A novel robot device in rehabilitation of post-stroke hemiplegic upper limbs

Aging Clinical and Experimental Research

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 531-535

  Masiero, Stefano ^a   Celia, Andrea ^a   Armani, Mario ^a   Rosati, Giulio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cerebrovascular accident; Recovery of function; Rehabilitation; Robotics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONVALESCENCE; EXERCISE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NERVE STIMULATION; NEUROLOGY; NEUROMUSCULAR FACILITATION; ROBOTICS; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

AGED; FEMALE; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARESIS; REHABILITATION; ROBOTICS; STROKE; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 33847682279     PISSN: 15940667     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03324854     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Stroke Prevention and Educational Awareness Diffusion (SPREAD). The Italian guidelines for stroke prevention and treatment. Milano: Ed. Hyperphar Group 2003: 45-51.
2. Nudo RJ, Wise BM, Sifuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 1996; 272: 1791-94.
3. Johansson B. Brain plasticity and stroke rehabilitation - The Willis Lecture. Stroke 2000; 31: 223-30.
4. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N. Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option? Curr Opin Neurol 2001; 14: 745-52.
5. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelstein L, Diels C, Aisen M. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology 2000; 54: 1938-44.
6. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC, Majmundar M, Van der Loos M. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 952-9.
7. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Kahn LE, Averbuch M, Mckenna-Cole A, Smith BD, Rymer WZ. Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM Guide. J Rehabil Res Dev 2000; 37: 653-62.
8. Hesse S, Schulte-Tigges G, Konrad M, Bardeleben A, Werner C. Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 915-20.
9. Colombo R, Pisano F, Micera S, et al. Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2005; 13: 311-24.
10. Fanin C, Gallina P, Rossi A, Zanatta U, Masiero S. Nerebot: a wire-based robot for neurorehabilitation. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Seoul, Korea 2003: 23-7.
11. Butefish C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz H. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurologic Sci 1995; 130: 59-68.
12. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman L, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post stroke hemiplegic patient. Scand J Rehab Med 1975; 7: 13-31.
13. Demeurisse G, Demol O, Robaye E. Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. Eur Neurol 1980; 19: 382-9.
14. Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FF. The Functional Independence Measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. In Eisenberg MG, Grzesiak RC. Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation. Vol 1. New York, NY: Springer Verlag; 1987: 6-18.
15. Functional Independence Measure: versione italiana-manuale d'uso. Ricerca in Riabilitazione. 1992; 2 (Suppl): 1-44.
16. Medical Research Council. Aids to the examination of the peripheral nervous system. Memorandum n°45. London: Her Majesty's Stationary Office 1976.
17. Chae JC, Johnston MV, Kim H, Zorowitz RD. Admission motor impairment as a predictor of physical disability after stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 74: 218-23.
18. Hesse S, Schmidt H, Werner C, Bardeleben A. Upper and lower extremity robotic devices for rehabilitation and for studying motor control. Curr Opin Neurology 2003; 16: 705-10.
19. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Wagenaar RC. Long term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomised trial. J Neural Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 72: 473-9.
20. Halder P, Sterr A, Brem S, Bucher K, Kollias S, Brandeis D. Electrophysiological evidence for cortical plasticity with movement repetition. Eur J Neurosci 2005; 21: 2271-7.
21. Stinear JW, Byblow WD. Rhythmic bilateral movement training modulates corticomotor excitability and enhances upper limb motricity poststroke: a pilot study. J Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 21: 124-31.
22. Hayashi S, Hasegawa Y, Kasai T. Transcranial magnetic stimulation study of plastic changes of human motor cortex after repetitive simple muscle contractions. Percept Mot Skills 2002; 95: 699-705.
23. Plautz EJ, Milliken GW, Nudo RJ. Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: role of use versus learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2000; 74: 27-55.
24. Kozlowski DA, Schallert T. Relationship between dendritic pruning and behavioral recovery following sensorimotor cortex lesions. Behav Brain Res 1998; 97: 89-98.