Attentional set shifting modulates the target P3b response in the Wisconsin card sorting test

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 38, Issue 10, 2000, Pages 1342-1355

  Barceló, Francisco ^a   Muñoz Céspedes, Juan M ^a   Pozo, Miguel A ^b   Rubia, Francisco J ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b INSTITUTO PLURIDISCIPLINAR   (Spain)

Author keywords

Attention; Evoked potentials; Prefrontal cortex; Wisconsin card sorting test; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; SENSORY STIMULATION; WORKING MEMORY;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; SET (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 0343517740     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00046-4     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Allport A., Styles E.A., Hsieh S. Shifting intentional set: exploring the dynamic control of tasks. Umiltà C., Moscovitch M. Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing. 1994;421-452 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. American Electroencephalographic Society Guidelines for clinical electroencephalography. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 1994;11:111-3.
3. Anderson S.W., Damasio H., Jones R.D., Tranel D. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance as a measure of frontal lobe damage. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 13:1991;909-922.
4. Barceló F. Electrophysiological evidence of two different types of error in the Wisconsin card sorting test. NeuroReport. 10:1999;1299-1303.
5. Barceló F, Knight RT. Both random and perseverative errors underlie WCST deficits in prefrontal patients. Submitted.
6. Barceló F., Knight R.T. Role of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in attentional set shifting: parsing the cognitive significance of WCST errors with event-related potentials. Psychophysiology. 36:1999;S30.
7. Barceló F., Rubia F.J. Non-frontal P3b-like activity evoked by the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. NeuroReport. 9:1998;747-751.
8. Barceló F., Sanz M., Molina V., Rubia F.J. The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and the assessment of frontal function: A validation study with event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia. 35:1997;399-408.
9. Barceló F., Suwazono S., Knight R.T. Prefrontal modulation of visual processing in humans. Nature Neuroscience. 3:2000;399-403.
10. Berman K.F., Ostrem J.L., Randolph C., Gold J., Goldberg T.E., Coppola R., et al. Physiological activation of a cortical network during performance of the Wisconsin card sorting test: a positron emission tomography study. Neuropsychologia. 33:1995;1027-1046.
11. Brown R.G., Marsden C.D. Internal vs external cues and the control of attention in Parkinson's disease. Brain. 111:1988;323-345.
12. Bundesen C. A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review. 97:1990;523-547.
13. Corcoran R., Upton D. A role for the hippocampus in card sorting? Cortex. 29:1993;293-304.
14. Dehaene S., Changeux J.P. The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: theoretical analysis and modeling in a neuronal network. Cerebral Cortex. 1:1991;62-79.
15. Dehaene S., Changeux J.P. Neuronal models of prefrontal cortical functions. Annals of the New York Academy of Science. 769:1995;305-319.
16. Desimone R., Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 18:1995;193-222.
17. Dias R., Robbins T.W., Roberts A.C. Dissociation in prefrontal cortex of affective and attentional shifts. Nature. 380:1996;69-72.
18. Dias R., Robbins T.W., Roberts A.C. Dissociable forms of inhibitory control within prefrontal cortex with an analog of the Wisconsin card sort test: restriction to novel situations and independence from on-line processing. The Journal of Neuroscience. 17:1997;9285-9297.
19. Donchin E., Coles M.G.H. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 11:1988;343-356.
20. Donchin E., Coles M.H.G. Context updating and the P300. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 21:1998;152-153.
21. Duncan J.G.H., Ward R. Competitive brain activity in visual attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 7:1997;255-261.
22. Eichenbaum H., Otto T., Cohen N.J. Two functional components of the hippocampal memory system. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 17:1994;449-518.
23. Ford J.M. Schizophrenia: the broken P300 and beyond. Psychophysiology. 36:1999;667-682.
24. Fuster J.M. The prefrontal cortex. Anatomy, physiology, and neuropsychology of the frontal lobes. 1997;Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia.
25. Gauntlett-Gilbert J., Roberts R.C., Brown V.J. Mechanisms underlying attentional set-shifting in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia. 37:1999;605-616.
26. Giovagnoli A.R., Avanzini G. Forgetting rate and interference effects on a verbal memory distractor task in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 13:1996;909-922.
27. Halgren E., Baudena P., Clarke J.M., Heit G., Liégeois C., Chauvel P., Musolino A. Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli: I. Superior temporal plane and parietal lobe. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 94:1995;191-220.
28. Halgren E., Baudena P., Clarke J.M., Heit G., Marinkovic K., Devaux B., et al. Intracerebral potentials to rate target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli: II. Medial lateral and posterior temporal lobe. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 94:1995;229-250.
29. Hayes A.E., Davidson M.C., Keele S.W., Rafal R.D. Toward a functional analysis of the basal ganglia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 10:1998;178-198.
30. Heit G., Smith M.E., Halgren E. Neuronal activity in the human medial temporal lobe during recognition memory. Brain. 113:1990;1093-1112.
31. Keele SW, Rafal R. Deficits of attentional set in frontal patients. In: Monsell S, Driver J, editors. Control of cognitive operations: Attention and performance XVIII. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, in press.
32. Kimberg D.Y., D'Esposito M., Farah M.J. Frontal lobes: neuropsychological aspects. Feinberg T.E., Farah M.J. Behavioral neurology and neuropsychology. 1997;409-418 McGraw Hill, New York.
33. Knight R.T. A distributed cortical network for visual attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 9:1997;75-91.
34. Knight R.T., Grabowecky M.F., Scabini D. Role of human prefrontal cortex in attention control. Jasper H.H., Goldman-Rakic R.S., Goldman-Rakic P.S. Epilepsy and the functional anatomy of the frontal lobe. 1995;21-36 Raven Press, New York.
35. Knight R.T., Scabini D. Anatomic bases of event-related potentials and their relationship to novelty detection in humans. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 15:1998;3-13.
36. Konishi S., Kawazu M., Uchida I., Kikyo H., Asakura I., Miyashita Y. Contribution of working memory to transient activation in human inferior prefrontal cortex during performance of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Cerebral Cortex. 9:1999;745-753.
37. Konishi S., Nakajima K., Uchida I., Kameyama M., Nakahara K., Sekihara K., Miyashita Y. Transient activation of inferior prefrontal cortex during cognitive set shifting. Nature Neuroscience. 1:1998;80-84.
38. Lezak M.D. Neuropsychological assessment. 1995;Oxford University Press, New York.
39. Mattes R., Cohen R., Berg P., Canavan A.G.M., Hopmann G. Slow potentials (SCPS) in schizophrenic patients during performance of the Wisconsin Card-sorting Test (WCST). Neuropsychologia. 29:1991;195-205.
40. Milner B. Effects of different brain lesions on card sorting. Archives of Neurology. 9:1963;100-110.
41. Mountain M.A., Snow W.G. Wisconsin card sorting test as a measure of frontal pathology: A review. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 7:1993;108-118.
42. Nagahama Y., Fukuyama H., Yamauchi H., Matsuzaki S., Konishi J., Shibasaki H., Kimura J. Cerebral activation during performance of a card sorting test. Brain. 119:1996;1667-1675.
43. O'Donnell B.F., McCarley R.W., Potts G.F., Salisbury D.F., Nestor P.G., Hirayasu Y., et al. Identification of neural circuits underlying P300 abnormalities in schizophrenia. Psychophysiology. 36:1999;399-408.
44. Owen A.M., Roberts A.C., Hodges J.R., Summers B.A., Polkey C.E., Robbins T.W. Contrasting mechanisms of impaired attentional set-shifting in patients with frontal lobe damage or Parkinson's disease. Brain. 116:1993;1159-1175.
45. Pantelis C., Barber F.Z., Barnes T.R., Nelson H.E., Owen A.M., Robbins T.W. Comparison of set-shifting ability in patients with chronic schizophrenia and frontal lobe damage. Schizophrenia Research. 37:1999;251-270.
46. Partiot A., Verin M., Pillon B., Teixeira C Ferreira, Agid Y., Dubois B. Delayed response tasks in basal ganglia lesions in man: Further evidence for a striato-frontal cooperation in behavioural adaptation. Neuropsychologia. 34:1996;709-721.
47. Posner M.I., Dehaene S. Attentional networks. Trends in Neurosciences. 17:1994;75-79.
48. Robbins T.W. Dissociating executive functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences. 351:1996;1463-1470.
49. Robbins T.W. Arousal and attention: Psychopharmacological and neuropsychological studies in experimental animals. Parasuraman R. The attentive brain. 1998;189-220 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
50. Roberts A.C., Robbins T.W., Everitt B.J. The effects of intradimensional and extradimensional shifts on visual discrimination learning in humans and non-human primates. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 40B:1988;321-341.
51. Rogers R.D., Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 124:1995;207-231.
52. Rogers R.D., Sahakian B.J., Hodges J.R., Polkey C.E., Kennard C., Robbins T.W. Dissociating executive mechanisms of task control following frontal lobe damage and parkinson's disease. Brain. 121:1998;815-842.
53. Semlitsch H.V., Anderer P., Schuster P., Preslich O. A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology. 23:1986;695-703.
54. Shallice T. Multiple levels of control processes. Umiltà C., Moscovitch M. Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing. 1994;395-420 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
55. Sommer W., Leuthold H., Matt J. The expectancies that govern the P300 amplitude are mostly automatic and unconscious. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 21:1998;149-150.
56. Stuss D.T., Benson D.F. The frontal lobes. 1986;Raven Press, New York.
57. Verleger R. Event-related potentials and cognition: A critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 11:1988;343-356.
58. Verleger R. On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology. 34:1997;131-156.
59. Verleger R. Toward an integration of P3 research with cognitive neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 21:1998;150-152.
60. Verleger R., Heide W., Butt C., Kömpf D. Reduction of P3b in patients with temporo-parietal lesions. Cognitive Brain Research. 2:1994;103-116.