Reflections on form-meaning connection research in second language acquisition

Form-Meaning Connections in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 251-259

  Larsen Freeman, Diane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917121537     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410610607     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Bod, R., Hay, J., and Jannedy, S. (2001, January). Probability theory in linguistics. A symposium presented at the Linguistic Society of America Meeting, Washington, DC.
2. Broeder, P. and Plunkett, K. (1994). Connectionism and second language acquisition. In N.Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 421-453). London:Academic Press.
3. Cooper, D. (1999). Linguistic attractors: The cognitive dynamics of language acquisition and change. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
4. Ellis, N. (1998). Emergentism, connectionism and language learning. Language Learning, 48, 631-664.
5. Ellis, N. (2003). Constructions, chunking, and connectionism. In C.Doughty & M.Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 63-103). Malden, MA:Blackwell.
6. Elman, J., Bates, E., Johnson, M., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1998). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
7. Hopper, P. (1988). Emergent grammar and the a priori grammar postulate. In D.Tannen (Ed.), Linguistics in context: Connecting observation and understanding (pp. 117-134). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
8. Hopper, P. (1998). Emergent grammar. In M.Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language (pp. 155-175). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
9. Keenan, J., & MacWhinney, B. (1987). Understanding the relationship between comprehension and production. In H.Dechert & M.Raupach (Eds.), Psycholinguistic models of production (pp. 149-155). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
10. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1985). State of the art on input in second language acquisition. In S. Gass & C.Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 433-444). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
11. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1991). Second language acquisition research: Staking out the territory. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 315-350.
12. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1995). On the teaching and learning of grammar: Challenging the myths. In F.Eckman, D.Highland, P.Lee, J.Mileham, & R.Rutkowski Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 131-150). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 18, 141-165.
14. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Teaching grammar. In M.Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed., pp. 365-266). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
15. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Boston:Heinle & Heinle.
16. Larsen-Freeman, D., Kuehn, T., & Haccius, M. (2002). Helping students in making appropriate English verb tense-aspect choices. TESOL Journal 11, 3-9.
17. MacWhinney, B. (Ed.). (1999). The emergence of language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Pinker, S. and Prince, A. (1994). Regular and irregular morphology and the psychological status of rules of grammar. In S.Lima, R.Corrigan, & G.Iverson (Eds.), The reality of linguistic rules (pp. 321-351). Amsterdam: Benjamins.