Estimating the spatiotemporal pattern of volumetric growth rate from fate maps in chick limb development

Developmental Dynamics

Volumn 238, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 415-422

  Morishita, Yoshihiro ^a,b   Iwasa, Yoh ^b  

^a JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

^b KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cell trajectory; Chick; Data analysis; Fate map; Limb; Volumetric growth rate

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL GROWTH; CELL INTERACTION; CHICK EMBRYO; LIMB DEVELOPMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MORPHOGENESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VOLUMETRY;

ANIMALS; BODY PATTERNING; CARTILAGE; CHICKENS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; WING;

EID: 59649100049     PISSN: 10588388     EISSN: 10970177     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.21840     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Akaike H. 1974. A new look at statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Control 19:716-723.
2. Bishop CM. 2006. Pattern recognition and machine learning. New York: Springer-Verlag.
3. Boulet AM, Moon AM, Arenkiel BR, Capecchi MR. 2004. The roles of Fgf4 and Fgf8 in limb bud initiation and outgrowth. Dev Biol 273:361-372.
4. Bowen J, Hinchliffe JR, Horder TJ, Reeve AMF. 1989. The fate map of the chick forelimb-bud and its bearing on hypothesized developmental control mechanisms. Anat Embryol (Berl) 179:269-283.
5. Caruccio NC, Martinez-Lopez A, Harris M, Dvorak L, Bitgood J, Simandl BK, Fallon JF. 1999. Constitutive activation of sonic hedgehog signaling in the chicken mutant talpid: Shh-independent outgrowth and polarizing activity. Dev Biol 209:86-97.
6. Clarke JD, Tickle C. 1999. Fate maps old and new. Nat Cell Biol 1:E103-E109.
7. Crampin EJ, Hackborn WW, Maini PK. 2002. Pattern formation in reaction-diffusion models with nonuniform domain growth. Bull Math Biol 64:747-769.
8. Fernandez-Teran MA, Hinchliffe JR, Ros MA. 2006. Birth and death of cells in limb development: a mapping study. Dev Dyn 235:2521-2537.
9. Hirashima T, Iwasa Y, Morishita Y. 2008. Distance between AER and ZPA is defined by feed-forward loop and is stabilized by their feedback loop in vertebrate limb bud. Bull Math Biol 70:438-459.
10. Hornbruch A, Wolpert L. 1970. Cell division in the early growth and morphogenesis of the chick limb. Nature 226:764-766.
11. Johnson RL, Tabin CJ. 1997. Molecular models for vertebrate limb development. Cell 90:979-990.
12. Lewis JH. 1975. Fate maps and the pattern of cell division: a calculation for the chick wing-bud. J Embryol Exp Morphol 33:419-434.
13. Lu P, Minowada G, Martin GR. 2005, Increasing Fgf4 expression in the mouse limb bud causes polysyndactyly and rescues the skeletal defects that result from loss of Fgf8 function. Development 133:33-42.
14. Martin GR. 1998. The roles of FGFs in the early development of vertebrate limbs. Genes Dev 12:1571-1586.
15. McGlinn E, Tabin CJ. 2006. Mechanistic insight into how Shh patterns the vertebrate limb. Curr Opin Genet Dev 16:426-432.
16. Mechali M, Lutzmann M. 2008. The cell cycle: now live and in color. Cell 132:341-343.
17. Mercader N, Leonardo E, Azpiazu N, Serrano A, Morata G, Martinez C, Torres M. 1999. Conserved regulation of proximodistal limb axis development by Meis1/Hth. Nature 402:425-429.
18. Mercader N, Leonardo E, Piedra ME, Martinez C, Ros MA, Torres M. 2000. Opposing RA and FGF signals control proximodistal vertebrate limb development through regulation of Meis genes. Development 127:3961-3970.
19. Moon AM, Capecchi MR. 2000. Fgf8 is required for outgrowth and patterning of the limbs. Nat Genet 26:455-459.
20. Morishita Y, Iwasa Y. 2008a. Growth based morphogenesis of vertebrate limb bud. Bull Math Biol 70:1957-1978.
21. Morishita Y, Iwasa Y. 2008b. Optimal placement of multiple morphogen sources. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 77(pt 1):041909.
22. Niederreither K, Vermot J, Schuhbaur B, Chambon P, Dolle P. 2002. Embryonic retinoic acid synthesis is required for forelimb growth and anteroposterior patterning in the mouse. Development 129:3563-3574.
23. Parr BA, McMahon AP. 1995. Dorsalizing signal Wnt-7a required for normal polarity of D-V and A-P axes of mouse limb. Nature 374:350-353.
24. Pearse RV Jr, Scherz PJ, Campbell JK, Tabin CJ. 2007. A cellular linage analysis of the chick limb bud. Dev Biol 310:388-400.
25. Reiter RS, Solursh M. 1982. Mitogenic property of the apical ectodermal ridge. Dev Biol 93:28-35.
26. Riddle RD, Johnson RL, Laufer E, Tabin C. 1993. Sonic hedgehog mediates the polarizing activity of the ZPA. Cell 75:1401-1416.
27. Sato K, Koizumi Y, Takahashi M, Kuroiwa A, Tamura K. 2007. Specification of cell fate along the proximal-distal axis in the developing chick limb bud. Development 134:1397-1406.
28. Salazar-Ciudad I, Jernvall J, Newman S. 2003. Mechanisms of pattern formation in development and evolution. Development 130:2027-2037.
29. Saunders JW Jr. 1948. The proximo-distal sequence of origin of the parts of the chick wing and the role of the ectoderm. J Exp Zool 108:363-404.
30. Sordino P, Duboule D. 1996. A molecular approach to the evolution of vertebrate paired appendages. Trends Ecol Evol 11:114-119.
31. Stark RJ, Searls RL. 1973. A description of chick wing bud development and a model of limb morphogenesis. Dev Biol 33:138-153.
32. Tabin D, Wolpert L. 2007. Rethinking the proximodistal axis of the vertebrate limb in the molecular era. Genes Dev 21:1433-1442.
33. Tickle C. 2006. Making digit patterns in the vertebrate limb. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:45-53.
34. Vargesson N, Clarke JDW, Vincent K, Coles C, Wolpert L, Tickle C. 1997. Cell fate in the chick limb bud and relationship to gene expression. Development 124:1909-1918.
35. Wolpert L, Beddington R, Jessell TM, Lawrence P, Meyerowitz EM, Smith J. 2006. Principles of development. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Yashiro K, Zhao X, Uehara M, Yamashita K, Nihsijima M, Nishino J, Saijoh Y, Sakai Y, Hamada H. 2004. Regulation of retinoic acid distribution is required for proximodistal patterning and outgrowth of the developing mouse limb. Dev Cell 6:411-422.