Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery: A randomised controlled trial

Lancet

Volumn 358, Issue 9275, 2001, Pages 19-23

  Shennan, A H ^a  

^a ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANESTHESIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTINUOUS INFUSION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DOSE RESPONSE; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NULLIPARA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REDUCTION; RESUSCITATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

EID: 0035822273     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)05251-X     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. National obstetric anaesthetic practice in the UK 1997/1998
2. A survey of epidural analgesia for labour in the United Kingdom
3. Epidural versus non-epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour (Cochrane Review)
4. Randomised comparison of combined spinal-epidural and standard epidural analgesia in labour
5. Bupivacaine versus bupivacaine plus fentanyl for epidural analgesia: Effect on maternal satisfaction
6. Epidural analgesia compared with combined spinal-epidural analgesia during labour in nulliparous women
7. The dura is too vulnerable to be breached routinely in labour
8. Epidural anesthesia for labor in an ambulatory patient
9. Neonatal welfare and placental transfer of fentanyl and bupivacaine during ambulatory combined spinal epidural analgesia for labour
10. Lack of effect of walking on labour and delivery