Verbal semantics and the diachronic development of DOM in Spanish

Probus

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-31

  Von Heusinger, Klaus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61249377605     PISSN: 09214771     EISSN: 16134079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/PROBUS.2008.001     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (48)

1. Bible B: 16th/17th century: Reina Valera Antigua (1569/1602). (http://www.biblegateway.com)
2. Bible C: 20th century: Reina Valera (1995) (United Bible Societies). (http://www.biblegateway. com)
3. Bible D: 20th century: La Biblia de las Américas (1971) (The Lockman Foundation) Lockman Foundation). (http://www. biblegateway.com)
4. Holy Bible: The 21st Century King James Version of the Holy Bible updating of the 1611 King James Version (KJV) (KJ21®) is an updating of the 1611 King James Version (KJV) (http://www.biblegateway.com)
5. Corpus del Español from the 12th to the 19th century (http://www.corpusdelespanol.org)
6. Aissen, Judith (2003). Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435-483
7. Baily, Charles-James (1973). Variation and Linguistic Theory. Arlington, Va.: Center for Applied Linguistics
8. Bello, Andrés (1847). Gramática de la lengua castellana americanos destinada al uso de los americanos. Con las notas de Rufino José Cuervo. Vol. 2. Madrid: Arco Libros, estudio y edición de Ramón Trujillo 1988
9. Bolinger, Dwight L. (1953). Verbs of being. Hispania 36: 343-345
10. Bleam, Tonia (1999). Leísta Spanish and the syntax of clitic doubling, PhD. Dissertation, University of Delaware
11. Bossong, Georg (1985). Empirische Universalienforschung. Differentielle neuiranischen Sprachen Objektmarkierung in den neuiranischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Narr
12. Brugè, Laura and Gerhard Brugger (1996). On the acusative a in Spanish. Probus 8: 1-51
13. Butt, Miriam (2006). The dative-ergative connection. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 6, Olivier Bonami and Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), 69-92. (http:/www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss6)
14. Comrie, Bernard (1975). Definite and animate direct objects: a natural class. Linguistica Silesiona 3: 13-21
15. Croft, William (1988). Agreement vs. case marking and direct objects. In Study of Language and Information Agreement in Natural Language. Approaches, Theories, Descriptions, Michael Barlow and Charles A. Ferguson (eds.), 159-179. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information
16. - (2003). Typology and Universals (2nd. ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
17. Cysouw, Michael and Bernhard Wälchli (2007). Parallel texts: using translational equivalents in linguistic typology. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 60: 95-99
18. Enrique-Arias, Andrés (2007). Biblias romanceadas e historia de la lengua. To appear in: Actas del congreso de Historia de la Lengua de Mérida
19. Escandell-Vidal V Topics from Ibiza: differential object marking and Ibero-Romance Languages Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft (Arbeitspapier 122) Georg A. Kaiser and Manuel Leonetti (eds.) Universität Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft (Arbeitspapier 122) clitic-dislocation, Proceedings of the Workshop "Definiteness, Specificity and Animacy in Ibero-Romance Languages", 2007 Georg A. Kaiser and Manuel Leonetti (eds.) . Universität Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft (Arbeitspapier 122) Georg A. Kaiser and Manuel Leonetti (eds.) Universität Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft (Arbeitspapier 122) 23-43
20. Fernández Ramírez, Salvador (1951). Gramática Madrid: Arco/Libros, segunda edición española. Vol. 4: El verbo y la oración (volumen ordenado y completado por Ignacio Bosque). Madrid: Arco/Libros, segunda edición 1986
21. Fish, Gordon A. (1967). 'A' with Spanish direct object. Hispania 50: 80-85
22. Fontana, Josep M. (1993). Phrase structure and the syntax of clitics in the history of Spanish. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania
23. García García, Marco (2007) Differential object marking Ibero-Romance Languages Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft (Arbeitspapier 122) with inanimate objects. In Proceedings of the Workshop "Definiteness, Specificity and Animacy in Ibero-Romance Languages", Georg A. Kaiser and Manuel Leonetti (eds.), 63-84. Universität Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft (Arbeitspapier 122)
24. Guntsetseg, Dolgor (2007). Differential object marking in Mongolian. Ms. Universität Stuttgart
25. von Heusinger, Klaus and Georg A. Kaiser (2005). The evolution of Nominal Determination in Romance, Klaus von Heusinger Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft (Arbeitspapier 119) differential object marking in Spanish. In Proceedings of the Workshop "Specificity and the Evolution/Emergence of Nominal Determination in Romance", Klaus von Heusinger, Georg A. Kaiser and Elisabeth Stark (eds.), 33-69. Universität Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft (Arbeitspapier 119)
26. - (2007). Differential Object Marking and the Lexical Semantics of Verbs Ibero-Romance Languages Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft (Arbeitspapier 122). in Spanish. In Proceedings of the Workshop "Definiteness, Specificity and Animacy in Ibero-Romance Languages", Georg A. Kaiser and Manuel Leonetti (eds.), 83-109. Universität Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft (Arbeitspapier 122)
27. von Heusinger, Klaus and Udo Klein (2007). Differential Object Marking and the Strength of Case Relation. Ms Universität Stuttgart
28. von Heusinger, Klaus and Edgar Onea (this volume). Triggering and in Romanian blocking effects in the diachronic development of DOM in Romanian. Probus 20: 67-110
29. Hoop, Helen de and Bhuvana Narasimhan (2005). Differential case-marking Amsterdam, Oxford: Elsevier in Hindi. In Competition and Variation in Natural languages the Case for Case, Mengistu Amberber and Helen de Hoop (eds.), 321-345. Amsterdam, Oxford: Elsevier
30. Hopper, Paul and Sandra Thompson (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56: 251-299
31. Isenberg, Horst (1968). Das direkte Objekt im Spanischen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag
32. Kaiser, Georg A. (2005). Bibelübersetzungen als Grundlage für Sprachwandeluntersuchungen und diachrone Sprachwissenschaft. Corpora and Diachronic Linguistics Narr empirische Sprachwandeluntersuchungen. In Romanistische Korpuslinguistik II. Romance Corpus Linguistics II. Korpora und diachrone Sprachwissenschaft. Corpora and Diachronic Linguistics, Claus D. Pusch, Johannes Kabatek and Wolfgang Raible (eds.), 71-85. Tübingen: Narr
33. Kroch, Anthony S. (1989). Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1: 199-244
34. Laca, Brenda (2002). Gramaticalización y variabilidad - factores contextuales en la evolución del acusativo preposicional en español diachronen Varietätenlinguistik des Spanischen und anderer romanischer Sprachen. Festschrift für Jens Lüdtke zum 60. propriedades inherentes y factores contextuales en la evolución del acusativo preposicional en español. In Sprachgeschichte als Varietätengeschichte: Beiträge zur diachronen Varietä tenlinguistik des Spanischen und anderer romanischer Sprachen. Festschrift für Jens Lüdtke zum 60. Geburtstag, Andreas Wesch (ed.), 195-303. Tübingen: Stauffenburg
35. - (2006). El objeto directo. La marcación preposicional. In económica/Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Sintaxis historica del español. Primera parte: La frase verbal, Concepción Company (dir.), vol. 1: 423-475. Mexico: Fondo de cultura económica/ Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
36. Leonetti, Manuel (2004). Specificity and differential object marking in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 3: 75-114
37. Melis, Chantal (1995). El objeto directo personal en El Cantar de Mio sintácticopragmático Cid. Estudio sintácticopragmá tico. In El complemento directo preposicional, Carmen Pensado (ed.), 133-163. Madrid: Visor
38. Moravcsik, Edit (1978). On the case marking of objects. In Universals of Human Language IV, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 249-290. Stanford: Stanford University Press
39. Naess, Ashild (2004). What markedness marks. The markedness problem with direct objects. Lingua 114: 1186-1212
40. - (2007). Prototypical Transitivity. Amsterdam: Benjamins
41. Parodi, Teresa (1998). Aspects of clitic doubling and clitic clusters in Spanish. In Models of Inflection, R. Fabri, O. Albert and Teresa Parodi (eds.), 85-102. Tübingen: Niemeyer
42. Pensado, Carmen (1995). El complemento directo preposicional. Estado de bibliografía comentada la cuestión y bibliografía comentada. In El complemento directo preposicional, Carmen Pensado (ed.), 11-60. Madrid: Visor
43. Pintzuk, Susan (2003). Variationist approaches to syntactic change. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda (eds.), 509-528. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing
44. Pottier, Bernard (1968). L'emploi de la préposition a devant l'objet en espagnol. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique 1: 83-95
45. Roegiest, Eugeen (1979). A propos de l'accusatif prépositionnel romanes. dans quelques langues romanes. Vox Romanica 38: 37-54
46. Silverstein, Michael (1976). Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Studies Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Robert M. W. Dixon (ed.), 112-171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies
47. Suñer, Margarita (1988). The Role of Agreement in clitic-doubled constructions. Natural Languages and Linguistic Theory 6: 391-434
48. Torrego, Esther (1999). El complemento directo preposicional. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte (eds.), vol. 2: 1779-1805. Madrid: Espasa Calpe