-
1
-
-
0001268290
-
Processus de preuves et situations de validation
-
Balacheff, N. 1987. Processus de preuves et situations de validation. Educational Studies in Mathematics 18: 147-76.
-
(1987)
Educational Studies in Mathematics
, vol.18
, pp. 147-176
-
-
Balacheff, N.1
-
3
-
-
84931930393
-
Proof practices and constructs of advanced mathematical students
-
Coe, R., and K. Ruthven. 1994. Proof practices and constructs of advanced mathematical students. British Educational Research Journal 20: 41-53.
-
(1994)
British Educational Research Journal
, vol.20
, pp. 41-53
-
-
Coe, R.1
Ruthven, K.2
-
4
-
-
0345424649
-
Children’s responses to contrasting ‘realistic’ mathematics problems: Just how realistic are children ready to be?
-
Cooper, B., and T. Harries. 2002. Children’s responses to contrasting ‘realistic’ mathematics problems: Just how realistic are children ready to be? Educational Studies in Mathematics 49: 1-23.
-
(2002)
Educational Studies in Mathematics
, vol.49
, pp. 1-23
-
-
Cooper, B.1
Harries, T.2
-
5
-
-
8644260719
-
Categorizing pupils’ written answers to a mathematics test question: ‘I know but I can’t explain’
-
Evens, H., and J. Houssart. 2004. Categorizing pupils’ written answers to a mathematics test question: ‘I know but I can’t explain’. Educational Research 46: 269-82.
-
(2004)
Educational Research
, vol.46
, pp. 269-282
-
-
Evens, H.1
Houssart, J.2
-
7
-
-
0001099510
-
Students’ proof schemes: Results from exploratory studies
-
A. H. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, and E. Dubinsky, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society
-
Harel, G., and L. Sowder. 1998. Students’ proof schemes: Results from exploratory studies. In Research in collegiate mathematics III, ed. A. H. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, and E. Dubinsky, 234-82. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
-
(1998)
Research in Collegiate Mathematics III
, pp. 234-282
-
-
Harel, G.1
Sowder, L.2
-
10
-
-
84889993937
-
Is it ever appropriate to judge an argument by its author?
-
D. Hewitt, University of Bristol: BSRLM
-
Inglis, M., and J.P. Mejia-Ramos. 2006. Is it ever appropriate to judge an argument by its author? In Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, ed. D. Hewitt, Vol. 26, no. 2, 43-8. University of Bristol: BSRLM.
-
(2006)
Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics
, vol.26
, Issue.2
, pp. 43-48
-
-
Inglis, M.1
Mejia-Ramos, J.P.2
-
12
-
-
0002822485
-
Validity of web-based psychological research
-
M.H. Birnbaum, San Diego: Academic Press
-
Krantz, J.H., and R. Dalal. 2000. Validity of web-based psychological research. In Psychological experiments on the internet, ed. M.H. Birnbaum, 35-60. San Diego: Academic Press.
-
(2000)
Psychological Experiments on the Internet
, pp. 35-60
-
-
Krantz, J.H.1
Dalal, R.2
-
14
-
-
34247554966
-
Argumentation and participation in the primary mathematics classroom: Two episodes and related theoretical abductions
-
Krummheuer, G. 2007. Argumentation and participation in the primary mathematics classroom: Two episodes and related theoretical abductions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 26: 60-82.
-
(2007)
Journal of Mathematical Behavior
, vol.26
, pp. 60-82
-
-
Krummheuer, G.1
-
16
-
-
84926410207
-
Personal and public aspects of formal proof: A theory and a single-case study
-
D. Hewitt and A. Noyes, Coventry: BSRLM
-
Mejia-Ramos, J.P., and D. Tall. 2005. Personal and public aspects of formal proof: A theory and a single-case study. In Proceedings of the Sixth British Congress of Mathematics Education, ed. D. Hewitt and A. Noyes, 97-104. Coventry: BSRLM.
-
(2005)
Proceedings of the Sixth British Congress of Mathematics Education
, pp. 97-104
-
-
Mejia-Ramos, J.P.1
Tall, D.2
-
17
-
-
34547720099
-
Quelques outils pour l’analyse cognitive du rapport entre argumentation et demonstration
-
Pedemonte, B. 2005. Quelques outils pour l’analyse cognitive du rapport entre argumentation et demonstration. Recherches en Didactique des Mathematiques 25: 313-48.
-
(2005)
Recherches En Didactique Des Mathematiques
, vol.25
, pp. 313-348
-
-
Pedemonte, B.1
-
18
-
-
47949093201
-
Proof and justification in collegiate calculus
-
University of California, Berkeley
-
Raman, M. 2002. Proof and justification in collegiate calculus. PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.
-
(2002)
Phd Diss.
-
-
Raman, M.1
-
19
-
-
4544320620
-
Key ideas: What are they and how can they help us understand how people view proof?
-
Raman, M. 2003. Key ideas: What are they and how can they help us understand how people view proof? Educational Studies in Mathematics 52: 319-25.
-
(2003)
Educational Studies in Mathematics
, vol.52
, pp. 319-325
-
-
Raman, M.1
-
20
-
-
0001478626
-
On mathematical warrants: Proof does not always warrant, and a warrant may be other than a proof
-
Rodd, M.M. 2000. On mathematical warrants: Proof does not always warrant, and a warrant may be other than a proof. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 2: 221-44.
-
(2000)
Mathematical Thinking and Learning
, vol.2
, pp. 221-244
-
-
Rodd, M.M.1
-
21
-
-
0033074773
-
Learning about mathematical proof: Conviction and validity
-
Segal, J. 2000. Learning about mathematical proof: Conviction and validity. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 18: 191-210.
-
(2000)
Journal of Mathematical Behavior
, vol.18
, pp. 191-210
-
-
Segal, J.1
-
22
-
-
0037257290
-
Validations of proofs considered as texts: Can undergraduates tell whether an argument proves a theorem?
-
Selden, A., and J. Selden. 2003. Validations of proofs considered as texts: Can undergraduates tell whether an argument proves a theorem? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 34: 4-36.
-
(2003)
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
, vol.34
, pp. 4-36
-
-
Selden, A.1
Selden, J.2
-
23
-
-
34447135227
-
Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability
-
Stanovich, K.E., and R.F. West. 2006. Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability. Thinking and Reasoning 13: 225-47.
-
(2006)
Thinking and Reasoning
, vol.13
, pp. 225-247
-
-
Stanovich, K.E.1
West, R.F.2
-
24
-
-
0036457606
-
Classroom mathematical practices in differential equations
-
Stephan, M., and C. Rasmussen. 2002. Classroom mathematical practices in differential equations.Journal of Mathematical Behavior 21: 459-90.
-
(2002)
Journal of Mathematical Behavior
, vol.21
, pp. 459-490
-
-
Stephanrasmussen, M.1
-
26
-
-
85023706605
-
Forthcoming. How do mathematicians determine if an argument is a valid proof?
-
Weber, K. Forthcoming. How do mathematicians determine if an argument is a valid proof? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.
-
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
-
-
Weber, K.1
-
27
-
-
20444362130
-
Using warranted implications to understand and validate proofs
-
Weber, K., and L. Alcock. 2005. Using warranted implications to understand and validate proofs. For the Learning of Mathematics 25, no. 1: 34-8.
-
(2005)
For the Learning of Mathematics
, vol.25
, Issue.1
, pp. 34-38
-
-
Weber, K.1
Alcock, L.2
-
28
-
-
0002356643
-
Explanation, justification and argumentation in mathematics classrooms
-
M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, Utrecht, Holland: IGPME
-
Yackel, E. 2001. Explanation, justification and argumentation in mathematics classrooms. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on the Psychology of Mathematics Education, ed. M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, Vol. 1, 9-23. Utrecht, Holland: IGPME.
-
(2001)
Proceedings of the 25Th International Conference on the Psychology of Mathematics Education
, vol.1
, pp. 9-23
-
-
Yackel, E.1
|