Updating sensory versus task representations during task-switching: Insights from cognitive brain potentials in humans

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 1160-1172

  Periáñez, José A ^a   Barceló, Francisco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT DE LES ILLES BALEARS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Novelty P3; P300; Perceptual priming; Repetition suppression; Set shifting

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COGNITION; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; CUES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 60549083649     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.014     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Allport A., and Wylie G. Task-switching, stimulus-response bindings and negative priming. In: Monsell S., and Driver J. (Eds). Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 35-70
2. Altmann E.M. Advance preparation in task switching: What work is being done?. Psychological Science 15 9 (2004) 616-622
3. Baldi P. Surprise: A shortcut for attention. In: Itti L., Rees G., and Tsotsos J.K. (Eds). Neurobiology of attention (2005), Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego 24-28
4. Barceló F. The Madrid card sorting test (MCST): A task switching paradigm to study executive attention with event-related potentials. Brain Research Protocols 11 1 (2003) 27-37
5. Barceló F., Escera C., Corral M.J., and Perianez J.A. Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 10 (2006) 1734-1748
6. Barceló F., and Knight R.T. An information theoretical approach to contextual processing in the human brain: Evidence from prefrontal lesions. Cerebral Cortex 17 (2007) i51-i60
7. Barceló F., Muñoz-Céspedes J.M., Pozo M.A., and Rubia F.J. Attentional set shifting modulates the target P3b response in the Wisconsin Card Sorting test. Neuropsychologia 38 10 (2000) 1342-1355
8. Barceló F., Perianez J.A., and Nyhus E. An information theoretical approach to task-switching: Evidence from cognitive brain potentials in humans. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 1 1 (2008) 13 10.3389/neuro.3309/3013
9. Barceló F., Periañez J.A., and Knight R.T. Think differently: A brain orienting response to task novelty. NeuroReport 13 15 (2002) 1887-1892
10. Brass M., Ullsperger M., Knoesche T.R., von Cramon D.Y., and Phillips N.A. Who comes first? The role of the prefrontal and parietal cortex in cognitive control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17 9 (2005) 1367-1375
11. Crowley K.E., and Colrain I.M. A review of the evidence for P2 being an independent component process: Age, sleep and modality. Clinical Neurophysiology 115 4 (2004) 732-744
12. Donchin E. Surprise! Surprise?. Psychophysiology 18 (1981) 493-513
13. Duncan-Johnson C.C., and Donchin E. On quantifying surprise: The variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology 14 5 (1977) 456-467
14. Escera C., Alho K., Winkler I., and Naatanen R. Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10 5 (1998) 590-604
15. Forstmann B.U., Brass M., and Koch I. Methodological and empirical issues when dissociating cue-related from task-related processes in the explicit task-cuing procedure. Psychological Research 71 4 (2007) 393-400
16. Friedman D., Cycowicz Y.M., and Gaeta H. The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 25 4 (2001) 355-373
17. Friston K. A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B. Biological Sciences 360 1456 (2005) 815-836
18. Fuster J.M. Physiology of executive functions: The perception-action cycle. In: Stuss D.T., and Knight R.T. (Eds). Principles of frontal lobe function. (2002), Oxford University Press, New York 96-108
19. Garcia-Larrea L., Lukaszewicz A.C., and Mauguiere F. Revisiting the oddball paradigm. Non-target vs neutral stimuli and the evaluation of ERP attentional effects. Neuropsychologia 30 8 (1992) 723-741
20. Gratton G., Coles M.G., and Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 55 4 (1983) 468-484
21. Grill-Spector K., Henson R., and Martin A. Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 1 (2006) 14-23
22. Hsieh S., and Cheng P. Task reconfiguration and carryover in task switching: An event-related potential study. Brain Research 1084 1 (2006) 132-145
23. Jost K., Mayr U., and Rosler F. Is task switching nothing but cue priming? Evidence from ERPs. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 8 1 (2008) 74-84
24. Kieffaber P.D., and Hetrick W.P. Event-related potential correlates of task switching and switch costs. Psychophysiology 42 1 (2005) 56-71
25. Kleinsorge T., Heuer H., and Schmidtke V. Assembling a task space: Global determination of local shift costs. Psychological Research 68 1 (2004) 31-40
26. Koechlin E., and Summerfield C. An information theoretical approach to prefrontal executive function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 6 (2007) 229-235
27. Kopp B., Tabeling S., Moschner C., and Wessel K. Fractionating the neural mechanisms of cognitive control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 6 (2006) 949-965
28. Lien M.C., and Ruthruff E. Task switching in a hierarchical task structure: Evidence for the fragility of the task repetition benefit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 30 3 (2004) 697-713
29. Logan G.D., and Bundesen C. Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29 3 (2003) 575-599
30. Mars R.B., Debener S., Gladwin T.E., Harrison L.E., Haggard P., Rothwell J.C., et al. Trial-by-trial fluctuations in the event-related encephalogram reflect dynamic changes in the degree of surprise. Journal of Neuroscience 28 47 (2008) 12539-12545
31. Mayr U., and Keele S.W. Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129 1 (2000) 4-26
32. Mayr U., and Kliegl R. Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 29 3 (2003) 362-372
33. Meiran N. Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 22 6 (1996) 1423-1442
34. Meiran N., and Chorev Z. Phasic alertness and the residual task-switching cost. Experimental Psychology 52 2 (2005) 109-124
35. Meiran N., Chorev Z., and Sapir A. Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology 41 3 (2000) 211-253
36. Miniussi C., Marzi C.A., and Nobre A.C. Modulation of brain activity by selective task sets observed using event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia 43 10 (2005) 1514-1528
37. Monsell S. Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 3 (2003) 134-140
38. Monsell S. The chronometrics of task-set control. In: Duncan J., Phillips L., and McLeod P. (Eds). Measuring the mind: Speed, control and age (2005), Oxford University Press, New York 161-190
39. Näätänen R., and Rinne T. Electric brain response to sound repetition in humans: An index of long-term-memory-trace formation?. Neuroscience Letter 318 1 (2002) 49-51
40. Nicholson R., Karayanidis F., Bumak E., Poboka D., and Michie P.T. ERPs dissociate the effects of switching task sets and task cues. Brain Research 1095 1 (2006) 107-123
41. Nicholson R., Karayanidis F., Poboka D., Heathcote A., and Michie P.T. Electrophysiological correlates of anticipatory task-switching processes. Psychophysiology 42 5 (2005) 540-554
42. Nobre A., Correa A., and Coull J. The hazards of time. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 17 4 (2007) 465-470
43. Philipp A.M., Jolicoeur P., Falkenstein M., and Koch I. Response selection and response execution in task switching: Evidence from a go-signal paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33 6 (2007) 1062-1075
44. Remington R.J. Analysis of sequential effects in choice reaction times. Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 2 (1969) 250-257
45. Rogers R.D., and Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124 (1995) 207-231
46. Rubinstein J.S., Meyer D.E., and Evans J.E. Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 4 (2001) 763-797
47. Rushworth M.F., Passingham R.E., and Nobre A.C. Components of switching intentional set. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14 8 (2002) 1139-1150
48. Schneider D.W., and Logan G.D. Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: Switching tasks in sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135 4 (2006) 623-640
49. Schneider D.W., and Logan G.D. Task switching versus cue switching: Using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33 2 (2007) 370-378
50. Shallice T., Stuss D.T., Picton T.W., Alexander M.P., and Gillingham S. Mapping task switching in frontal cortex through neuropsychological group studies. Frontiers in Neuroscience 2 1 (2008) 79-85
51. Squires K.C., Wickens C., Squires N.K., and Donchin E. The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event-related potential. Science 193 4258 (1976) 1142-1146
52. Swainson R., Jackson S.R., and Jackson G.M. Using advance information in dynamic cognitive control: An ERP study of task-switching. Brain Research 1105 1 (2006) 61-72