Rule and meaning in the teaching of grammar

Linguistics and Language Compass

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 199-221

  Davis, Joseph ^a  

^a CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 59849103898     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1749818X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00119.x     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Anderson, S. R. 1999. A formalist's reading of some functionalist work in syntax. Functionalism and formalism in linguistics, Vol. 1: General papers, ed. by M. Darnell, E. Moravscik, F. Newmeyer, M. Noonan, and K. Wheatley, 111-35. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
2. Bolinger, D. 1967. Adjectives in English: Attribution and predication. Lingua 18.1-34.
3. Bybee, J. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
4. Cadierno, T., and K. Lund. 2004. Cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition: Motion events in a typological framework. Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition, ed. by Bill VanPatten, Jessica Williams and Susanne Rott, 139-54. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Celce-Murcia, M. 2002. Why it makes sense to teach grammar in context and through discourse. New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms, ed. by E. Hinkel and S. Fotos, 119-33. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Celce-Murcia, M., and D. Larsen-Freeman. 1999. The grammar book: An ESL/ EFL teacher's course. n.p.: Heinle & Heinle.
7. Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
8. Chomsky, N. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.
9. Cohen, D. 2003. Lesson plan: Noun number. School of Education, The City College of New York, ms.
10. Contini-Morava, E. 1995. Introduction: On linguistic sign theory. Meaning as explanation: Advances in linguistic sign theory, ed. by E. Contini-Morava and B. S. Goldberg, 1-39. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
11. Contini-Morava, E., and Y. Tobin. (eds.). 2000. Between grammar and lexicon. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
12. Crupi, C. 2006. Structuring cues of conjunctive yet, but, and still: A monosemic approach. Advances in functional linguistics: Columbia School beyond its origins, ed. by J. Davis, R. Gorup and N. Stern, 263-81. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
13. Crystal, D. 1985. A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. New York: Basil Blackwell.
14. Davis, J. 2002. A surpassingly simple analysis. Signal, meaning, and message: Perspectives on sign-based linguistics, ed. by W. Reid, R. Otheguy, and N. Stern, 113-36. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
15. de Jonge, B. 2004. The relevance of relevance in linguistic analysis. Cognitive and communicative approaches to linguistic analysis, ed. by E. Contini-Morava, R. S. Kirsner and B. Rodríguez-Bachiller, 205-18. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
16. DeKeyser, R. M. 1998. Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, ed. by C. Doughty and J. Williams, 42-63. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. DeKeyser, R. M. 2001. Automaticity and automatization. Cognition and second language instruction, ed. by P. Robinson, 125-51. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Diver, W. 1995. Theory. Meaning as explanation: Advances in linguistic sign theory, ed. by E. Contini-Morava and B. S. Goldberg, 43-114. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
19. Doughty, C., and J. Williams. 1998a. Issues and terminology. Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, ed. by C. Doughty, and J. Williams, 1-11. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Doughty, C., and J. Williams. 1998b. Pedagogical choices in focus on form. Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, ed. by C. Doughty and J. Williams, 197-261. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Doughty, C., and J. Williams (eds.). 1998. Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Ellis, N. C. 2004. The processes of second language acquisition. Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition, ed. by B. VanPatten, J. Williams, and S. Rott, 49-76. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Ellis, R. 2002. The place of grammar instruction in the second/foreign language curriculum. New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms, ed. by E. Hinkel and S. Fotos, 17-34. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Garrett, N. 1986. The problem with grammar: What kind can the language learner use? Modern Language Journal 70(ii).133-48.
25. Goldberg, B. S. 1995. The -ra and -se opposition in Spanish. Meaning as explanation: Advances in linguistic sign theory, ed. by E. Contini-Morava and B. S. Goldberg, 381-404. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
26. Gorokhova, E. 1995. Acquisition of English articles by native speakers of Spanish. Meaning as explanation: Advances in linguistic sign theory, ed. by E. Contini-Morava and Goldberg B. S., 441-52. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
27. Gorup, R. 2002. Serbo-Croatian Deixis: Balancing attention with difficulty in processing. Signal, meaning, and message: Perspectives on sign-based linguistics, ed. by W. Reid, R. Otheguy and N. Stern, 137-55. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
28. Gorup, R. 2006. Se without Deixis. Advances in functional linguistics: Columbia School beyond its origins, ed. by J. Davis, R. Gorup, and N. Stern, 195-209. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
29. Halliday, M. A. K. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar. (3rd ed.) Revised by C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. London: Arnold.
30. Hirtle, W. 2007. Lessons on the English verb: No expression without representation. Montreal and Kingston/London/Ithaca, NY: McGill-Queen's University Press.
31. Huffman, A. 1997. The categories of grammar: French lui and le. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
32. Huffman, A. 2002. Cognitive and semiotic modes of explanation in functional grammar. Signal, meaning, and message: Perspectives on sign-based linguistics, ed. by W. Reid, R. Otheguy and N. Stern, 311-37. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
33. Jean, G. 2005. Intégration de la grammaire dans l'enseignement des langues secondes: Le cas des exercises grammaticaux. Canadian Modern Language Review/Revue canadienne des langues vivantes 61(4).519-42.
34. Klein, E. C. 2004. Beyond syntax: Performance factors in L2 behavior. Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition, ed. by B. VanPatten, J. Williams and S. Rott, 155-77. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35. Krashen, S., and T. Terrell. 1983. The natural approach. New York: Pergamon.
36. Langacker, R. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, volume I: theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
37. Langacker, R. 2001. Cognitive linguistics, language pedagogy, and the English present tense. Applied cognitive linguistics: Volume 1. Language pedagogy, ed. by M. Pütz, S. Niemeier and R. Dirven, 3-39. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
38. Larsen-Freeman, D. 2002. The grammar of choice. New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms, ed. by E. Hinkel and S. Fotos, 103-18. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39. Larsen-Freeman, D. 2003. Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Boston: Thomson-Heinle.
40. Larsen-Freeman, D. 2004. Reflections on form-meaning connection research in second language acquisition. Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition, ed. by B. VanPatten, J. Williams and S. Rott, 238-44. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41. Long, M. H. 1996. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. Handbook of second language acquisition, ed. by W. C. Ritchie and T. K. Bhatia, 413-68. New York: Academic Press.
42. Long, M. H., and P. Robinson. 1998. Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, ed. by C. Doughty and J. Williams, 15-41. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43. Miller, L. J. 1996. Their name are Juan and Rosa: Understanding and responding to noun number errors in ESL writing. TESOL Journal 6(2).20-3.
44. Mohan, B., and G. H. Beckett. 2003. A functional approach to research on content-based language learning: Recasts in causal explanations. Modern Language Journal 87 (ii).421-32.Originally published in Canadian Modern Language Review/Revue canadienne des langues vivantes 58(1).133-55.
45. Newmeyer, F. 1991. Functional explanation in linguistics and the origins of language. Language and Communication 11(1/2).3-28.
46. Newmeyer, F. 1999. Some remarks on the functionalist-formalist controversy in linguistics. Functionalism and formalism in linguistics, Vol. 1: General papers, ed. by M. Darnell, E. Moravscik, F. Newmeyer, M. Noonan, and K. Wheatley. 469-86. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
47. Noonan, M. 1999. Non-structuralist syntax. Functionalism and formalism in linguistics, Vol. 1: General papers, ed. by M. Darnell, E. Moravscik, F. Newmeyer, M. Noonan, and K. Wheatley. 11-31. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
48. Norris, J. M., and L. Ortega. 2000. Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning 50(3).417-528.
49. Otheguy, R. 2002. Saussurean anti-nomenclaturism in grammatical analysis: A comparative theoretical perspective. Signal, meaning, and message: Perspectives on sign-based linguistics, ed. by W. Reid, R. Otheguy and N. Stern, 373-403. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
50. Reid, W. 1991. Verb and noun number in English: A functional explanation. London: Longman.
51. Reid, W. 2004. Monosemy, homonymy and polysemy. Cognitive and communicative approaches to linguistic analysis, ed. by E. Contini-Morava, R. S. Kirsner and B. Rodríguez-Bachiller, 93-129. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
52. Saussure, F. 1915 [1972]. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.
53. Smalley, R. L., and M. K. Ruetten. 1990. Refining composition skills: rhetoric and grammar for ESL students (3rd edn). New York: Maxwell Macmillan.
54. Spada, N. 1997. Form-focussed instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching 29.1-15.
55. Stern, N. 2006. Tell me about yourself: A unified account of English-self pronouns. Advances in functional linguistics: Columbia School beyond its origins, ed. by J. Davis, R. Gorup and N. Stern, 177-94. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
56. Strauss, S., Lee, J., and K. Ahn. 2006. Applying conceptual grammar to advanced-level language teaching: The case of two completive constructions in Korean. Modern Language Journal 90(ii).185-209.
57. Swain, M. 1998. Focus on form through conscious reflection. Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, ed. by C. Doughty and J. Williams, 64-81. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58. Terrell, T. 1982. The natural approach to language teaching: An update. Modern Language Journal 66(2).121-32.
59. Terrell, T. 1991. The role of grammar instruction in a communicative approach. Modern Language Journal 75(1).52-63.
60. VanPatten, B., and T. Cadierno. 1993. Input processing and second language acquisition: A role for instruction. Modern Language Journal 77.45-57.
61. VanPatten, B., J. Williams, and S. Rott. 2004. Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition. Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition, ed. by B. VanPatten, J. Williams and S. Rott, 1-26. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
62. VanPatten, B., J. Williams, and S. Rott (eds.). 2004. Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
63. White, J. 1998. Getting the learners' attention: A typographical input enhancement study. Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, ed. by C. Doughty and J. Williams, 85-113. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
64. Williams, J., and J. Evans. 1998. What kind of focus and on which forms? Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, ed. by C. Doughty, and J. Williams, 139-55. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.