Influence of proficiency level and constraints on viewpoint switching: A study in web design

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 126-137

  Chevalier, Aline ^a   Chevalier, Nicolas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS OUEST NANTERRE LA DÉFENSE   (France)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; RESEARCH; VERBALIZATION;

EID: 60149089991     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: 10990720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1448     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Altmann, E. M. (2004). Advance preparation in task switching. Psychological Science, 15, 616-622. DOI: 10.1111/ j.0956-7976.2004.00729
2. Anderson, J. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417-423. DOI:10.1016/ S1364-6613(00)01538-2
4. Ball, J. L., Evans, J. St. B. T., Thomas, I. D., &Ormerod, T. C. (1997). Problem-solving strategies and expertise in engineering design. Thinking & Reasoning, 3, 247-270. DOI: 10.1080/135467897394284
5. Bastien, J. M. C., Scapin, D. L., & Leulier, C. (1999). The ergonomic criteria and the ISO/DIS 9241-10 dialogue principles: A pilot comparison in an evaluation task. Interacting with Computers, 11, 299-322. DOI: 10.1080/135467897394284
6. Bilda, Z., Gero, J. S., & Purcell, T. (2006). To sketch or not to sketch? That is the question. Design Studies, 27, 587-613. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2006.02.002
7. Bloom, P., & Keil, F. C. (2001). Thinking through language. Mind & Language, 16, 351-367.
8. Bucciarelli, L. (1988). An ethnographic perspective on engineering design. Design Studies, 9, 159-168. DOI:10.1016/ 0142-694X(88)90045-2
9. Chevalier, A. (2002). Le rôle du contexte et du niveau d'expertise des concepteurs de sites web sur la prise en compte de contraintes. [The role of context and expertise level of web designers on the constraints taken into account]. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Provence, Aix-en-Provence, France.
10. Chevalier, A. (2005). Évaluer un site Web: les concepteurs et les utilisateurs parviennent-ils à identifier les problèmes d'utilisabilité? [Assessing a web site: Can designers and users identify usability problems?] Revue d'Intelligence Artificielle, 19, 319-338.
11. Chevalier, A., & Bonnardel, N. (2007). Articulation of web site design constraints: Effects of the task and designers' expertise. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2455-2472. DOI: 10.1016/ j.chb.2006.04.001
12. Chevalier, A., & Cegarra, J. (accepted). Une approche psychologique de la notion de contrainte en résolution de problèmes [A psychological approach to constraint in problem solving]. Le Travail Humain.
13. Chevalier, A., Fouquereau, N., & Vanderdonckt, J. (in press). The influence of a knowledge-based system on the designers' cognitive activities: A study involving professional web designers. Behaviour & Information Technology, DOI: 0.1080/01449290701288833
14. Chevalier, A., & Ivory,M. Y. (2003).Web site designs: Influence of designer's experience and design constraints. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 57-87. DOI: 10.1016/ S1071-5819(02)00126-X
15. Chrysikou, E. G., & Weisberg, R. W. (2005). Following the wrong footsteps: Fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 31, 1134-1148. DOI: 10.1037/ 0278-7393.31.5.1134
16. Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies, 25, 427-441. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.001
17. Ericsson, K. A. (2005). Recent advances in expertise research: A commentary on the contributions to the special issue. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 223-241. DOI: 10.1002/acp. 1111
18. Ericsson, K. A. Charness, N. Feltovich, P. J.&Hoffman R. R. (Eds.), (2006). Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (revised edition). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Fustier, M. (1989). La résolution de problèmes: met́hodologie de l'action. [The problem solving: Methology of action]. Paris: Editions ESF & Libraries Techniques.
21. Gero, J. S. (1990). Design prototypes: A knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine, 11, 26-36.
22. Gero, J. S., & Mc Neill, T. (1998). An approach to the analysis of design protocols. Design Studies, 19, 21-61. DOI: 10.1016/ S0142-694X(97)00015-X
23. Guindon, R. (1990). Designing the design process: Exploiting opportunistic thoughts. Human Computer Interaction, 5, 305-344.
24. Hinds, P. J. (1999). The curse of expertise: The effects of expertise and debiasing methods on predictions of novice performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, 205-221. DOI: 10.1037/ 1076-898X.5.2.205
25. Hoffman, R. R., Roesler, A., & Moon, B. M. (2004). What is design in the context of Human- Centered Computing? IEEE: Intelligent Systems, 89-95.
26. Hornbuk, K. (2006). Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64, 79-102. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.06.002
27. Kim, H., & Yoon, W. C. (2005). Supporting the cognitive process of user interface design with reusable design cases. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62, 457-486. DOI: 10.1016/ j.ijhcs.2004.12.001
28. Lane, S. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2004). Skimming the surface. Verbal overshadowing of analogical retrieval. Psychological Science, 15, 715-719. DOI:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00747x
29. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100. DOI: 10.1006/cogp. 1999.0734
30. Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134-140. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7
31. Munakata, Y. (2001). Graded representations in behavioral dissociations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 309-315. DOI: 10.1016/ S1364-6613(00)01682-X
32. Newman, M.W., & Landay, J. A. (2000). Sitemaps, storyboards, and specifications: A sketch of web site design practice. In D. Boyarski, & W. A. Kellogg (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, Techniques (pp. 263-274). New York City: ACM Press.
33. Nielsen, J. (2000). Designing web usability. Indianapolis: New Riders Publishing.
34. Norman, D. A., & Draper S. W. (Eds.), (1986). User centered system design: New perspectives on human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Nückles, M., & Bromme, R. (2002). Internet experts' planning of explanations for laypersons: A web experimental approach in the Internet domain. Experimental Psychology, 49, 292-304. DOI: 10.1027/ 1618-3169.49.4.292
36. Olsson, E., & Jansson, A. (2005). Participatory design with train drivers - process analysis. Interacting with Computers, 17, 147-166. DOI: 10.1016/j.intcom.2004.11.001
37. Schooler, J. W. (2002). Verbalization produces a transfer inappropriate processing shift. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 989-997. DOI: 10.1002/acp. 930
38. Shiose, T., Yamanaka, T., Higuchi, A., & Taura, T. (2001). Viewpoint dynamics and creative design: Inferences from analytical methods based on explanation. Proceedings of the 5th computational and cognitive models of creative design 2001, Heron Island, Australia, December.
39. Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4, 181-201.
40. Stefik, M. J. (1981). Planning with constraints. MOLGEN: part 1. Artificial Intelligence, 16, 111-140.
41. Wetzstein, A., & Hacker, W. (2004). Reflective verbalization improves solutions - the effects of question-based reflection in design problem solving. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 145-156. DOI: 10.1002/ acp. 949
42. Zaphiris, P., & Kurniawan S. (Eds.), (2006). Human computer interaction research in web design and evaluation. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.