The influence of surgical approach on cemented stem stability: An RSA study

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 448, Issue , 2006, Pages 87-91

  Glyn Jones, S ^a   Alfaro Adrian, J ^a   Murray, D W ^a   Gill, H S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b NUFFIELD ORTHOPAEDIC CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATION; STEREOPHOTOGRAMMETRY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; ARTICLE; FOLLOW UP; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS; RADIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BONE CEMENT;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE CEMENTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33746894793     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000224006.25636.cc     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Alfaro-Adrian J, Gill HS, Murray DW. Cement migration after THR. A comparison of Charnley Elite and Exeter femoral stems using RSA. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:130-134.
2. Alfaro-Adrian J, Gill HS, Murray DW. Should total hip arthroplasty femoral components be designed to subside? A radiostereometric analysis study of the Charnley Elite and Exeter stems. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:598-606.
3. Altman D. Practical Statisitics for Medical Research. London, Chapman and Hall, 1990.
4. Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Strauss J, Duda GN. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech. 2001;34:859-871.
5. Darling B. National Joint Registry for England and Wales. 2004.
6. Gill HS, Alfaro-Adrian J, Alfaro-Adrian C, McLardy-Smith P, Murray DW. The effect of anteversion on femoral component stability assessed by radiostereometric analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:997-1005.
7. Glyn-Jones S, Gill HS, Beard DJ, McLardy-Smith P, Murray DW. Influence of stem geometry on the stability of polished tapered cemented femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:921-927.
8. Gore DR, Murray MP, Sepic SB, Gardner GM. Anterolateral compared to posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: differences in component positioning, hip strength, and hip motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;165:180-187.
9. Karrholm J, Borssen B, Lowenhielm G, Snorrason F. Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:912-917.
10. Karrholm J, Nivbrant B, Thanner J, Anderberg C, Borlin N, Herberts P, Malchau H. Radiostereometric Evaluation of Hip Implants Design and Surface Finish. Micromotion of Cemented Femoral Stems. In 67th Annual Meeting AAOS. 2000. Orlando.
11. Karrholm J, Snorrason F. Subsidence, tip, and hump micromovements of noncoated ribbed femoral prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;287:50-60.
12. Kiss J, Murray DW, Turner-Smith AR, Bithell J, Bulstrode CJ. Migration of cemented femoral components after THR. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:796-801.
13. Kobayashi A, Donnelly WJ, Scott G, Freeman MA. Early radiological observations may predict the long-term survival of femoral hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:583-589.
14. Loudon JR, Charnley J. Subsidence of the femoral prosthesis in total hip replacement in relation to the design of the stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1980;62:450-453.
15. Madsen MS, Ritter MA, Morris HH, Meding JB, Berend ME, Faris PM, Vardaxis VG. The effect of total hip arthroplasty surgical approach on gait. J Orthop Res. 2004;22:44-50.
16. Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T, Garellick G, Soderman P. The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(Suppl 2):2-20.
17. Manley MT, D'Antonio JA, Capello WN, Edidin AA. Osteolysis: a disease of access to fixation interfaces. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;405:129-137.
18. Nilsson KG, Karrholm J. RSA in the assessment of aseptic loosening. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:1-3.
19. Perka C, Heller M, Wilke K, Taylor WR, Haas NP, Zippel H, Duda GN. Surgical approach influences periprosthetic femoral bone density. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;432:153-159.
20. Ritter MA, Harty LD, Keating ME, Faris PM, Meding JB. A clinical comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;385:95-99.
21. Roberts JM, Fu FH, McClain EJ, Ferguson AB Jr. A comparison of the posterolateral and anterolateral approaches to total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;187:205-210.
22. Stefansdottir A, Franzen H, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Sundberg M. Movement pattern of the Exeter femoral stem; a radiostereometric analysis of 22 primary hip arthroplasties followed for 5 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:408-414.
23. Williams HD, Browne G, Gie GA, Ling RS, Timperley AJ, Wendover NA. The Exeter universal cemented femoral component at 8 to 12 years. A study of the first 325 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:324-334.