Identification of sociometric subtypes among boys and girls aged 6 to 11;Identificación de subtipos sociométricos en niños y niñas de 6 a 11 años *

Revista Mexicana de Psicologia

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 209-222

  García Bacete, Francisco Juan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT JAUME I   (Spain)

Author keywords

Aggression; Heterogeneity; Peer rejection; Primary education; Sociability

Indexed keywords

EID: 59149088463     PISSN: 01856073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adler, P. A. & Adler, P. (1998). Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
2. Andreou, E. (2006). Social preference, perceived popularity and social intelligence. Relations to overt and relational aggression. School Psychology International, 27, 339-351.
3. Asher, S. R., Rose, A. J. & Gabriel, S. W. (2001). Peer rejection in everyday life. En M. R. Leary (Ed.), Interpersonal rejection (pp. 105-142). Nueva York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4. Bagwell, C. L., Coie, J. D., Terry, R A. & Lochman, J. E. (2000). Peer clique participation and social status in preadolescence. Merril-Palmer Quarterly, 46, 280-305.
5. Bierman, K. L. (2004). Peer rejection: developmental processes and intervention strategies. Nueva York, NY: The Guilford Press.
6. Cairns, R. B. & Cairns, B. D. (1994). Lifelines and risks: Pathways of youth in our time. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Cerezo, F. & Ato, M. (2005). Bullying in Spanish and English pupils. A sociometric perspective using the Bull-s questionnaire. Educational Psychology, 25(4), 353-368.
8. Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A. & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 557-570.
9. Cillessen, A. H. N. & Rose, A. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14 (2), 102-105.
10. Cillessen, A. H. N., Van IJzendoorn, H. W., Van Lieshout, C. F. M. & Hartup, W. W. (1992). Heterogeneity among peerrejected boys: subtypes and stabilities. Child Development, 63, 893-905.
11. Estell, D. B., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., Van Acker, R. & Rodkin, P. C. (2003). Heterogeneity in the relationship between popularity and aggression: individual, group, and classroom influences. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 101, 75-85.
12. French, D. G. (1988). Heterogeneity of peer-rejected boys: aggressive and nonaggressive subtypes. Child Development, 59, 976-985.
13. French, D. G. (1990). Heterogeneity of peer-rejected girls. Child Development, 61, 2028-2031.
14. García-Bacete, F.J. (2006). La identificación de los alumnos rechazados. Comparación de métodos sociométricos de nominaciones bidimensionales. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 29(4), 437-451.
15. García-Bacete, F. J. (2007). La identificación de alumnos rechazados, preferidos, ignorados y controvertidos en el aula. Revista de Psicología Generaly Aplicada, 60 (1-2), 25-46.
16. García-Bacete, F.J., Sureda, I. & Monjas, I. (2008). Distributión sociométrica en las aulas de chicos y chicas a lo largo de la escolaridad. Revista de Psicología Social, 23 (1), 63-74.
17. García-Bacete, F.J., Lara, A., & Monjas, I. (2005). ¿Por qué los niños no quieren jugar con otros niños? Un análisis exploratorio de los motivos de rechazo entre iguales. En I. Fajardo, F. Vicente, A. Ventura, I. Ruiz. & J. A. Del Barrio (Eds.), Aportaciones psicológicas y mundo actual dando respuestas (pp. 257-268). Badajoz: Psicoex.
18. Gifford-Smith, M. E. & Brownell, C. A. (2003). Childhood peer relationships: social acceptance, friendships, and peer networks. Journal of School Psychology, 41, 235-284.
19. Harris, A. W., Zaia, A. F., Bates, J. E., Dodge, K. A., & Pettit, G. S. (1997). Subtypes of social withdrawal in early childhood: Sociometric status and social-cognitive differences across four years. Child Development, 68(2), 278-294.
20. Hymel, Sh., Vaillancourt, T., McDougall, P. & Renshaw, P. (2002). Peer acceptance and peer rejection in childhood. En P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart (Eds.), Handbook of childhood social development (pp. 265-284). UK: Blackwell.
21. Ladd, G. W. (1999). Peer relationships and social competence during early and middle childhood. Annual of Review Psychology, 50, 333-359.
22. Lardon, C. & Jason, L. A. (1992). Validating a brief pupil evaluation inventory. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 20 (4), 367-376.
23. Lease, A. M., Musgrove, K.T.& Axelrod, J. L. (2002). Dimensions of social status in preadolescent peer groups: Likeability, perceived popularity, and social dominance. Social Development, 11 (4), 514-533.
24. Miller-Johnson, Sh., Costanzo, Ph. R., Coie, J. D., Rose, M. R., Browne, D. C. & Johnson, C. (2003). Peer Social Structure and Risk-Taking Behaviors Among African American Early Adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32 (5), 375-384.
25. Moreno, M. C. (1999). Desarrollo y conducta social de los 6 años a la adolescencia. En J. Palacios, A. Marchesi & C. Coll (Comps.), Desarrollo psicológico y educación (pp. 405-430). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
26. Newcomb, A. F. & Bukowski, W. M. (1983). Social impact and social preference as determinants of children's peer group status. Developmental Psychology, 19 (6), 856-867.
27. Newcomb, A. F., Bukowski, W. M. & Pattee, L. (1993). Children's peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99-128.
28. Pekarik, E. G., Prinz, R. J., Liebert, D. E., Weintraub, S. & Neale, J. M. (1976). The pupil evaluation inventory. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 4, 83-97.
29. Pérez, C. (2005). Métodos estadísticos avanzados en SPSS. Madrid: Thompson.
30. Parkhurst, J. T. & Hopmeyer, A. G. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18(2), 125-144.
31. Putallaz, M., Grimes, Ch. L., Foster, K. J., Kupersmidt, J. B., Coie, J. D. & Dearing, K. (2007). Overt and relational aggression and victimization: Multiple perspectives within the school setting. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 523-547.
32. Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R. & Van Acker, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36, 14-24.
33. Rodríguez, A. & Morera, D. (2001). El sociograma. Estudio de las relaciones informales en las organizaciones. Madrid: Pirámide.
34. Rubin, K. H., LeMare, L.J. & Lollis, S. (1990). Social withdrawal in childhood: Developmental pathways to rejection. En S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 217-249). Nueva York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
35. Rubin, K. H., Burgess, K. B. & Coplan, R. J. (2002). Social withdrawal and shyness. En P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart (Eds.), Handbook of childhood social development (pp. 329-352). UK: Blackwell.
36. Villanueva, L. (1996). El rechazo entre iguales y la perceptión de patrones asociados. Tesis de Licenciatura. Castellón: Universitat Jaume I.
37. Visauta, B. (1998). Análisis estadísticos con SPSS para Windows. Estadística multivariate. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
38. Warden, D. & Mackinnon, S. (2003). Prosocial children, bullies and victims: An investigation of their sociometric status, empathy and social-problem-solving strategies. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 367-385.
39. Wentzel, K. R. (2003). Sociometric status and adjustment in middle school: A longitudinal study. Journal of Early Adolescence, 23 (1), 5-26.
40. Zettergren, P. (2007). Cluster analysis in sociometric research: A pattern-oriented approach to identifying temporally stable peer status group of girls. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 27 (1), 90-114.