Task reconfiguration and carryover in task switching: An event-related potential study

Brain Research

Volumn 1084, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 132-145

  Hsieh, Shulan ^a   Cheng, Poyu ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHUNG CHENG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Anticipatory; Carryover; ERP; P3b; Preparatory, CNV like negativity; Reconfiguration; Switch cost; Task switching

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTICIPATION; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MENTAL TASK; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33646522696     PISSN: 00068993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.060     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Allport A., and Wylie G. Task switching, stimulus-response bindings, and negative priming. In: Monsell S., and Driver J. (Eds). Atten. Perform. vol. XVIII (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 35-70
2. Allport A., Styles E.A., and Hsieh S. Shifting intentional set: exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In: Umiltà C., and Moscovitch M. (Eds). Atten. Perform. vol. XV (1994), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 421-452
3. Barceló F., Periáñez J.A., and Knight R.T. Think differently: a brain orienting response to task novelty. NeuroReport 13 (2002) 1887-1892
4. Brunia C.H.M., and van Boxtel G.J.M. Wait and see. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 43 (2001) 59-75
5. Donchin E., and Coles M.G.H. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating. Behav. Brain Sci. 11 (1988) 357-374
6. Dove A., Pollmann S., Schubert T., Wiggins C.J., and von Cramon D.Y. Prefrontal cortex activation in task switching: an event-related fMRI study. Cogn. Brain Res. 9 (2000) 103-109
7. Goschke T. Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task set switching. In: Monsell S., and Driver J. (Eds). Atten. Perform. vol. XVIII (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 331-355
8. Hsieh S. Two component processes in switching attention: a study of event-related potentials. Percept. Mot. Skills 94 (2002) 1168-1176
9. Hsieh, S., in press. The lateralized readiness potential and P300 of stimulus-set switching, Int. J. Psychophysiol.
10. Hsieh S., and Liu L.C. The nature of switch cost: task set configuration or carry-over effect?. Cogn. Brain Res. 22 (2005) 165-175
11. Hsieh S., and Yu Y.T. Switching between simple response-sets: inferences from the lateralized readiness potentials. Cogn. Brain Res. 17 (2003) 228-237
12. Karayanidis F., Coltheart M., Michie P.T., and Murphy K. Electrophysiological correlates of anticipatory, and poststimulus components of task switching. Psychophysiology 40 (2003) 329-348
13. Kieffaber P.D., and Hetrick W.P. Event-related potential correlates of task switching and switch costs. Psychophysiology 42 (2005) 56-71
14. Kimberg D.Y., Aguirre G.K., and D'Esposito M. Modulation of task-related neural activity in task-switching: an fMRI study. Cogn. Brain Res. 10 (2000) 189-196
15. Koch I. Sequential task predictability in task switching. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 12 (2005) 107-112
16. Kok A. On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology 38 (2001) 557-577
17. Lorist M., Klein M., Nieuwenhuis S., de Jong R., Mulder G., and Meijman T.F. Mental fatigue and task control: planning and preparation. Psychophysiology 37 (2000) 614-625
18. McCarthy G., and Wood C.C. Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 62 (1985) 203-208
19. Meiran N. Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 22 (1996) 1-20
20. Meiran N., Chorev Z., and Sapir A. Component processes in task switching. Cogn. Psychol. 41 (2000) 211-253
21. Monsell, S., 1996. Control of mental processes. In: Bruce, V. (Ed.), Unsolved Mysteries of the Mind: Tutorial Essays in Cognition. Erlbaum, Taylor & Francis, Hove, England, pp. 93-148.
22. Nicholson, R., Karayanidis, F., Poboka, D., Heathcote, A., Michie, P., in press. Electrophysiological correlates of anticipatory task-switching processes, Psychophysiology 42.
23. Poulsen C., Luu P., Davey C., and Tucker D.M. Dynamics of task sets: evidence from dense-array event-related potentials. Cogn. Brain Res. 24 (2005) 133-154
24. Rogers R.D., and Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 124 (1995) 207-231
25. Rubinstein J.S., Meyer D.E., and Evans J.E. Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27 (2001) 763-797
26. Rushworth M.F.S., Passignham R.E., and Nobre A.C. Components of switching intentional set. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 14 (2002) 1139-1150
27. Ruthruff E., Remington R.W., and Johnston J.C. Switching between simple cognitive tasks: the interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27 (2001) 1404-1419
28. Sohn M.H., and Anderson J.R. Task preparation and task repetition: two-component model of task switching. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 130 (2001) 764-778
29. Sohn M.H., and Carlson R.A. Effects of repetition and foreknowledge in task-set reconfiguration. J. Exp. Psychol., Learn. Mem. Cogn. 27 (2000) 1445-1460
30. Sohn M., Ursu S., Anderson J.R., Stenger V.A., and Carter C. The role of prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex in task switching. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97 (2000) 13448-13453
31. Swainson R., Cunnington R., Jackson G.M., Rorden C., Peters A.M., Morris P.G., and Jackson S.R. Cognitive control mechanisms revealed by ERP and fMRI: evidence from repeated task-switching. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 15 (2003) 785-799
32. Verleger R., Jaœkowski P., and Wascher E. Evidence for an integrative role of P3b in linking reaction to perception. J. Psychophysiol. 19 (2005) 165-181
33. Wylie G.R., Javitt D.C., and Foxe J.J. Task switching: a high-density electrical mapping study. NeuroImage 20 (2003) 2322-2342