Genetic changes at specific stages of breast cancer progression detected by comparative genomic hybridization

Journal of Molecular Medicine

Volumn 87, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 145-152

  Gao, Yuxia ^a   Niu, Yun ^a   Wang, Xiaowei ^b   Wei, Li ^a   Lu, Song ^c  

^a TIANJIN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CHINESE NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME CENTER AT SHANGHAI   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Breast; Breast cancer progression; Chromosome; Comparative genomic hybridization; Molecular cytogenetics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; CANCER GROWTH; CANCER STAGING; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CHROMOSOME 10P; CHROMOSOME 11P; CHROMOSOME 11Q; CHROMOSOME 12Q; CHROMOSOME 13Q; CHROMOSOME 14Q; CHROMOSOME 16P; CHROMOSOME 16Q; CHROMOSOME 17P; CHROMOSOME 17Q; CHROMOSOME 18Q; CHROMOSOME 1Q; CHROMOSOME 20Q; CHROMOSOME 22Q; CHROMOSOME 2Q; CHROMOSOME 5P; CHROMOSOME 8P; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME LOSS; CHROMOSOME XP; CHROMOSOME XQ; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE;

BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; CHROMOSOME BANDING; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; DISEASE PROGRESSION; GENE DOSAGE; HUMANS; HYPERPLASIA; NEOPLASM STAGING;

EID: 58549085378     PISSN: 09462716     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00109-008-0408-1     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Niu Y (2006) Pathology diagnostics of breast tumors. Science and Technology Publishing House, Tianjin
2. T Kuukasjärvi M Tanner S Pennanen R Karhu OP Kallioniemi J Isola 1997 Genetic changes in intraductal breast cancer detected by comparative genomic hybridization Am J Pathol 150 1465 1471
3. ES Hwang S DeVries KL Chew DH Moore 2nd K Kerlikowske A Thor BM Ljung FM Waldman 2004 Patterns of chromosomal alterations in breast ductal carcinoma in situ Clin Cancer Res 10 5160 5167
4. H Fujii R Szumel C Marsh W Zhou E Gabrielson 1996 Genetic progression, histological grade, and allelic loss in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast Cancer Res 56 5260 5265
5. DM Radford NJ Phillips KL Fair JH Ritter M Holt H Donis-Keller 1995 Allelic loss and the progression of breast cancer Cancer Res 55 5180 5183
6. G Gong S DeVries KL Chew I Cha BM Ljung FM Waldman 2001 Genetic changes in paired atypical and usual ductal hyperplasia of the breast by comparative genomic hybridization Clin Cancer Res 7 2410 2414
7. SR Lakhani N Collins MR Stratton JP Sloane 1995 Atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast: clonal proliferation with loss of heterozygosity on chromosomes 16q and 17p J Clin Pathol 48 611 615
8. SR Lakhani DN Slack RA Hamoudi N Collins MR Stratton JP Sloane 1996 Detection of allelic imbalance indicates that a proportion of mammary hyperplasia of usual type are clonal, neoplastic proliferations Lab Invest 74 129 135
9. MA Hermsen GA Meijer JP Baak H Joenje JJ Walboomers 1996 Comparative genomic hybridization: a new tool in cancer pathology Hum Pathol 27 342 349
10. NV Ostroverkhova SA Nazarenko AD Cheremnykh 2002 Comparative genomic hybridization as a new method for detection of genomic imbalance Genetika 38 149 160
11. B Levy K Hischhorn 2002 Characterization of constitutional chromosome abnormality by comparative genomic hybridization Methods Mol Biol 204 121 132
12. D Korinth K Donhuijsen U Bockmühl I Petersen 2004 PHOTOPROBE biotin: an alternative method for labeling archival DNA for comparative genomic hybridization Cell Oncol 26 329 334
13. JS Reis-Filho PT Simpson T Gale SR Lakhani 2005 The molecular genetics of breast cancer: the contribution of comparative genomic hybridization Pathol Res Pract 201 713 725
14. Lv S, Niu Y, Wei L, Liu Q, Wang X, Chen Y (2008) Chromosomal aberrations and genetic relations in benign, borderline and malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast: a comparative genomic hybridization study. Breast Cancer Res Treat (Epub ahead of print). doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9876-1
15. CG Toumpanakis ME Caplin 2008 Molecular genetics of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors Am J Gastroenterol 103 729 732
16. Tavassoli FA, Devilee P (2003) The WHO classification of tumors of the breast and female genital organs. IARC, Lyon
17. K Rennstam M Ahlstedt-Soini B Baldetorp PO Bendahl A Borg R Karhu M Tanner M Tirkkonen J Isola 2003 Patterns of chromosomal imbalances defines subgroups of breast cancer with distinct clinical features and prognosis. A study of 305 tumors by comparative genomic hybridization Cancer Res 63 8861 8868
18. AK Bednarek KJ Laflin RL Daniel Q Liao KA Hawkins CM Aldaz 2000 WWOX, a novel WW domain-containing protein mapping to human chromosome 16q23.3-24.1, a region frequently affected in breast cancer Cancer Res 60 2140 2145
19. H Buerger EC Mommers R Littmann R Diallo C Brinkschmidt C Poremba B Dockhorn-Dworniczak PJ van Diest W Böcker 2000 Correlation of morphologic and cytogenetic parameters of genetic instability with chromosomal alterations in in situ carcinomas of the breast Am J Clin Pathol 114 854 859
20. ML Yaremko WM Recant CA Westbrook 1995 Loss of heterozygosity from the short arm of chromosome 8 is an early event in breast cancers Genes Chromosomes Cancer 13 186 191
21. CY Ni MP Murphy TE Golde G Carpenter 2001 gamma-Secretase cleavage and nuclear localization of ErbB-4 receptor tyrosine kinase Science 294 2179 2181
22. MM Tanner M Tirkkonen A Kallioniemi K Holli C Collins D Kowbel JW Gray OP Kallioniemi J Isola 1995 Amplification of chromosomal regions 20q13 in invasive breast cancer: prognostic in placations Clin Cancer Res 1 1455 1461
23. E Savelieva CD Belair MA Newton S DeVries JW Gray F Waldman CA Reznikoff 1997 20q gain associates with immortalization: 20q13.2 amplification correlates with genome instability in human papillomavirus 16E7 transformed human uroepithelial cells Oncogene 14 551 560
24. S Cuthill P Agarwal S Sarkar E Savelieva CA Reznikoff 1999 Dominant genetic alterations in immortalization: role for 20q gain Genes Chromosomes Cancer 26 304 311
25. C Collins S Volik D Kowbel D Ginzinger B Ylstra T Cloutier T Hawkins P Predki C Martin M Wernick WL Kuo A Alberts JW Gray 2001 Comprehensive genome sequence analysis of a breast cancer amplicon Genome Res 11 1034 1042
26. LW Loo DI Grove EM Williams CL Neal LA Cousens EL Schubert IN Holcomb HF Massa J Glogovac CI Li KE Malone JR Daling JJ Delrow BJ Trask L Hsu PL Porter 2004 Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis of genomic alterations in breast cancer subtypes Cancer Res 64 8541 8549
27. JJ Isola OP Kallioniemi LW Chu SA Fuqua SG Hilsenbeck CK Osborne FM Waldman 1995 Genetic aberrations detected by comparative genomic hybridization predict outcome in node-negative breast cancer Am J Pathol 147 905 911
28. JJ Jacobs P Keblusek E Robanus-Maandag P Kristel M Lingbeek PM Nederlof T van Welsem MJ van de Vijver EY Koh GQ Daley M van Lohuizen 2000 Senescence bypass screen identifies TBX2, which represses Cdkn2a (p19(ARF)) and is amplified in a subset of human breast cancers Nat Genet 26 291 299
29. M Werner A Mattis M Aubele M Cummings H Zitzelsberger P Hutzler H Höfler 1999 20q13.2 amplification in intraductal hyperplasia adjacent to in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast Virchows Arch 435 469 472
30. B Mao W Wu G Davidson J Marhold M Li BM Mechler H Delius D Hoppe P Stannek C Walter A Glinka C Niehrs 2002 Kremen proteins are Dickkopf receptors that regulate Wnt/beta-catenin signaling Nature 417 664 667