Training set expansion: An approach to improving the reconstruction of biological networks from limited and uneven reliable interactions

Bioinformatics

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 243-250

  Yip, Kevin Y ^a   Gerstein, Mark ^a,b  

^a Yale University   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; COMPUTER PREDICTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GOLD STANDARD; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERNEL METHOD; LEARNING ALGORITHM; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NETWORK LEARNING; NONHUMAN; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; YEAST;

EID: 58349093930     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn602     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Aizerman,M. et al. (1964) Theoretical foundations of the potential function method in pattern recognition learning. Automat. Rem. Contr. 25, 821-837.
2. Ben-Hur,A. and Noble,W.S. (2005) Kernel methods for predicting protein-protein interactions. Bioinformatics, 21(Suppl. 1), i38-i46.
3. Bleakley,K. et al. (2007) Supervised reconstruction of biological networks with local models. Bioinformatics, 23, i57-i65.
4. Blum,A. and Mitchell,T. (1998) Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. In The Eleventh Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, California, USA, pp. 92-100.
5. Chang,C.-C. and Lin,C.-J. (2008) LIBSVM: A library for support vector machine. Available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/papers/ libsvm.pdf (last accessed date on October 2008).
6. Chapelle,O. et al. (eds) (2006) Semi-Supervised Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
7. Gasch,A.P. et al. (2000) Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell, 11, 4241-4257.
8. Gavin,A.-C. et al. (2006) Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature, 440, 631-636.
9. Giaever,G. et al. (2002) Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature, 418, 387-391.
10. Huang,H. et al. (2007) Where have all the interactions gone? Estimating the coverage of two-hybrid protein interaction maps. PLoS Comput. Biol., 3, e214.
11. Huh,W.-K. et al. (2003) Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature, 425, 686-691.
12. Ito,T. et al. (2000) Toward a protein-protein interaction map of the budding yeast: A comprehensive system to examine two-hybrid interactions in all possible combinations between the yeast proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 1143-1147.
13. Krogan,N.J. et al. (2006) Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature, 440, 637-643.
14. Lanckriet,G.R.G. et al. (2004) A statistical framework for genomic data fusion. Bioinformatics, 20, 2626-2635.
15. Mercer,J. (1909) Functions of positive and negative type, and their connection with the theory of integral equations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., 209, 415-446.
16. Myers,C.L. and Troyanskaya,O.G. (2007) Context-sensitive data integration and prediction of biological networks. Bioinformatics, 23, 2322-2330.
17. Qiu,J. and Noble,S. (2008) Predicting co-complexed protein pairs from heterogeneous data. PLoS Comput. Biol., 4, e1000054.
18. Schölkopf,B. et al. (eds) (2004) Kernel Methods in Computational Biology. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
19. Smola,A.J. and Schölkopf,B. (2004) A tutorial on support vector regression. Stat. Comput., 14, 199-222.
20. Spellman,P.T. et al. (1998) Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. Mol. Biol. Cell, 9, 3273-3297.
21. Stark,C. et al. (2006) BioGRID: A general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res., 34, D535-D539.
22. Tatusov,R.L. et al. (1997) A genomic perspective on protein families. Science, 278, 631-637.
23. Tsuda,K. et al. (2003) The em algorithm for kernel matrix completion with auxiliary data. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 4, 67-81.
24. Uetz,P. et al. (2000) A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature, 403, 623-627.
25. Vert,J.-P. and Yamanishi,Y. (2005) Supervised graph inference. In Saul,L.K. et al. (eds), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 17. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1433-1440.
26. Yamanishi,Y. et al. (2004) Protein network inference from multiple genomic data: A supervised approach. Bioinformatics, 20 (Suppl. 1), i363-i370.
27. Yamanishi,Y. et al. (2005) Supervised enzyme network inference from the integration of genomic data and chemical information. Bioinformatics, 21(Suppl. 1), i468-i477.
28. Yu,H. et al. (2008) High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science, 322, 104-110.