Specificity in Clitic Doubling and in Differential Object Marking

Probus

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 33-66

  Leonetti, Manuel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALCALÁ   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61249136072     PISSN: 09214771     EISSN: 16134079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/PROBUS.2008.002     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (68)

1. Abbott, Barbara (1999). Support for a unique theory of definite descriptions. Semantics and Linguistic Theory IX, 1-15. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications
2. Aissen, Judith (2003). Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435-83
3. Alexiadou, Artemis and Elena Anagnostopoulou (1997). Toward a uniform account of scrambling and clitic doubling. In German: Syntactic Problems, Problematic Syntax?, Werner Abraham and Elly van Gelderen (eds.), 143-161. Tübingen: Niemeyer
4. Anagnostopoulou, Elena (1999). Conditions on clitic doubling in Greek. In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), 761-798. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter
5. - (2006). Clitic doubling. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), vol. 1: 519-581. Oxford: Blackwell
6. Ariel, Mira (1990). Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Croom Helm
7. Belloro, Valeria (2007). Spanish clitic-doubling: A study of the syntax-pragmatics interface. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
8. Bleam, Tonia (1999). Leísta Spanish and the syntax of clitic doubling. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Delaware
9. - (2006). The role of semantic type in differential object marking. In Distinction Bare Plurals, Indefinites, and Weak-Strong Distinction. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 19, Svetlana Vogeleer (ed.), 3-27
10. Brugè, Laura and Gerhard Brugger (1996). On the accusative a in Spanish. Probus 8: 1-51
11. Cecchetto, Carlo (1999). A comparative analysis of left and right dislocation in Romance. Studia Linguistica 53: 40-67
12. Corbett, Greville (2006). Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
13. Cuervo, María Cristina (2003). Structural asymmetries but same Spanish word order: the dative alternation in Spanish. In Asymmetry in Grammar, Anna Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), vol 1: 117-144. Amsterdam: Benjamins
14. Déchaine, Rose-Marie and Martina Wiltschko (2002). Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 409-442
15. Delfitto, Denis and Norbert Corver (1998). Feature primitives and the syntax of specificity. Rivista di Linguistica 10: 281-334
16. De Mello, George (2004). Doblaje clítico de objeto directo anillo posverbal: "Lo tengo el anillo". Hispania 87: 336-350
17. Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen (1990). Clitic doubling, wh-movement, and quantification in Romanian. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 351-398
18. Dumitrescu, Domnita (1998). 'A' personal, duplicación porteño vs español madrileño Hispanistas clítica y marcadez: español porteño vs español madrileño. In Actas del XII Congreso de la Asociación Internacional de Hispanistas, A. M. Ward (ed.), vol. 1: 140-152. Birmingham: University of Birmingham
19. Enç, Mürvet (1991). The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 1-26
20. Escandell-Vidal, Victoria (2007). Topics from Ibiza: differential object Ibero-Romance Languages Universität Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft (Arbeitspapier 122) marking and clitic-dislocation. In Proceedings of the Workshop "Definiteness, Specificity and Animacy in Ibero-Romance Languages", Georg A. Kaiser and Manuel Leonetti (eds.), 23-43. Universität Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft (Arbeitspapier 122)
21. Estigarribia, Bruno (2006). Why clitic doubling? A functional analysis of Rioplatense Spanish. In Selected Proceedings of the 8th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Timothy Face and Carol Klee (eds.), 123-136. Sommerville (MA): Cascadilla
22. Farkas, Donka (2002). Specificity distinctions. Journal of Semantics 19. 1-31
23. Farkas, Donka and Klaus von Heusinger (2003). Stability of reference and object marking in Romanian. Unpublished manuscript, UC Santa Cruz/Universität Stuttgart
24. Ferńandez Soriano, Olga (1989). Rección y ligamiento en español. Aspectos del parámetro del sujeto nulo. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
25. - (1999). El pronombre personal. Formas y distribuciones. Pronombres y tónicos átonos y tónicos. In Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte (eds.), vol. 1: 1209-1274. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe
26. Franco, Jon (1993). On object agreement in Spanish. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Southern California
27. - (2000). Agreement as a continuum: The case of Spanish pronominal clitics. In Clitic Phenomena in European Languages, Frans Beukema and Marcel den Dikken (eds.), 147-189. Amsterdam: Benjamins
28. Gabriel, Christoph and Esther Rinke (to appear): Information packaging Spanish and the rise of clitic-doubling in the history of Spanish. In The Role of Information Structure in Language Change, Gisella Ferraresi and Rosemarie Lühr (eds.). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter
29. García Miguel, José María (1991). La duplicación de objeto directo e indirecto como concordancia. Verba 18: 374-410
30. Gundel, Jeanette, Nancy Hedberg and Ron Zacharski (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69: 274-307
31. Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier (2000). The formal semantics of clitic doubling. Journal of Semantics 16: 315-380
32. - (2001). Interface conditions and the semantics of argument clitics. In De Gruyter Current Issues in Spanish Syntax and Semantics, Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach and Luis Silva-Villar (eds.), 107-142. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter
33. - (2002). Constraint interaction at the semantics/pragmatics interface. In Meanings in Contrast. The Cambridge Papers, Katarzyna Jaszczolt and Ken Turner (eds.), 335-354. Amsterdam: Benjamins
34. Heusinger, Klaus von (2002). Specificity and definiteness in sentence and discourse structure. Journal of Semantics 19: 245-274
35. - (this volume) Verbal semantics and the diachronic development of object marking in Spanish differential object marking in Spanish. Probus 20: 1-31
36. Heusinger, Klaus von and Georg A. Kaiser (2003). Animacy, specificity and in Romance Languages Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft (Arbeitspapier 113) definiteness in Spanish. In Proceedings of the Workshop "Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of Specificity in Romance Languages", Klaus von Heusinger and Georg A. Kaiser (eds.), 67-101. Universität Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft (Arbeitspapier 113)
37. - (2005). The evolution of differential object marking in Spanish. In Nominal Determination Systems in Romance Universität Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft (Arbeitspapier 119) Proceedings of the Workshop "Specificity and the Evolution/Emergence of Nominal Determination Systems in Romance ", Klaus von Heusinger, Georg A. Kaiser and Elisabeth Stark (eds.), 33-69. Universität Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft (Arbeitspapier 119)
38. Heusinger, Klaus von and Edgar Onea (this volume). Triggering and Romanian blocking effects in the diachronic development of DOM in Romanian. Probus 20: 67-110
39. Jaeggli, Osvaldo (1982). Topics in Romance Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris
40. - (1986). Three issues in the theory of clitics. In The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics. Syntax and Semantics 19, Hagit Borer (ed.), 15-42. New York: Academic Press
41. Kallulli, Dalina (2006). On existential bare plural 'subjects': They of Linguistics don't exist!. In Bare Plurals, Indefinites, and Weak-Strong Distinction. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 19, Svetlana Vogeleer (ed.), 29-57
42. Kayne, Richard (1975). French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
43. Klein, Udo (2007). Clitic doubling and differential object marking in Romanian. Unpublished manuscript, Universität Stuttgart
44. Laca, Brenda (2006). El objeto directo. La marcación histórica dei español económica / Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México preposicional. In Sintaxis histórica dei español. Primera parte: la frase verbal, Concepción Company (ed.), vol. 1: 423-475. México: Fondo de cultura económica / Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
45. Leonetti, Manuel (2004). Specificity and differential object marking in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 3: 75-114
46. - (2007). Clitics do not encode specificity. In Proceedings of the Ibero-Romance Languages Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft (Arbeitspapier 122) Workshop "Definiteness, Specificity and Animacy in Ibero-Romance Languages", Georg A. Kaiser and Manuel Leonetti (eds.), 111-139. Universität Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft (Arbeitspapier 122)
47. Lidz, Jeffrey (2006). The grammar of accusative case in Kannada. Language 82: 1-23
48. Lipski, John (1996). El español de América. Madrid: Cátedra
49. Lyons, Chris (1999). Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
50. Mayer, Elizabeth (2003). Clitic doubling in Limeño. M.A. dissertation, Australian National University
51. Naess, Åshild (2004). What markedness marks: The markedness problem with direct objects. Lingua 114: 1186-1212
52. Ordóñez, Francisco and Esthela Treviño (1999). Left Spanish dislocated subjects and the pro-drop parameter: A case study of Spanish. Lingua 107: 39-68
53. Parodi, Teresa (1998). Aspects of clitic doubling and clitic clusters in Spanish. In Models of Inflection, Ray Fabri, Albert Ortmann and Teresa Parodi (eds.), 85-102. Tübingen: Niemeyer
54. Roca, Francese (1996). Morfemas objetivos y determinantes: los español. clíticos del español. Verba 23: 83-119
55. Sánchez, Liliana (2003). Quechua-Spanish Bilingualism. Amsterdam: Benjamins
56. - (2005). Doblado de clíticos y focalización exhaustiva en español de Lima León el español de Lima. In Actas del XIV Congreso de ALFAL, Alba Valencia (ed.). México: Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
57. Schmitt, Cristina (1998). Lack of iteration: Accusative clitic doubling, have + agreeing participles participial absolutes, and have + agreeing participles. Probus 10: 243-300
58. Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson (1986). Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell
59. Silva-Corvalán, Carmen (1984). Semantic and pragmatic factors in syntactic change. In Historical Syntax, Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 555-573. Amsterdam / Berlin: Mouton
60. Sportiche, Dominique (1996). Clitic constructions. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring (eds.), 213-276. Dordrecht: Kluwer
61. Suñer, Margarita (1988). The role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 391-434
62. - (1989). Dialectal variation and clitic-doubled direct objects. In Studies in Romance Linguistics, Carl Kirschner and Janet De Cesaris (eds.), 377-395. Amsterdam: Benjamins
63. - (1991). Two properties of clitics in clitic-doubled constructions. In Logical Structure and Linguistic Structure: Crosslinguistic Perspectives, James Huang and Robert May (eds.), 233-251. Dordrecht: Kluwer
64. - (2000). Object shift: Comparing a Romance language to Germanic. Probus 12: 261-289
65. Swart, Peter de and Helen de Hoop (2007). Semantic aspects of differential object marking. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11, Estela Puig Waldmüller (ed.), 598-611. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra
66. Torrego, Esther (1999). El complemento directo preposicional. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte (eds.), vol. 2: 1779-1805. Madrid: Espasa Calpe
67. Tsakali, Vina (2003). A different type of clitic doubling construction. Unpublished manuscript, UCL
68. Uriagereka, Juan (1995). Some aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 79-123