The tYNA platform for comparative interactomics: A web tool for managing, comparing and mining multiple networks

Bioinformatics

Volumn 22, Issue 23, 2006, Pages 2968-2970

  Yip, Kevin Y ^a   Yu, Haiyuan ^b   Kim, Philip M ^c   Schultz, Martin ^a   Gerstein, Mark ^a,c  

^a Yale University   (United States)

^b DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CELL CONTACT; CLASSIFICATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONSTANTS AND COEFFICIENTS; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION SYSTEM; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; POSITIVE FEEDBACK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 33751375646     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl488     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Alfarano,C. et al. (2005) The Biomolecular Interaction Network database and related tools: 2005 update. Nucleic Acids Res., 33, D418-D424.
2. Batagelj,V. and Mrvar,A. (2003) Pajek - analysis and visualization of large networks. In Jünger,M. and Mutzel,P. (eds), Graph Drawing Software. Springer, pp. 77-103.
3. Cheung,K.H. et al. (2005) YeastHub: A semantic web use case for integrating data in the life sciences domain. Bioinformatics, 21 (Suppl. 1), i85-i96.
4. Gavin,A.-C. et al. (2006) Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature, 440, 631-636.
5. Han,J.-D.H. et al. (2004) Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein-protein interaction network. Nature, 430, 88-93.
6. Ito,T. et al. (2000) Toward a protein-protein interaction map of the budding yeast: A comprehensive system to examine two-hybrid interactions in all possible combinations between the yeast proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 4569-4574.
7. Joshi-Tope,G. et al. (2005) Reactome: A knowledgebase of biological pathways. Nucleic Acids Res., 33, D428-432.
8. Krogan,N.J. et al. (2006) Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature, 440, 637-643.
9. Lee,T.I. et al. (2002) Transcriptional regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science, 298, 799-804.
10. Luscombe,N.M. et al. (2004) Genomic analysis of regulatory network dynamics reveals large topological changes. Nature, 431, 308-312.
11. Milo,R. et al. (2002) Network motifs: Simple building blocks of complex networks. Science, 298, 824-827.
12. Myers,C.L. et al. (2005) Discovery of biological networks from diverse functional genomic data. Genome Biol., 6, R114.
13. Shannon,P. et al. (2003) Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res., 13, 2498-2504.
14. Sharan,R. and Ideker,T. (2006) Modeling cellular machinery through biological network comparison. Nat. Biotechnol., 24, 427-433.
15. Shen-Orr,S.S. et al. (2002) Network motifs in the transcriptional regulation network of Escherichia coli. Nat. Genet., 31, 64-68.
16. Uetz,P. et al. (2000) A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature, 403, 623-627.
17. Xenarios,I. et al. (2002) DIP, the Database of Interacting Proteins: A research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res., 30, 303-305.
18. Yu,H. et al. (2004) TopNet: A tool for comparing biological subnetworks, correlating protein properties with topological statistics. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, 328-337.
19. Yu,H. et al. (2006) Predicting interactions in protein networks by completing defective cliques. Bioinformatics, 22, 823-829.
20. Zanzoni,A. et al. (2002) MINT: A Molecular INTeraction Database. FEBS Lett., 513, 135-140.