Evaluation of the Neural Response Telemetry (NRT) capabilities of the Nucleus Research Platform 8: Initial results from the NRT trial

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 43, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2004, Pages

  Battmer, Rolf D ^a,g   Dillier, Norbert ^b   Lai, Wai K ^b   Weber, Benno P ^b   Brown, Carolyn ^c   Gantz, Bruce J ^c   Roland, J Thomas ^c   Cohen, Noel J ^d   Shapiro, William ^d   Pesch, Joerg ^e   Killian, Matthijs J ^f   Lenarz, Thomas ^a  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

^d NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e Cochlear GmbH Hannover ^*  (Germany)

^f Research and Development   (Belgium)

^g Department of Otolaryngology ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Amplitude growth function; Artefact cancellation; ECAP; NRT; Recovery function

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NERVE FIBER; ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT; NERVE POTENTIAL; NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH; TELEMETRY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COCHLEAR NERVE; ELECTRODES; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HEARING TESTS; HUMANS; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; TELEMETRY;

EID: 19944431982     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Abbas, P.J., Brown, C.J., Shallop, J.K., Firszt, J.B., Hughes, M.L., et al. 1999. Summary of results using the nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear Hear, 20(1), 45-59.
2. Brown, C.J., Abbas, P.J. & Gantz, B.J. 1998. Preliminary experience with neural response telemetry in the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant. Am J Otol, 19(3), 320-327.
3. Brown, C.J., Hughes, M.L., Luk, B., Abbas, P.J., Wolaver, A., et al. 2000. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults. Ear Hear, 21(2), 151-163.
4. Dillier, N., Lai, W.K., Almqvist, B., Frohne, C., Müller-Deile, J., et al. 2002. Measurement of the electrically evoked compound action potential via a neural response telemetry system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 5, 407-414.
5. Gordon, K.A., Ebinger, K.A., Gilden, J.E. & Shapiro, W.H. 2002. Neural response telemetry in 12- to 24-month-old children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, 189, 42-48.
6. Hughes, M.L., Brown, C.J., Abbas, P.J., Wolaver, A.A. & Gervais, J.P. 2000. Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: data from children. Ear Hear, 21, 164-174.
7. Kiss, J.G., Toth, F., Nagy, A.L., Jarabin, J., Szamoskozi, A., et al. 2003. Neural response telemetry in cochlear implant users. Int Tinnitus J, 9(1), 59-60.
8. Lai, W.K. 1999. An NRT Cookbook - Guidelines for Making NRT™ Measurements version 2.04. Basel: Cochlear AG.
9. Lai, W.K. & Dillier, N. 2000. A simple two-component model of the electrically evoked compound action potential in the human cochlea. Audiol Neurootol, 5(6), 333-345.
10. Mason, S.M., Cope, Y., Garnham, J., O'Donoghue, G.M. & Gibbin, K.P. 2001. Intra-operative recordings of electrically evoked auditory nerve action potentials in young children by use of neural response telemetry with the Nucleus C24M cochlear implant. Br J Audiol, 35(4), 225-235.
11. Miller, C.A., Abbas, P.J. & Brown, C.J. 2000. An improved method of reducing stimulus artifact in the electrically evoked whole-nerve potential. Ear Hear, 21, 280-290.
12. Müller-Deile, J., Morsnowski, A., Charasse, B., Thai-Van, H., Killian, M., et al. 2003. Correlation of auditory nerve recovery function and offset between auditory nerve response threshold and psychophysical threshold in nucleus cochlear implant recipients. Presented at the 4th Symposium on Electronic Implants in Otology and Conventional Hearing Aids, Toulouse, June 2003.
13. Seyle, K. & Brown, C.J. 2002. Speech perception using maps based on neural response telemetry measures. Ear Hear, 23(1 Suppl), 72S-79S.
14. Shpak, T., Berlin, M. & Luntz, M. 2003. Objective measurement of auditory nerve recovery function in Nucleus CI24 implantees in relation to subjective preference of stimulation rate. Presented at the 4th Symposium on Electronic Implants in Otology and Conventional Hearing Aids, Toulouse, June 2003.
15. Smoorenburg, G., Willeboer, C. & van Dijk, J.E. 2002. Speech perception in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users with processor setting based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds. Audiol Neurootol, 7, 335-347.
16. Thai-Van, H., Chanal, J.M., Coudert, C., Veuillet, E., Truy, E., et al. 2001. Relationship between NRT measurements and behavioral levels in children with the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant may change over time: preliminary report. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 58(2), 153-162.