PanCGH: A genotype-calling algorithm for pangenome CGH data

Bioinformatics

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 309-314

  Bayjanov, Jumamurat R ^a   Wels, Michiel ^a,b,c   Starrenburg, Marjo ^b,d   van Hylckama Vlieg, Johan E T ^b,c,d   Siezen, Roland J ^a,b,c,d   Molenaar, Douwe ^b,c,d  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b NIZO FOOD RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

^c TOP INSTITUTE FOOD AND NUTRITION   (Netherlands)

^d KLUYVER CENTRE FOR GENOMICS OF INDUSTRIAL FERMENTATION   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL DNA;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BACTERIUM ISOLATION; BIOINFORMATICS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA MICROARRAY; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; LACTOCOCCUS; LACTOCOCCUS HORDNIAE; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS CREMORIS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; ORTHOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; SUBSPECIES;

LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS;

EID: 59549102977     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn632     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Cleveland,W.S. et al. (1992) Local regression models. In Chambers,J.M. and Hastie,T.J. (eds) Chapter 8 of Statistical Models in S. Wadsworth & Brooks, Cole, pp. 312-316.
2. Earl,A.M. et al. (2007) Bacillus subtilis genome diversity. J. Bacteriol., 189, 1163-1170.
3. Fields Development Team. (2006) Fields: Tools for Spatial Data. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO. Available at http://www.image.ucar.edu/Software/Fields/ (last accessed August, 2008).
4. Fitch,W.M. (1970) Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins. Syst. Zool., 19, 99-113.
5. Francke,C. et al. (2008) A generic approach to identify transcription factor-specific operator motifs; inferences for LacI-family mediated regulation in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. BMC Genomics, 9, 145.
6. Fukiya,S. et al. (2004) Extensive genomic diversity in pathogenic Escherichia coli and Shigella Strains revealed by comparative genomic hybridization microarray. J. Bacteriol., 186, 3911-3921.
7. Golding,G.B. and Dean,A.M. (1998) The structural basis of molecular adaptation. Mol. Biol. Evol., 15, 355-369.
8. Hanley,J.A. and McNeil,B.J. (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143 29-36.
9. Hastie,T. et al. (2001) The Elements of Statistical Learning Springer, New York.
10. Hua,J. et al. (2007) SNiPer-HD: Improved genotype calling accuracy by an expectation-maximization algorithm for high-density SNP arrays. Bioinformatics, 23, 57-63.
11. Inazawa,J. et al. (2004) Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)-arrays pave the way for identification of novel cancer-related genes. Cancer Sci., 95, 559-563.
12. Kallioniemi,A. et al. (1992) Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science, 258 818-821.
13. Khojasteh,M. et al. (2005) A stepwise framework for the normalization of array CGH data. BMC Bioinformatics, 6, 274.
14. Koonin,E.V. (2005) Orthologs, paralogs, and evolutionary genomics, Annu. Rev. Genet., 39, 309-338.
15. Lan,R. and Reeves,P.R. (2000) Intraspecies variation in bacterial genomes: The need for a species genome concept. Trends Microbiol., 8, 396-401.
16. Makarova,K. et al. (2006) Comparative genomics of the lactic acid bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 15611-15616.
17. Medini,D. et al. (2005) The microbial pan-genome. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 15, 589-594.
18. Molenaar,D. et al. (2005) Exploring Lactobacillus plantarum genome diversity by using microarrays. J. Bacteriol., 187, 6119-6127.
19. Neuvial,P. et al. (2006) Spatial normalization of array-CGH data. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 264.
20. Notebaart,R.A. et al. (2005) Correlation between sequence conservation and the genomic context after gene duplication, Nucleic Acids Res., 33, 6164-6171.
21. Plagnol,V. et al. (2007) A method to address differential bias in genotyping in large-scale association studies. PLoS Genet., 3 e74.
22. Pretzer,G. et al. (2005) Biodiversity-based identification and functional characterization of the mannose-specific adhesin of Lactobacillus plantarum. J. Bacteriol., 187, 6128-6136.
23. R Development Core Team (2007) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
24. Rademaker,J.L. et al. (2007) Diversity analysis of dairy and nondairy Lactococcus lactis isolates, using a novel multilocus sequence analysis scheme and (GTG)5-PCR fingerprinting. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 73, 7128-7137.
25. Rasmussen,T.B. et al. (2008) Streptococcus thermophilus core genome: Comparative genome hybridization study of 47 strains, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 74, 4703-4710.
26. Remm,M. et al. (2001) Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs from pairwise species comparisons. J. Mol. Biol., 314, 1041-1052.
27. Salzberg,S.L. et al. (1998) Microbial gene identification using interpolated Markov models. Nucleic Acids Res., 26, 544-548.
28. Sasik,R. et al. (2002) Statistical analysis of high-density oligonucleotide arrays: A multiplicative noise model. Bioinformatics 18, 1633-1640.
29. Siezen,R.J. et al. (2008) Genome-scale genotype-phenotype matching of two Lactococcus lactis isolates from plants identifies mechanisms of adaptation to the plant niche. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 74 424-436.
30. Sturges,H.A. (1926) The Choice of a Class Interval. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 21, 65-66.
31. Teo,Y.Y. et al. (2007) A genotype calling algorithm for the Illumina Bead Array platform. Bioinformatics, 23, 2741-2746.
32. Wegmann,U. et al. (2007) Complete genome sequence of the prototype lactic acid bacterium Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363. J. Bacteriol., 189, 3256-3270.
33. Xiao,Y. et al. (2007) A multi-array multi-SNP genotyping algorithm for Affymetrix SNP microarrays. Bioinformatics, 23, 1459-1467.
34. Yuan,D.S. and Irizarry,R.A. (2006) High-resolution spatial normalization for microarrays containing embedded technical replicates. Bioinformatics, 22, 3054-3060.
35. Zdobnov,E.M. and Apweiler,R. (2001) InterProScan-an integration platform for the signature-recognition methods in InterPro. Bioinformatics, 17, 847-848.