Triggering and blocking effects in the diachronic development of DOM in Romanian

Probus

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 67-110

  Von Heusinger, Klaus ^a   Gáspár, Edgar Onea ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61249085835     PISSN: 09214771     EISSN: 16134079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/PROBUS.2008.003     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Aissen, Judith (2003). Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435-483
2. Alexiadou, Artemis (2006). On the cross-linguistic distribution of (in)definiteness spreading. Handout ÖLT Syntax Workshop, Universität Klagenfurt, 8-9.12.2006. http://ifla.uni-stuttgart.de/artemis/publications.html
3. Alexiadou, Artemis and Elena Anagnostopoulou (1997). Toward a uniform account of scrambling and clitic doubling. In German: Syntactic Problems, Problematic Syntax?, Werner Abraham and Elly van Gelderen (eds.), 143-161. Tübingen: Niemeyer
4. Anagnostopoulou, Elena (1999). Conditions on clitic doubling in Greek. In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), 761-798. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
5. Bossong, Georg (1985). Empirische Universalienforschung. Differentielle neuiranischen Sprachen Objektmarkierung in den neuiranischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Narr
6. Bende-Farkas, Ágnes (2002). Specific indefinites in Romanian and Sprachen the marker PE. Paper presented at "Semantische und syntaktische Aspekte von Spezifizität in Romanischen Sprachen", Universität Konstanz
7. Chiriacescu, Sofiana (2007). Pe-Markierung und Diskurs-Prominenz im Rumänischen. Magisterarbeit. Universität Stuttgart
8. Comorovski, Ileana (1995): On quantifier strength and partitive noun Dordrecht: Kluwer phrases. In Quantification in Natural Languages, Emmon Bach, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer and Barbara H. Partee (eds.), 145-177. Dordrecht: Kluwer
9. Comrie, Bernard (1975). Definite and animate direct objects: a natural class. Linguistica Silesiona 3: 13-21
10. Croft, William (2003). Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
11. Delille, Karl Heinz (1970). Die geschichtliche Entwicklung des Portugiesischen präpositionalen Akkusativs im Portugiesischen. Bonn: Romanisches Seminar
12. Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen (1994). The Syntax of Romanian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
13. - (2007). Article-drop in Romanian and extended heads. In Pitar Mos: A Building with a View, Gabriela Alboiu et. al. (eds.), 99-107. Bucharest: Bucharest University Press
14. Enç, Mürvet (1991). The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 1-25
15. Farkas, Donka (1978). Direct and indirect object reduplication in Society (CLS 14) Rumanian. In Papers from the Seventeenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society (CLS 14), 88-97. Chicago: University of Chicago
16. Farkas, Donka and Klaus von Heusinger (2003). Stability of reference and Summerschool in Logic, Language and Information (ESSLLI) in Vienna) object marking in Romanian. Ms., Universität Stuttgart, (Paper given at the XV European Summerschool in Logic, Language and Information (ESSLLI) in Vienna)
17. Fodor, Janet Dean and Ivan A. Sag (1982). Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy 5: 355-398
18. Geist, Ljudmila (2008). Specificity as referential anchoring: evidence pronouns Humanities, to appear from Russian indefinite pronouns. In Proceedings of SuB 12. Digital Publications at the University of Oslo and the Faculty of Humanities, (to appear)
19. Haspelmath, Martin (1997). Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press
20. Heusinger, Klaus von (2002). Specificity and Definiteness in Sentence and Discourse Structure. Journal of Semantics 19: 245-274
21. - (2007). Referentially anchored indefinite NPs. In Existence: Syntax and Semantics, Ileana Comorovski and Klaus von Heusinger (eds.), 273-292. Dordrecht: Springer
22. - (this volume). Verbal semantics and the diachronic development of marking in Spanish differential object marking in Spanish, [ENTER PAGES]
23. Heusinger, Klaus von and Georg A. Kaiser (2005). The evolution of Nominal Determination Systems in Romance Universität Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft (Arbeitspapier 119) differential object marking in Spanish. In Proceedings of the Workshop "Specificity and the Evolution/Emergence of Nominal Determination Systems in Romance", Klaus von Heusinger, Georg A. Kaiser and Elisabeth Stark (eds.), 33-69. Universität Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft (Arbeitspapier 119)
24. - (2007). Differential object marking and verb classes in Spanish. In Ibero-Romance Languages Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft (Arbeitspapier 122) Proceedings of the Workshop "Definiteness, Specificity and Animacy in Ibero-Romance Languages.", Georg A. Kaiser and Manuel Leonetti (eds.), 83-109. Universität Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft (Arbeitspapier 122)
25. Heusinger, Klaus von and Jaklin Kornfilt (2005). The case of the direct Morphology object in Turkish: Semantics, Syntax and Morphology. Turkic Languages 9: 3-44
26. Higginbotham, James (1987). Indefinites and predication. In The Representation of (In)definiteness, Eric Reuland and G. B. Alice ter Meulen (eds.), 43-70. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
27. Hopper, Paul J. and Sandra A. Thompson (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56: 251-299
28. Kamp, Hans and Agnes Bende-Farkas (2006). Specific indefinites: Anchors and functional reading. Ms. Universität Stuttgart
29. Krifka, Manfred et al. (1995). Genericity: An introduction. In The Chicago Press Generic Book, Greg N. Carlson and Francis J. Pelletier (eds.), 1-124. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
30. Laca, Brenda (2002). Gramaticalización y variabilidad - factores contextuales en la evolución del acusativo preposicional en espannol diachronen Varietätenlinguistik des Spanischen und anderer romanischer Sprachen. Festschrift für Jens Lüdtke zum 60. propriedades inherentes y factores contextuales en la evolución del acusativo preposicional en espannol. In Sprachgeschichte als Varietätengeschichte: Beiträge zur diachronen Varietä tenlinguistik des Spanischen und anderer romanischer Sprachen. Festschrift für Jens Lüdtke zum 60. Geburtstag, Andreas Wesch (ed.), 195-303. Tübingen: Stauffenburg
31. - (2006). El objeto directo. La marcación preposicional. In Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Sintaxis historica del español. Primera parte: la frase verbal, Concepción Company (ed.), vol. 1: 423-475. Mexico: Fondo de cultura económica / Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
32. Leonetti, Manuel (2004). Specificity and differential object marking in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 3: 75-114
33. - (this volume). Specificity in clitic doubling and in differential object marking. Probus 20: 33-66
34. Lyons, Christopher (1999). Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
35. Mardale, Alexandru (2007). Bare plurals and differential object marking in Romanian and Spanish, Paper presented at the Workshop DOM in Romance, Universität Stuttgart
36. Melis, Chantal (1995). El objeto directo personal en El Cantar de Mio sintáctico-pragmático Cid. Estudio sintáctico- pragmático. In El complemento directo preposicional, Carmen Pensado (ed), 133-163. Madrid: Visor
37. Milsark, Gary (1974). Existential sentences in English. Ph.D. Diss., Cambridge, MA: MIT
38. Popescu, Alexandra (1997). Objektklitika und Argumentlinking im Rumänischen. Magisterarbeit. Universität Düsseldorf
39. Schäfer-Prieß, Barbara. (2002). O acusativo preposicional na Actas do Encontro Universidade do Minho história da língua portuguesa. In História da Língua e História da Gramática. Actas do Encontro, Brian Head, José Teixeira, Aida Sampaio Lemos et alii (eds.), 405-419. Braga: Universidade do Minho