Intra-group interaction and the development of norms which promote inter-group hostility

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 130-144

  Smith, Laura G E ^a   Postmes, Tom ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 59349117429     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.464     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Allport, F. H. (1924). Social psychology. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
2. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Amiot, C. E., & Bourhis, R. Y. (2003). Discrimination and the positive-negative asymmetry effect: Ideological and normative processes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 597-608.
4. Amiot, C. E., & Bourhis, R. Y. (2005). Discrimination between dominant and subordinate groups: The positive-negative asymmetry effect and normative processes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 289-308.
5. Bettencourt, B. A., Dorr, N., Charlton, K., & Hume, D. L. (2001). Status differences and discrimination: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin, 24, 520-542.
6. Bourhis, R. Y., Sachdev, I., & Gagnon, A. (1994). Intergroup research with the Tajfel matrices: Methodological notes. In M. P. Zanna, & J. M. Olsen (Eds.), The social psychology of prejudice; The Ontario symposium (Vol. 7, pp. 209-232). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Bornstein, G., Crum, L., Wittenbraker, J., Harring, K., Insko, C. A., & Thibaut, J. (1983). On the measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 321-350.
8. Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429-444.
9. Caporael, L. R. (2001). Parts and wholes: The evolutionary importance of groups. In C. Sedikides, & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Individual self, relational self, collective self (pp. 241-258). Philadelphia, PA, US: Psychology Press.
10. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Ellemers, N. (1.993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. In W. Stroebe, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 27-57). Hilsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., & Ouwerkerk, J. (1999). Self-categorisation, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 371-389.
13. Goldhagen, D. J. (1997). Hitler's willing executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. London: Abacus.
14. Haslam, S. A. (2004). Psychology in organisations: The social identity approach (2nd. ed.). London: Sage Publications.
15. Haslam, S. A., Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., McGarty, C., & Reynolds, K. J. (1998). The group as a basis for emergent stereotype consensus. European Review of Social Psychology, 28, 755-776.
16. Hastie, R., & Kameda, T. (2005). The robust beauty of majority rules in group decisions. Psychological Review, 112, 494-508.
17. Hobsbawn, E. J. (1995). The age of extremes: The short twentieth century 1914-1991. London: Abacus.
18. Judd, C. M., McClelland, G. H., & Culhane, S. C. (1995). Data analysis: Continuing issues in the everyday analysis of psychological data. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 433-465.
19. Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 125-135.
20. Mummendey, A., & Otten, S. (1998). Positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination. In W. Stroebe, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology, 9, 107-143.
21. Mummendey, A., Simon, B., Dietze, C., Grünert, M., Haeger, G., Kessler, S., et al. (1992). Categorization is not enough: Intergroup discrimination in negative outcome allocation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 125-144.
22. Postmes, T., Baray, G., Haslam, S. A., Morton, T., & Swaab, R. I. (2006). The dynamics of personal and social identity formation. In T. Postmes, & J. Jetten (Eds.), Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity (pp. 215-236). London: Sage.
23. Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Swaab, R. (2005). Social influence in small groups: An interaction model of social identity formation. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 1-42.
24. Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and anti-normative behaviour: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238-259.
25. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Lee, T., & Novak, R. (2005). Individuality and social influence in groups: Inductive and deductive routes to group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 747-763.
26. Reicher, S. (1996). "The battle of Westminster:" Developing the social identity model of crowd behaviour in order to explain the initiation and development of collective conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 115-134.
27. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Richerson, P. J. (2004). Not by genes alone; How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast analyses: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Sassenberg, K., Kessler, T., & Mummendey, A. (2003). Less negative = more positive? Social discrimination as avoidance or approach. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 48-58.
31. Sherif, M. (1967). Group conflict, and cooperation: Their social psychology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
32. Smith, L. G. E., & Postmes, T. (in preparation). The power of talk: Legitimising hostile social action.
33. Stott, C., & Drury, J. (2000). Crowds, context and identity: Dynamic categorization processes in the 'poll tax riot'. Human Relations, 53, 247-273.
34. Stott, C., & Drury, J. (2004). The importance of social structure and social, interaction in stereotype consensus and content: Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts? European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 11-24.
35. Struch, N., & Schwartz, S. H. (1989). Intergroup aggression: Its predictors and distinctness from in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 364-373.
36. Swaab, R., Postmes, T., van Beest, I., & Spears, R. (2007). Shared cognition as a product of, and precursor to, shared identity in negotiations. Personality And Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 187-199.
37. Tajfel, H., Billig, M., Bundy, R., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
38. Turner, J. C. (1983). The measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm - Some comments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 351-367.
39. Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
40. Turner, J. C. (2005). Explaining the nature of power: A three-process theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 1-22.
41. Turner, M. E., Pratkanis, A. R., & Samuels, T. (2003). Identity metamorphosis and groupthink prevention: Examining Intel's departure from, the DRAM industry. In S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organisational practice (pp. 117-136). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
42. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
43. Wilkinson, L., & The APA Task Force on. Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.
44. Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994-1003.