Comparison of association methods for dense marker data

Genetic Epidemiology

Volumn 32, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 791-799

  Bacanu, Silviu Alin ^a   Nelson, Matthew R ^a   Ehm, Margaret G ^a  

^a GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adjustment for multiple testing; Bonferroni; FDR; Genome scan; Linkage disequilibrium; Multipoint; q value; Single point

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC CORRELATION; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENOTYPE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LINKAGE ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; ALLELE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DOMINANT GENE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC PROCEDURES; HAPLOTYPE; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; RECESSIVE GENE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ALLELES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENES, DOMINANT; GENES, RECESSIVE; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETIC TECHNIQUES; GENOME, HUMAN; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPES; HUMANS; LINKAGE (GENETICS); LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MODELS, GENETIC; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE;

EID: 58949086544     PISSN: 07410395     EISSN: 10982272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20347     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Chapman JM, Cooper JD, Todd JA, Clayton DG. 2003. Detecting disease associations due to linkage disequilibrium using haplotype tags: a class of tests and the determinants of statistical power. Hum Hered 56:18-31.
2. Dudbridge F, Koeleman BP. 2004. Efficient computation of significance levels for multiple associations in large studies of correlated data, including genomewide association studies. Am J Hum Genet 75:424-435.
3. 2 association tests of complex diseases for tightly linked markers. Hum Genomics 2:90-112.
4. Fan R, Knapp M. 2003. Genome association studies of complex diseases by case-control designs. Am J Hum Genet 72:850-868.
5. Fan R, Jung J, Jin L. 2006. High-resolution association mapping of quantitative disease loci: a populatiort-based approach. Genetics 172:663-686.
6. Genz A, Bretz F. 1999. Numerical computation of multivariate t-probabilities with application to power calculation of multiple contrasts. J Stat Comput Simulation 63:361-378.
7. Kimmel G, Shamir R. 2006. A fast method for computing high-significance disease association in large population-based studies. Am J Hum Genet 79:481-492.
8. Klein RJ, Zeiss C, Chew EY, Tsai JY, Sackler RS, Haynes C, Henning AK, SanGiovanni JP, Mane SM, Mayne ST, Bracken MB, Ferris FL, Ott J, Barnstable C, Hoh J. 2005. Complement factor H polymorphism in age-related macular degeneration. Science 308:385-399.
9. Lettre C, Lange C, Hirschhorn JN. 2007. Genetic model testing and statistical power in population-based association studies of quantitative diseases. Genetic Epidemiol 31:358-362.
10. Lin DY. 2005. An efficient Monte Carlo approach to assessing statistical significance in genomic studies. Bioinformatics 21:781-787.
11. Longmate JA. 2001. Complexity and power in case-control association studies. Am J Hum Genet 68:1229-1237.
12. Olsson U. 1979. Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika 44:443-460.
13. R Development Core Team. 2006. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing,,ISBN 3-900051-07-0. URL: http://www.R-project.org.
14. Rinaldo A, Bacanu SA, Devlin B, Sonpar V, Wasserman L, Roeder K. 2005. Characterization of multilocus linkage disequilibrium. Genet Epidemiol 28:193-206.
15. Roeder K, Bacanu SA, Sonpar V, Zhang X, Devlin B. 2005. Analysis of single-locus tests to detect gene/disease associations. Genet Epidemiol 28:207-219.
16. Sasieni PD. 1997. From genotypes to genes: doubting the sample size. Biometrics 53:1253-1261.
17. Schaid DJ, McDonnell SK, Hebbring SJ, Cunningham JM, Thibodeau SN. 2005. Nonparametric tests of association of multiple genes with human disease. Am J Hum Genet 76:780-793.
18. Seaman SR, Müller-Myhsok B. 2005. Rapid simulation of P values for product methods and multiple-testing adjustment in association studies. Am J Hum Genet 76:399-408.
19. Shah SH, Kraus WE, Crossman DC, Granger CB, Haines JL, Jones CJ, Mooser V, Huang L, Haynes C, Dowdy E, Vega GL, Grundy SM, Vance JM, Hauser ER. 2006. Serum lipids in the GENECARD study of coronary artery disease identify quantitative disease loci and phenotypic subsets on chromosomes 3q and 5q. Ann Hum Genet 70:738-748.
20. Storey JD. 2002. A direct approach to false discovery rates. J R Stat Soc Ser B 64:479-498.
21. Storey JD, Tibshirani R. 2003. Statistical significance for genome-wide experiments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:9440-9445.
22. Storey JD, Taylor JE, Siegmund D. 2004. Strong control, conservative point estimation, and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: a unified approach. J R Stat Soc London Ser B 66:187-205.
23. Thomas DC, Haile RW, Duggan D. 2005. Recent developments in genomewide association scans: a workshop summary and review. Am J Hum Genet 77:337-345.
24. Van den Oord EJ, Sullivan PF. 2003. False discoveries and models for gene discovery. Trends Genet 19:537-542.
25. 2 test for genome association studies. Am J Hum Genet 70:1257-1268.