. (1999). Frames of reference for navigation. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention & performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 113-144). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Wilcox, R., & Keselman, H. (2003). Modern robust data analysis methods: Measures of central tendency. Psychological Methods, 8, 254-274.