In vitro fracture resistance of glass-fiber and cast metal posts with different lengths

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 101, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 183-188

  Giovani, Alessandro Rogério ^a   Vansan, Luiz Pascoal ^a   de Sousa Neto, Manoel Damião ^b   Paulino, Silvana Maria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RIBEIRÃO PRETO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; GLASS; GLASS FIBER; RESIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; INJURY; INSTRUMENTATION; MAXILLA; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH PULP DISEASE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CUSPID; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; GLASS; HUMANS; MAXILLA; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH, NONVITAL;

EID: 60749088930     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60025-1     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Schwartz R.S., and Robbins J.W. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod 30 (2004) 289-301
2. Steele G.D. Reinforced composite resin foundations for endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 30 (1973) 816-819
3. Iglesia-Puig M.A., and Arellano-Cabornero A. Fiber-reinforced post and core adapted to a previous metal ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 91 (2004) 191-194
4. Ng C.C., Dumbrigue H.B., Al-Bayat M.I., Griggs J.A., and Wakefield C.W. Influence of remaining coronal tooth structure location on the fracture resistance of restored endodontically treated anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 95 (2006) 290-296
5. Wu M.K., Pehlivan Y., Kontakiotis E.G., and Wesselink P.R. Microleakage along apical root fillings and cemented posts. J Prosthet Dent 79 (1998) 264-269
6. Yang H.S., Lang L.A., Molina A., and Felton D.A. The effects of dowel design and load direction on dowel-and-core restorations. J Prosthet Dent 85 (2001) 558-567
7. Hayashi M., Takahashi Y., Imazato S., and Ebisu S. Fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with post-cores and crowns. Dent Mater 22 (2006) 477-485
8. Plasmans P.J., Welle P.R., and Vrijhoef M.M. In vitro resistance of composite resin dowel and cores. J Endod 14 (1988) 300-304
9. Freedman G.A. Esthetic post-and-core treatment. Dent Clin North Am 45 (2001) 103-116
10. Qing H., Zhu Z., Chao Y., and Zhang W. In vitro evaluation of the fracture resistance of anterior endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber and zircon posts. J Prosthet Dent 97 (2007) 93-98
11. Martínez-Insua A., da Silva L., Rilo B., and Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent 80 (1998) 527-532
12. Newman M.P., Yaman P., Dennison J., Rafter M., and Billy E. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. J Prosthet Dent 89 (2003) 360-367
13. Saupe W.A., Gluskin A.H., and Radke Jr. R.A. A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin-reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots. Quintessence Int 27 (1996) 483-491
14. Möllersten L., Lockowandt P., and Lindén L.A. A comparison of strengths of five core and post-and-core systems. Quintessence Int 33 (2002) 140-149
15. Teixeira E., Teixeira F.B., Piasick J.R., and Thompson J.Y. An in vitro assessment of prefabricated fiber post systems. J Am Dent Assoc 137 (2006) 1006-1012
16. Seefeld F., Wenz H.J., Ludwig K., and Kern M. Resistance to fracture and structural characteristics of different fiber reinforced post systems. Dent Mater 23 (2007) 265-271
17. Fokkinga W.A., Kreulen C.M., Le Bell-Rönnlöf A.M., Lassila L.V., Vallittu P.K., and Creugers N.H. In vitro fracture behavior of maxillary premolars with metal crowns and several post-and-core systems. Eur J Oral Sci 114 (2006) 250-256
18. Standlee J.P., Caputo A.A., Collard E.W., and Pollack M.H. Analysis of stress distribution by endodontic posts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 33 (1972) 952-960
19. Grieznis L., Apse P., and Soboleva U. The effect of 2 different diameter cast posts on tooth root fracture resistance in vitro. Stomatologija 8 (2006) 30-32
20. Shillingburg Jr. H.T., Fisher D.W., and Dewhirst R.B. Restoration of endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 24 (1970) 401-409
21. Goerig A.C., and Mueninghoff L.A. Management of the endodontically treated tooth. Part I: concept for restorative designs. J Prosthet Dent 49 (1983) 340-345
22. Sokol D.J. Effective use of current core and post concepts. J Prosthet Dent 52 (1984) 231-234
23. Braga N.M., Paulino S.M., Alfredo E., Sousa-Neto M.D., and Vansan L.P. Removal resistance of glass-fiber and metallic cast posts with different lengths. J Oral Science 48 (2006) 15-20
24. Stockton L.W. Factors affecting retention of post systems: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 81 (1999) 380-385
25. De Deus Q.D. Frequency, location, and direction of the lateral, secondary, and accessory canals. J Endod 1 (1975) 361-366
26. Tagger M., Tamse A., Katz A., and Korzen B.H. Evaluation of the apical seal produced by a hybrid root canal filling method, combining lateral condensation and thermatic compaction. J Endod 10 (1984) 299-303