A case study of the development of WebPA: An online peer-moderated marking tool

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 329-341

  Loddington, Steve ^a   Pond, Keith ^a   Wilkinson, Nicola ^b,d   Willmot, Peter ^c  

^a Business School   (United Kingdom)

^b Engineering Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning   (United Kingdom)

^c School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering

^d LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRITICAL EVALUATIONS; DEVELOPMENT PHASIS; FLEXIBLE TOOLS; GOOD PRACTICES; GROUP WORKS; HIGHER EDUCATIONS; ON-LINE ASSESSMENTS; PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICES; PEDAGOGICAL RESEARCHES; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

EDUCATION;

EID: 60349107663     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00922.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Blease, D. (2006). Group and team work guide. Retrieved August 12, 2008, from http://www.lboro.ac.uk/service/pd/gw/page-01.htm
2. Cheng, W. Warren, M. (1997). Having second thoughts: student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise. Studies in Higher Education 22, 2, 233 239.
3. Conway, R., Kember, D., Sivan, A. Wu, M. (1993). Peer assessment of an individual's contribution to a group project. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18, 1, 45 55.
4. Falchikov, N. (1986). Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative group and self-assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 11, 146 166.
5. Firdyiwek, Y. (1999). Web-based courseware tools: where is the pedagogy? Educational Technology, 39, 1, 29 34.
6. Freeman, M. McKenzie, J. (2002). SPARK, a confidential web-based template for self and peer assessment of student teamwork: benefits of evaluating across different subjects. The British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 5, 553 572.
7. Gatfield, T. (1999). Examining student satisfaction with group projects and peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, 4, 365 377.
8. Goldfinch, J. Raeside, R. (1990). Development of a peer assessment technique for obtaining individual marks on a group project. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 15, 3, 210 231.
9. Loddington, S. (2008a). Peer assessment of group work: a review of the literature. Retrieved August 13, 2008, from http://www.webpaproject.com/?q=node/ 288
10. Pond, K., Coates, D. Palermo, O. A. (2007). Student perceptions of peer review marking of team projects. Retrieved August 12, 2008, from http://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace/bitstream/2134/3040/1/ IJMEPaper%20190%20%23%20final2.pdf
11. Quality Assurance Agency (2000). Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education. Section 6: Assessment of students. Retrieved August 12, 2008, from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/ academicinfrastructure/codeOfPractice/section6/archive/default.asp
12. Quality Assurance Agency (2006). Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education. Section 6: Assessment of students. Retrieved August 12, 2008, from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/ academicinfrastructure/codeOfPractice/section6/default.asp#p4
13. Race, P. (2001). A briefing on self, peer and group assessment (No. 9) LTSN Generic Centre. Retrieved April 30, 2007, from http://www.phil-race.com/ files/self%20peer%20and%20group%20assessment.pdf
14. Robinson, C. L. (2006). Self and peer assessment in group work. Kongsberg : the SEFI MWG Seminar.
15. University, L. (2007). Academic procedures quality handbook. Section 3. (7). Retrieved August 22, 2008, from http://www.lboro.ac.uk/admin/ar/policy/aqp/ 3/index.htm
16. Wheater, P., Langan, M. Dunleavy, P. J. (2005). Students assessing student: case studies on peer assessment. Planet 15, 13 15. Retrieved February 8, 2008, from http://www.gees.ac.uk/planet/p15/p15.pdf
17. Willmot, P. Crawford, A. (2004). Online peer assessed marking of team projects. Paper presented at the International Conference on Engineering Education, Gainsville, FL.
18. Willmot, P. Crawford, A. (2005). Validating the assessment of individuals within undergraduate teams. Paper presented at the International Conference on Engineering Education, Gliwice, Poland.
19. Willmot, P. Crawford, A. (2007). Peer review of team marks using a web-based tool: an evaluation. Engineering Education 2, 1, 59 66.
20. Willmot, P., Pond, K., Loddington, S. Palermo, O. A. (2008). Perceptions of peer assessment in university teamwork. Paper presented at the International Conference Engineering Education, Pécs - Budapest, Hungary.