The WIT cohort: A case study of informal doctoral mentoring

Journal of Further and Higher Education

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 411-426

  Mullen, Carol A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 59849111857     PISSN: 0309877X     EISSN: 14699486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0309877032000128109     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. BlAKE-BEARD, S.D., 2001. Taking a hard look at formal mentoring programs: a consideration of potential challenges facing women. Journal of Management Development, 20(4): 331–345.
2. CAFFARELLA, R.S., and BARNETT, B.G., Teaching doctoral students writing: negotiating the borders between the world of practice and doctoral study Paper presented at the. Annual (Convention of the University (Council for Educational Administration. Orlando, FL.
3. CAFFARELLA, R.S., and BARETT, B.G., 2000. Teaching doctoral students to become scholarly writers: the importance of giving and receiving critiques. Studies in Higher Education, 25(1): 39–52.
4. CAMPBELL., T.A., and CAMPBELL, D.E., 1997. Faculty/student mentor program: effects on academic performance and retention. Research in Higher Education, 38: 727–742.
5. CHAO, G.T., O'LEARY-KELLY, A.M., WOLF, S., KLEIN, H.J., and GARDNER, P.D., 1994. Organizational socialization: its content and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5): 730–743.
6. CHAO, G.T., WALTZ, P.M., and GARDNER, P.D., 1992. Formal and informal mentorships: a comparison of mentoring function and contrast with nonmentored counterparts. Personnel Psychology, 45: 619–716.
7. COLE, A.L., and HUNT, D.E., eds. 1994. The Doctoral Dissertation Journey: reflections from travellers and guides, Toronto: OISE Press.
8. DINHAM, S., and SCOTT, C., 2001. The experience of disseminating the results of doctoral research. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25(1): 45–55.
9. DORN, S., and PAPALEWIS, R., Improving doctoral student retention, Paper presented at the. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL.
10. GROSS, R. A., 2002. From 'Old boys' to mentors. The (Chronicle of Higher Education, 28 February: 1–5. Available at: http://chronicle.com/jobs/2002/02/2002022801c.htm
11. HENRICH, K.T., 1991. Loving partnerships: dealing with sexual attraction and power in doctoral advisement relationships. Journal of Higher Educalion, 62(5): 514–538.
12. HORN, R.A., 2001. Promoting social justice and caring in schools and communities: the unrealised potential of the cohort model. Journal of School leadership, 11: 313–334.
13. HUBER, T., Teachers as researchers and reformers: a site-based master of education program in curriculum and instruction, Paper presented at the. Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. Chicago, IL.
14. LIEBERMAN, A., and GROLNICK, M., 1997. “ Networks, reform, and the professional growth of teachers ”. In Rethinking Educational (Change with Heart and Mind, Edited by: HARGRHAVES, A., Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
15. LORTIE, D.C., 1998. Teaching educational administration: reflections on our craft. The Journal of Cases in Educational leadership, 1(1): 1–12. Available at: hrtp://www.ucea.org/cases
16. MILES, M.B., and HUBERMAN, A.M., 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: an expanded sourcebook, 2nd Edn, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. MULLEN, C.A., 1999. 'What I needed to know to get published': teaching (frightened) graduate students to write for publication. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 10(2): 27–52.
18. MULLEN, C.A., 2001. The need for a curricular writing model for graduate students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25(1): 117–126.
19. MULLEN, C.A., and KEALY, W.A., 1999. Breaking the circle of one: developing professional cohorts to address challenges of mentoring for teacher educators. Teacher Educators Journal, 9(1): 35–50.
20. MURPHY, J., and FORSYTH, P.B., 1999. “ A decade of change: an overview ”. In Educational Administration: a decade of reform, Edited by: MURPHY, J., and FORSYTH, P.B., Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
21. MURRAY, B., 2000. The growth of the new Ph.D.: higher education takes a hard look at the Ph.D. and finds much that needs changing. APA Monitor on Psychology, 31(10): 24–27.
22. NYQUIST, J.D., and WOOODFORD, B.J., 2000. Re-envisioning the Ph.D.: what concerns do we have?, Seattle, WA: Center for Instructional Development and Research and University of Washington.
23. NYQUIST, J.D., MANNING, L., WULFF, D.H., AUSTIN, A.E., SPRAGUE-, J., FRASER, P.K., CALCAGNO, C., and WOODFORD, B., 1999. On the road to becoming a professor: the graduate student experience. Change, 31(3): 18–27.
24. ORPEN, C., 1997. The effects of formal mentoring on employee work motivation, organizational commitment and job performance. The learning Organization, 4(2): 53–60.
25. SANDLER, B.R., 1995. Women as mentors: myths and commandments. Educational Horizons, 7(2): 105–107.
26. SEIDMAN, I.E., 1991. Interviewing as Qualitative Research: a guide for researchers in education and the social sciences, New York: Teachers College Press.
27. STYLES, I., and RADLOFF, A., 2001. The synergistic thesis: student and supervisor perspectives. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25(1): 97–106.
28. TWALK, D.J., and KOCHAN, F.K., 2000. Assessment of an alternative cohort model for pan-time students in an educational leadership program. Journal of School leadership, 10: 188–208.
29. WITTE, J.E., and JAMES, W.B., 1998. Cohort partnerships: a pragmatic approach to doctoral research. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 79: 53–62.