A randomized trial of breakthrough pain during combined spinal-epidural versus epidural labor analgesia in parous women

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 108, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 246-251

  Goodman, Stephanie R ^a,b   Smiley, Richard M ^a   Negron, Maria A ^a   Freedman, Paula A ^a   Landau, Ruth ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b NewYork Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUPIVACAINE; FENTANYL; LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT; NARCOTIC ANALGESIC AGENT;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABOR; LABOR PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OBSTETRIC ANALGESIA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPINAL ANESTHESIA; TREATMENT RESPONSE; UTERINE CERVIX DILATATION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; INFUSION; INTRACTABLE PAIN; METHODOLOGY; PARITY; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; ANALGESIA, EPIDURAL; ANALGESIA, OBSTETRICAL; ANALGESICS, OPIOID; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; BUPIVACAINE; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; FENTANYL; HUMANS; INFUSIONS, PARENTERAL; LABOR PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, INTRACTABLE; PARITY; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 58749106448     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818f896f     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Simmons S, Cyna A, Dennis A, Hughes D. Combined spinalepidural versus epidural analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;3:CD003401
2. Tsen LC, Thue B, Datta S, Segal S. Is combined spinal-epidural analgesia associated with more rapid cervical dilation in nulliparous patients when compared with conventional epidural analgesia? Anesthesiology 1999;91:920-5
3. Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial (COMET) Study Group UK. Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2001;358:19-23
4. Norris MC, Fogel ST, Conway-Long C. Combined spinalepidural versus epidural labor analgesia. Anesthesiology 2001; 95:913-20
5. Hess PE, Pratt SD, Lucas TP, Miller CG, Corbett T, Oriol N, Sarna MC. Predictors of breakthrough pain during labor epidural analgesia. Anesth Analg 2001;93:414-8
6. Van de Velde M, Teunkens A, Hanssens M, Vandermeersch E, Verhaeghe J. Intrathecal sufentanil and fetal heart rate abnormalities: a double-blind, double placebo-controlled trial comparing two forms of combined spinal epidural analgesia with epidural analgesia in labor. Anesth Analg 2004;98:1153-9
7. Hepner DL, Gaiser RR, Cheek TG, Gutsche BB. Comparison of combined spinal-epidural and low dose epidural for labour analgesia. Can J Anaesth 2000;47:232-6
8. Dunn S, Connelly N, Steinberg R, Lewis TJ, Bazzel CM, Klatt JL, Parker RK. Intrathecal sufentanil versus epidural lidocaine with epinephrine and sufentanil for early labor analgesia. Anesth Analg 1998;87:331-5
9. Bucklin B, Chestnut D, Hawkins J. Intrathecal opioids versus epidural local anesthetics for labor analgesia: a meta-analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2002;27:23-30
10. Wong CA, Scavone BM, Peaceman AM, McCarthy RJ, Sullivan JT, Diaz NT, Yaghmour E, Marcus RL, Sherwani SS, Sproviero MT, Yilmaz M, Patel R, Robles C, Grouper S. The risk of cesarean delivery with neuraxial analgesia given early versus late in labor. N Engl J Med 2005;352:655-65
11. Sia AT, Camann WR, Ocampo CE, Goy RW, Tan HM, Rajammal S. Neuraxial block for labour analgesia-is the combined spinal epidural (CSE) modality a good alternative to conventional epidural analgesia? Singapore Med J 2003;44:464-70
12. Thomas JA, Pan PH, Harris LC, Owen MD, D'Angelo R. Dural puncture with a 27-gauge Whitacre needle as part of a combined spinal-epidural technique does not improve labor epidural catheter function. Anesthesiology 2005;103:1046-51
13. Pan PH, Bogard TD, Owen MD. Incidence and characteristics of failures in obstetric neuraxial analgesia and anesthesia: a retrospective analysis of 19,259 deliveries. Int J Obstet Anesth 2004;13:227-33
14. Swenson JD, Wisniewski M, McJames S, Ashburn MA, Pace NL. The effect of prior dural puncture on cisternal cerebrospinal fluid morphine concentrations in sheep after administration of lumbar epidural morphine. Anesth Analg 1996;83:523-5
15. Bernards CM, Kopacz DJ, Michel MZ. Effect of needle puncture on morphine and lidocaine flux through the spinal meninges of the monkey in vitro. Implications for combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1994;80:853-8
16. Blumgart CH, Ryall D, Dennison B, Thompson-Hill LM. Mechanism of extension of spinal anaesthesia by extradural injection of local anaesthetic. Br J Anaesth 1992;69:457-60
17. Stienstra R, Dahan A, Alhadi BZ, van Kleef JW, Burm AGL. Mechanism of action of an epidural top-up in combined spinal epidural anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1996;83:382-6
18. Vartis A, Collier CB, Gatt SP. Potential intrathecal leakage of solutions injected into the epidural space following combined spinal epidural anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care 1998;26: 256-61
19. Polley LS, Columb MO, Naughton NN, Wagner DS, Dorantes DM, van de Ven JM. Effect of intravenous versus epidural fentanyl on the minimum local analgesic concentration of epidural bupivacaine in labor. Anesthesiology 2000;93:122-8
20. Stocks GM, Hallworth SP, Fernando R, Engl AJ, Columb MO, Lyons G. Minimum local analgesic dose of intrathecal bupivacaine in labor and the effect of intrathecal fentanyl. Anesthesiology 2001;94:593-8