Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes

Eye

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 262-269

  Ceruti, P ^a   Morbio, R ^a   Marraffa, M ^a   Marchini, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Corneal thickness; Dynamic contour tonometry; Glaucoma; Goldmann applanation tonometry; Tonometry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APPLANATION TONOMETRY; ARTICLE; CLOSED ANGLE GLAUCOMA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA CURVATURE; CORNEA THICKNESS; DYNAMIC CONTOUR TONOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TONOMETER; TONOMETRY; CORNEA; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DEVICES; EVALUATION STUDY; GLAUCOMA, ANGLE-CLOSURE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; MIDDLE AGED; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY;

AGED; CORNEA; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, ANGLE-CLOSURE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 60149105326     PISSN: 0950222X     EISSN: 14765454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6703102     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 1993; 38: 1-30.
2. Inoue K, Okugawa K, Oshika T, Amano S. Morphological study of corneal endothelium and corneal thickness in pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2003; 47: 235-239.
3. Whitacre MM, Stein RA, Hassanein K. The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 1993; 115: 592-596.
4. Zadok D, Tran DB, Twa M, Carpenter M, Schanzlin DJ. Pneumotonometry versus Goldmann tonomerty after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999; 25: 1344-1348.
5. Mardelli PG, Piebenga LW, Whitacre MM, Siegmund KD. The effect of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy on intraocular pressure measurements using the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Ophthalmology 1997; 104: 945-948.
6. Park HJ, Uhm KB, Hong C. Reduction in intraocular pressure after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27: 303-309.
7. Rashad KM, Bahnassy AA. Changes in intraocular pressure after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 2001; 17: 420-427.
8. Duch S, Serra A, Castanera J, Abos R, Quintana M. Tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis treatment. J Glaucoma 2001; 10: 261-265.
9. Fournier AV, Podtetenev M, Lemire J, Thompson P, Duchesne R, Perreault C et al. Intraocular pressure change measured by Goldmann tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998; 24: 905-910.
10. Abbasoǧlu ÖE, Bowman RW, Cavanagh HD, Cavanagh HD, McCulley JP. Reliability of intraocular pressure measurements after myopic excimer photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 2193-2196.
11. Garzozi HJ, Chung HS, Yang Y, Kagemann L, Harris A. Intraocular pressure and photorefractive keratectomy; a comparison of three different tonometers. Cornea 2001; 20: 33-36.
12. Shah S, Chatterjee A, Mathai M, Kelly SP, Kwartz J, Henson D et al. Relationship between corneal thickness and measured intraocular pressure in a general ophthalmology clinic. Ophthalmology 1999; 106: 2154-2160.
13. Morad Y, Sharon E, Hefetz L, Nemet P. Corneal thickness and curvature in normal-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1998; 76: 319-324.
14. Copt RP, Thomas R, Mermoud A. Corneal thickness in ocular hypertension, primary open-angle glaucoma, and normal tension glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1999; 117: 14-16.
15. Brandt JD, Beiser JA, Kass MA, Gordon MO. Central corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). Ophthalmology 2001; 108: 1779-1788.
16. Kniestedt C, Michelle N, Stamper RL. Dynamic contour tonometry: a comparative study on human cadaver eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 2004; 122: 1287-1293.
17. Kanngiesser HE, Robert YCE. Dynamic contour tonometry [ARVO abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: E-Abstract 301.
18. Burvenich H, Burvenich E, Vincent C. Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) versus non-contact tonometry (NCT): a comparison study. Bull Soc Belge Ophthalmol 2005; 298: 63-69.
19. Schneider E, Grehn F. Intraocular pressure measurement - comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma 2006; 15: 2-6.
20. Ku JK, Danesh-Meyer HV, Craig JP, Gamble GD, McGhee CN. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Eye 2006; 20: 191-198.
21. Pache M, Wilmsmeyer S, Lautebach S, Funk J. Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry. A comparative study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005; 243: 763-767.
22. Hoffmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Intraocular pressure using dynamic contour tonometry and contact lens tonometry. BMC Ophthalmol 2004; 4: 4.
23. Kniestedt C, Lin S, Choe J, Nee M, Bostrom A, Stürmer J et al. Correlation between intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, stage of glaucoma, and demographic patient data: prospective analysis of biophysical parameters in tertiary glaucoma practice population. J Glaucoma 2006; 15: 91-97.
24. Kotecha A, White ET, Shewry JM, Garway-Heath DF. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 1572-1575.
25. Kniestedt C, Lin S, Choe J, Bostrom A, Nee M, Stamper RL. Clinical comparison of contour and applanation tonometry and their relationship to pachymetry. Arch Ophthalmol 2005; 123: 1532-1537.
26. Doyle A, Lachkar Y. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry over a wide range of central corneal thickness. J Glaucoma 2005; 14: 288-292.
27. Kniestedt C, Kanngiesser H, Stamper RL. Assessment of Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring IOP after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 458-459.
28. Duba I, Wirthlin AC. Dynamic contour tonometry for post-LASIK intraocular pressure measurements. Klin Monastbl Augenheilkd 2004; 221: 347-350.
29. Siganos DS, Papastergiou GI, Moedas C. Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 746-751.
30. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 3790-3794.
31. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 3118-3121.
32. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in Africa American Subjects. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 658-665.
33. Chylack LT, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, Leske MC, Bullimore MA, Bailey IL et al. The lens opacities classification system III. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 33: 153-159.
34. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8: 135-160.
35. Barleon L, Hoffmann EM, Berres M, Pfeiffer N, Grus FH. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 142: 583-590.
36. Francis BA, Hsieh A, Lai MY, Chopra V, Pena F, Azen S et al. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 20-26.
37. Viestenz A, Martus P, Schlotzer-Schrehardt U, Langenbucher A, Mardin CY. Impact of prostaglandin-F(2alpha)-analogues and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors on central corneal thickness - a cross-sectional study on 403 eyes. Klin Monatsnl Augenheilkd 2004; 221: 753-756.
38. Kaminski S, Hommer A, Koyuncu D, Biowski R, Barisani T, Baumgartner I. Influence of dorzolamide on corneal thickness, endothelial cell count and corneal sensibility. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998; 76: 78-79.
39. Punjabi OS, Ho HK, Kniestedt C, Bostrom AG, Stamper RL, Lin SC. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude comparisons in different types of glaucoma using dynamic contour tonometry. Curr Eye Res 2006; 31: 851-862.
40. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Robert YC, Thiel MA. Ocular pulse amplitude in healthy subjects as measured by dynamic contour tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol 2006; 124: 1104-1108.
41. Pache M, Wilmsmeyer S, Lautebach S, Funk J. Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmnann applanation tonometry: a comparative study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005; 243: 763-767.